Skip to main content

Functional and Line of Business Evolution Processes in MNC Subsidiaries: Sony in the USA, 1972–95

  • Chapter
Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development

Abstract

An important development in recent years has been the increasing interest in the evolution of multinational corporations (MNCs). Rather than examining questions of MNC strategy and structure in a cross-sectional fashion, a number of scholars have focused their attention on the developmental trajectory by which firms undertake foreign investment, configure their world-wide activities, and achieve coordination among them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aharoni, Y. (1966) The Foreign Investment Decision Process, Boston, Mass.: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajami, R.A. and D.A. Ricks (1981) ‘Motives of Non-American Firms Investing in the United States’, 12,1 Journal of International Business Studies, Winter, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G.T. (1971) Essence ofDecision, Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.P. and R.A. Burgelman (1996) ‘Evolutionary Perspectives on Strategy’, Strategic ManagementJournal, 17, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1986) ‘Tap Your Subsidiaries for Global Reach’, Harvard Business Review, November—December, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L. (1970) Managing the Resource Allocation Process, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. (1983) ‘A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, RA. (1996) ‘A Process Model of Strategic Business Exit: Implications for an Evolutionary Perspective on Strategy’, Strategic Management Journal 17, 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. and S.K. Mehra (1986) ‘Entry of Foreign Multinationals into US Manufacturing Industries’, in M.E. Porter (ed.), Competition in Globallndustries, Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 449–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S-J. (1995) ‘International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building Through Sequential entry’, Academy of Management Journal 38 (2), 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1988) Exp laininglnternational Production, London and Boston: Unw in Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., U. Holm and J. Johanson (1995) ‘Division Headquarters Go Abroad: a Step in the Internationalization of the Multinational Corporation’, Journal ofManagement Studies, 32 (4), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988) ‘The Multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of the Transaction Cost Explanation’, Journal ofLaw, Economics, and Organization 4, 304–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and C.A. Bartlett (1988) ‘Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 3 Fall, 365–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and C.A. Bartlett (1990) ‘The Multinational Corporation as an Inerorganizational Network’, Academy ofManagement Review, 15 (4), 603–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., H. Korine and G. Szulanski (1994) Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations’, Management Science, 40 (1), 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria (1989) ‘Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations’, StrategicManagementJournal, 10, 323–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan (1991) ‘Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control within Multinational Corporations’, Academy ofManagement Review, 16 (4), 768–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1986) ‘The Hypermodern MNC: a Heterarchy?’, Human Resource Management, 25, 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.W.L., P. Hwang and W.C. Kim (1990) ‘An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode’, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J.C. and J.I. Martinez (1990) ‘Different Roles for Subsidiaries: the Case of Multinational Corporations in Spain’, Strategic Management Journa 11, 501–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and J-E. Vahlne (1977) ‘The Internationalization Process of the Firm: a Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and F. Weidersheim-Paul (1975) ‘The Internationalization of the Firm — Four Swedish Case Studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 12 (3), 305–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagono, T., I. Nonaka, K. Sakakibara and A. Okumura (1985) Strategic Versus Evolutionary Management: a US Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickerbocker, F.T. (1973) Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise, Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1983) ‘Foreign Direct Investment as a Sequential Process’, in C. Kindelberger and D. Audretsch (eds), The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1985) ‘Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-added Chains’, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and S-J. Chang (1991) ‘Technological Capabilities and Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 401–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1993) ‘Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4), 625–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S.P (1977) ‘Information and the Multinational Corporation: an Appropriability Theory of Direct Foreign Investment’, in J. Bhagwati (ed.), The New International Economic Order, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 317–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malnight, T.W. (1995) ‘Globalization of an Ethnocentric Firm: an Evolutionary Perspective’, Strategic ManagementJournal 16, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malnight, T.W. (1996) ‘The Transition from Decentralized to Network-Based MNC Structures: an Evolutionary Perspective’, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, 27 (1), 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita, A. (1986) Made inJapan: Akio Morita and Sony, New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T. and J.L. Bower (1996) ‘Strategy Making as Iterated Processes of Resource Allocation’, Atrategic Management Journal 17, 159–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H. (1969) ‘The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation’, ColumbiaJournal of World Business, 4, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, F.R. (1994) Entry Strategies forInternationalMarkets, New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. (1992) ‘Suggestions for Studying Strategy Processes: a Research Note’, Strategic Managementfournal 13, Special Issue, 169–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1989) Case-Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, S.J., Rosenzweig, P.M. (1998). Functional and Line of Business Evolution Processes in MNC Subsidiaries: Sony in the USA, 1972–95. In: Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. (eds) Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26467-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics