The Animal Protection Movement: Recruitment, Ideology and Strategy

  • Robert Garner


The increasing political activity of the interests described in the last chapter is, of course, a reaction to society’s growing interest in, and concern for, the welfare of animals. This increasing concern is a product of the interaction of various factors,1 but one crucial ingredient has been the increasingly visible role played by the animal protection movement. Of course, organizational concern for the plight of animals dates back, in both Britain and the United States, to the nineteenth century. Over the past two decades or so, however, the animal protection movement has been revitalized and radicalized to the extent that it has become an important player in the social movement and pressure group universes.


Animal Welfare Animal Protection Wildlife Conservation Human Interest Animal Abuse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    See D. Truman, The Governmental Process (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1951).Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Kay Schlozman, ‘What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System’, Journal of Politics, 46 (1984) p. 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 11.
    For the classic account which deliberately compares human and animal exploitation see M. Spiegel, The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery (Philadelphia: New Society, 1988).Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Literature discussing the relationship between animal protection and the left includes J. Sanbonnatsu, ‘Animal Liberation: Should the left Care?’ Z Magazine (October 1989) pp. 101–10;Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    T. Benton, Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice (London: Verso, 1993);Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    A. Charlton and G. Francione, ‘The American Left Should Support Animal Rights: A Manifesto’, The Animals’ Agenda (January-February 1993 ) pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Animal protectionist literature from a feminist perspective is C. Adams, The Sexual Politics of Meat (New York: Continuum, 1990) and Neither Man Nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals (New York: Continuum, 1995).Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    J. Walker, ‘The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America’, American Political Science Review, 77 (1983) p. 397.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    R. Salisbury, ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13 (1969) p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 27.
    P. Greanville and D. Moss, ‘The Emerging Face of the Movement’, The Animals’ Agenda (March-April 1985) pp. 10–11, 36.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    W. Gamson, ‘The Social Psychology of Collective Action’, in A. Morris and C. Mueller (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992) p. 56.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    J.L. Mansbridge, Why We Lost the ERA (University of Chicago Press, 1986) p. 179.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    W. Gormley, ‘Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System’, Polity, 18 (1986) pp. 608–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 57.
    T Benton and R. Redfearn, ‘The Politics of Animal Rights: Where is the Left’, New Left Review, 215 (1996) p. 51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Garner 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Garner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations