Skip to main content

States, Nations and Governments

  • Chapter
  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

States are important in international relations, though just how important is a matter of controversy. The traditional view of international relations has been that the discipline’s primary concern is the behaviour of states and their interactions with each other. These interactions were characterized by that fact that they took place in a situation of anarchy where there was no government to oversee and control them. Thus, war became a common feature of the system and security the dominant goal of foreign policy. States are regarded as sovereign in the territories under their jurisdiction, meaning that the state, or rather its government, controls what goes on within its borders. There is no overriding body in the world which rules over the states and their governments and, legally at least, there is nothing anyone can do in the area of a state without the active or tacit consent of that government. Formally, in the state system, all states are fully sovereign in that no authority takes precedence over them in their territories (though this is modified in the case of the European Union. See Chapter 3). This view is known as the realist approach which is discussed in more detail in Chapter 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading and Sources

  • The definitions of nations, states and so on are found in many texts but Philip Reynolds, An Introduction to International Relations (London: Longman, 1994, 3rd edn), takes them particularly seriously.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the problems of nationalism and ethnicity, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Pandaemonium: Ethnicity in International Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), is interesting and provocative. Anthony Smith is a prolific writer on nationalism. See, for example, Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • A collection of essays describing the recent developments in foreign policy analysis is edited by Laura Neack, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. Haney, Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in its Second Generation (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • A classic, and, despite its age, still worth reading, which discusses foreign policy analysis in terms of the Cuban Missile Crisis but which has significance for a much broader range of problems is Graham Allison, The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • I give an outline of the theories of crisis behaviour in my Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992). On the psychological aspects of crisis decision making, see Irving Janis, Groupthink (Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin, 1992, 2nd edn) — one of the small number of books in international relations which are fun to read.

    Google Scholar 

  • A recent study of crises is by Russell J. Leng, Interstate Crisis Behavior 1816–1980: Realism versus Reciprocity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Michael Nicholson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholson, M. (1998). States, Nations and Governments. In: International Relations. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26481-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics