Skip to main content

Contemporary Critical Accounts

  • Chapter
Book cover Gothic Horror

Abstract

Montague Rhodes James set out his rules for the ghost story, such as they were, in the various brief prefaces to his collections of tales. Unlike Vernon Lee, he believed it important to establish a setting that was

fairly familiar and the majority of the characters and their talk such as you may meet or hear any day. A ghost story of which the scene is laid in the twelfth or thirteenth century may succeed in being romantic or poetical: it will never put the reader into the position of saying to himself, ‘If I’m not very careful, something of this kind may happen to me!’ (Preface to More Ghost Stories of an Antiquary, 1911).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Julia Briggs, Night Visitors: The Rise and Fall of the English Ghost Story (London: Faber, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cited in Edward Wasiolek, Dostoevsky: The Major Fiction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonathan Culler, ‘Literary Fantasy’, Cambridge Review, 93 (1973) p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fredric Jameson, ‘Magical Narratives: Romance as Genre’, New Literary History, 7 (Autumn 1975) p. 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. First published in Brian Docherty (ed.), American Horror Fiction (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suzy McKee Charnas, The Vampire Tapestry (London: Granada, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For valuable discussions of fantasy literature and the horror genre, and their conventions, see Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion (London: Methuen, 1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. David Punter, The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fiction from 1765 to the Present Day (London: Longman, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination, ed. M. Holquist and C. Emerson (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See’ sexual Politics and Political Repression in Bram Stoker’s Dracula’, in Clive Bloom, Brian Docherty, Jane Gibb and Keith Shand (eds), Nineteenth-Century Suspense: From Foe to Conan Doyle (London: Macmillan, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. First published in Brian Docherty (ed.), American Horror Fiction (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. P. Lovecraft, Supernatural Horror in Literature (New York: Dover, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Peter Penzoldt, The Supernatural in Fiction (London: Peter Nevill, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion (London: Methuen, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. See Nancy Chodorow, The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jean Baker Miller, Towards a New Psychology of Women (London: Allen Lane, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A motif traced, in Jungian terms, in Jackson’s work by Steven K. Hoffman, in ‘Individuation and Character Development in the Fiction of Shirley Jackson’, Hartford Studies in Literature, 8 (1976) 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elizabeth Abel, Marianne Hirsch and Elizabeth Langland (eds), The Voyage In: Fictions of Female Development (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Page references in parentheses relate to Shirley Jackson, The Haunting of Hill House (London: Michael Joseph, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shirley Jackson, The Sundial (New York: Penguin, 1986) p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mrs Montague’s discoveries recall the worst excesses of the ghost hunter, at Borley Rectory in Essex. See Harry Price, The Most Haunted House in England: Ten Years’ Investigation of Borley Rectory (London: Longmans, Green, 1940)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Goodrich Freer and John, Marquess of Bute, The Alleged Haunting of Ballechin House (London: George Redway, 1899).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Peter Underwood, Dictionary of the Occult and Supernatural (London: George G. Harrap, 1978) p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  25. From J. Gerald Kennedy, Poe, Death and the Life of Writing (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a helpful survey of critical responses to Pym see Douglas Robinson, ‘Reading Poe’s Novel: A Speculative Review of Pym Criticism, 1950–1980,’ Poe Studies, 15 (December 1982), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Gerald Kennedy, ‘The Preface as a Key to the Satire in Pym,’ Studies in the Novel, 5 (Summer 1973), 191–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patrick H. Quinn, The French Face of Edgar Poe (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press, 1957) pp. 176–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edward H. Davidson, Poe: A Critical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957) pp. 168

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Jean Ricardou, ‘Le Caractère singulier de cette eau,’ Critique, 243–4 (August–September 1967) pp. 729–30; John Carlos Rowe, Through the Custom-House: Nineteenth-Century American Fiction and Modern Theory (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982) pp. 95

    Google Scholar 

  31. John T. Irwin, American Hieroglyphics: The Symbol of the Egyptian Hieroglyphics in the American Renaissance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980) p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Hoffman, Foe Poe Poe Poe Poe Poe Poe (New York: Doubleday, 1972) p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Gerald Kennedy, ‘The “Infernal Twoness” of Arthur Gordon Pym, Topic’, 30 (Fall 1976) p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Michel Ragon, The Space of Death: A Study of Funerary Architecture, Decoration, and Urbanism, tr. Alan Sheridan (Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Edgar Morin, L’homme et la mort (Paris: Éditions de Seuil, 1970) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  36. René Girard, Violence and the Sacred, tr. Patrick Gregory (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977) p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robert J. Lifton, The Broken Connection (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1980) p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  38. George Steiner, Language and Silence: Essays on Language, Literature, and the Inhuman (New York: Atheneum, 1976) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maurice Blanchot, The Space of Literature, tr. Ann Smock (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982) pp. 91

    Google Scholar 

  40. First published in Manuel Aguirre, The Closed Space: Horror Fiction and Western Symbolism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. First published in Clive Bloom (ed.), Creepers (London: Pluto, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Angela Carter in conversation with John Haffenden, The Literary Review, v (1984) p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  43. First published in Clive Bloom (ed.), Creepers (London: Pluto, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  44. The primary source of information and quotes for this feature is Martin Barker’s A Haunt of Fears (London: Pluto Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Clive Bloom

Copyright information

© 1998 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briggs, J. et al. (1998). Contemporary Critical Accounts. In: Bloom, C. (eds) Gothic Horror. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26398-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics