Abstract
In many ways, the animal research policy arena in the United States is the most difficult to describe and evaluate. It is clearly the case that since the 1960s Congress has responded to intermittent bouts of public pressure and that, superficially at least, the legislative protection afforded to research animals is better than it was. The range of institutions and actors involved in the animal research decision-making process would also suggest the existence of a pluralistic issue network rather than a closed policy community. What this chapter will seek to show, however, is that this very pluralistic structure has appeared, more often than not, to blunt the edges of reform thereby thwarting the will of Congress and a concerned public.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
W. Oleszek, Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process 4th edn (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1996) pp. 104–5.
Quoted in L. Finsen, ‘Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: A New Set of Clothes for the Emperor’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13 (1988) p. 148.
S. Sanders and J. Jasper, ‘Civil Politics in the Animal Rights Conflict’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 19 (1994).
E. Marcus, ‘Tackling the Titans’, Vegetarian Times (September 1993).
R. Kaufman, ‘Facing the Challenge’, AV Magazine (March 1993) p. 22.
See also A. Morrison, ‘Improving the Image of Biomedical Research’, Lab Animal, 23 (1994) pp. 36–9. Morrison also defended Edward Taub in the media and in court.
See W. Cloud, ‘A View from within the DHSS’, AV Magazine (October 1993) pp. 12–15.
C. Kerwin, Congressional Quarterly’s Federal Regulatory Directory’, 6th edn (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1990) pp. 19–27.
The following account is based on G. Rubinstein. ‘Creature Discomforts’, Government Information Insider (Washington DC: OMB Watch, 1991).
See AWI, Beyond the Laboratory Door (Washington DC: Animal Welfare Institute, 1985).
H. Kitschelt, ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1986) pp. 57–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Robert Garner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garner, R. (1998). The Politics of Animal Research in the United States. In: Political Animals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26438-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26438-4_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-73000-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26438-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)