Skip to main content

The Politics of Animal Research in the United States

  • Chapter
  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

In many ways, the animal research policy arena in the United States is the most difficult to describe and evaluate. It is clearly the case that since the 1960s Congress has responded to intermittent bouts of public pressure and that, superficially at least, the legislative protection afforded to research animals is better than it was. The range of institutions and actors involved in the animal research decision-making process would also suggest the existence of a pluralistic issue network rather than a closed policy community. What this chapter will seek to show, however, is that this very pluralistic structure has appeared, more often than not, to blunt the edges of reform thereby thwarting the will of Congress and a concerned public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. Oleszek, Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process 4th edn (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1996) pp. 104–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quoted in L. Finsen, ‘Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: A New Set of Clothes for the Emperor’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13 (1988) p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Sanders and J. Jasper, ‘Civil Politics in the Animal Rights Conflict’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 19 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Marcus, ‘Tackling the Titans’, Vegetarian Times (September 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kaufman, ‘Facing the Challenge’, AV Magazine (March 1993) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See also A. Morrison, ‘Improving the Image of Biomedical Research’, Lab Animal, 23 (1994) pp. 36–9. Morrison also defended Edward Taub in the media and in court.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See W. Cloud, ‘A View from within the DHSS’, AV Magazine (October 1993) pp. 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Kerwin, Congressional Quarterly’s Federal Regulatory Directory’, 6th edn (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1990) pp. 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The following account is based on G. Rubinstein. ‘Creature Discomforts’, Government Information Insider (Washington DC: OMB Watch, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See AWI, Beyond the Laboratory Door (Washington DC: Animal Welfare Institute, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Kitschelt, ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1986) pp. 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Robert Garner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garner, R. (1998). The Politics of Animal Research in the United States. In: Political Animals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26438-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics