Abstract
An exceptional geographical situation has given the North Caucasus a role which has always transcended its borders. As a result of the historical changes which have taken place in the last two centuries, the borders of the North Caucasus now run along the Kuban and Kuma rivers in the north, and approximately along the principal range of the Caucasus mountains in the south. To the west and east the North Caucasus is bounded by the Black and Caspian seas respectively. It lies between two continents right at the junction of historical trade routes. The North Caucasus has at all times been a point where the civilizations of West and East met and mingled.
Today the Bolsheviks fear the dead Shamil more than the Vorontsovs and Bariatinskiis feared him as a live, but honourable enemy.
— Editorial in Svobodnyi Kavkaz, No.4(1952)1
There will not be a Second Caucasian War. Shamil, his Mürids and Gazavat will remain in the past
— Pavel Felgengauer2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in L. Tillett, The Great Friendship (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969), p.130.
Segodnia, 17 December 1994, p.3.
M. Lermontov, A Hero of Our Times (London: 1940); L. Tolstoy, Ivan Ilych and Hadji Murat (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1935).
H. Troyat, Pushkin (London: Allen and Unwin, 1974), pp.168–74.
This brief summary is based on the following sources: M. Saray (ed.), Kafkas Arastirmalari, I (Istanbul: 1988); I. Berkok, Tarihte Kafkasya (Istanbul: 1958); N.A. Smirnov, Politika Rossii na Kavkaze v XVI–XIX Vekakh (Moscow: 1958); J.E Baddeley, The Russian Conquest of the Caucasus (London: Longmans Green, 1908).
L. Blanch, The Sabres of Paradise (London: John Murray, 1960). This is a very colourful, historically accurate, but somewhat romanticized account of Shamil’s movement. For expatriate literature in Turkish see T.M. Göztepe, Imam Samil, Kafkasya’nin Büyük Harp ve Ihtilal Kahramani (Istanbul: 1961); A.H. Hizal, Kuzey Kafkasya (Ankara: 1961); A. Kunduk, Kafkasya Müridizmi (Istanbul: 1987); S.N. Tansu, Çaglara Basegmeyen Dagli. Seyh Samil (Istanbul: 1963); Z. Yetik, Imam Samil (Istanbul: 1986).
W.E.D. Allen and P. Muratoff speculate in their Caucasian Battlefields that Sheikh Mansur was either a renegade Italian monk or a Turkish agent. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953), p.45. For the details of Mansur’s life see A. Bennigsen’s important study, ‘Un mouvement populaire au Caucase au XVHIe siècle’, Cahiers du Monde russe et Soviétique, Vol.V/2 (1964), pp.159–97.
B. Gökay, ‘Chechens Make Fearsome Enemies — Historical Background of Russia’s agelong fight in Chechnia’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol.IX, No.1 (1994–5), pp.81–3; C. Gökçe, Kafkasya ve Osmanli Imparatorlugu’nun Kafkasya Siyaseti (Istanbul: 1979), pp.247–53; T.C. Kutlu, Kuzey Kafkasya’nin Ilk Milli Mücahidi ve Önderi, Imam Mansur (Istanbul: 1987), pp.42–5.
Berkok, Tarihte Kafkasya, pp.449–52.
The most comprehensive study of Shamil is M. Gammer, Muslim Resistance to the Tsar (London: Frank Cass, 1994).
S. Erel, Dagistan ve Dagistanlilar (Istanbul: 1961), p.144; M.Z. Hizaloglu, Seyh Samil Simali Kafkasya Istiklal Mücadeleleri (Ankara: 1958), pp.25–7.
18 July 1856, B.A. Irade-Dahiliye, No.26886, Osmanli Devleti ile Kafkasya, Türkistan ve Kirim Hanliklari Arasindaki Münasebetlere Dair Arsiv Belgeleri (Ankara: 1992), p.11.
J.F. Baddeley, The Russian Conquest of the Caucasus (London: Longmans Green, 1908).
W.E.D. Allen and P. Muratoff, Caucasian Battlefields (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953), p.107.
For a description of the Shamil debate in Soviet historiography see Paul B. Henze, ‘The Shamil Problem’, in W.Z. Laqueur (ed.), The Middle East in Transition (London: Routledge and Paul, 1958), pp.415–43; L.R. Tillet, ‘Shamil and Muridism in Recent Soviet Historiography’, The American Slavic and East European Review (1961), pp.253–69; L.R. Tillet, The Great Friendship (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969); B.D. Wolfe, ‘Operation Rewrite: The Agony of Soviet Historians’, Foreign Affairs, 1, October 1951, pp.39–57.
Cited in K. Marx and F. Engels, The Russian Menace to Europe (ed. by P.W. Blackstock and B.F. Hoselitz) (London: Allen and Unwin, 1953), p.11.
See ibid., pp.84–90, 133–37, 140–48.
Marx, The Eastern Question, p.40. (In the 1880s, Marx’s daughter Eleanor Marx Aveling and her husband Edward Aveling collected, collated, and edited all of Marx’s correspondence for the New York Tribune from the Crimean War period. It was published in 1897 in a 650-page volume entitled The Eastern Question, a Reprint of Letters Written 1853–56 Dealing with the Events of the Crimean War, London: Swan, Sonnenschein & Co. Ltd. The volume was republished in 1969 by Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, New York.
Marx, The Eastern Question, p.148.
Lenin, The National Liberation Movement in the East (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1962), p.86.
Ibid., p.87.
A.I. Denikin, The White Army (London: Jonathan Cape, 1930), p.156.
J.V. Stalin, Sochineniia IV (Moscow: 1947), pp.395–96.
Ibid., p.143.
From Ordzhonikidze’s speech in the Council of People’s Commissars, 10 July 1919, in G.K. Ordzhonikidze, Izbrannie stat’i i rechi, 1911–1937 (Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo Politicheskoi Literatury, 1939), pp.51–72.
Zelimkhan, a Chechen bandit of honour, was famous throughout Russia before the First World War. (Abdurahman Avtorkhanov, ‘The Chechens and Ingush during the Soviet Period and its Antecedents’, in M.B. Broxup, The North Caucasus Barrier (London: Hurst, 1992), p.169.
For the background of political events in the Caucasus, which contributed to the outbreak of the 1920–1 uprising, see T. Swietochowski, Russian Azerbeijan 1905–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press, 1985), pp.165–90.
A. Todorski, Krasnaia Armia v Gorakh, Deistviia v Daghestane (Moscow: Voennyi Vestnik, 1924), pp.132–35.
N. Samurskii, Daghestan (Moscow and Leningrad: 1925), pp.138–39.
Four detailed and relatively objective works were published before 1927 by actors in the drama. Samurskii and Takho-Godi were the leading communists in Daghestan at the time of the uprising. Todorskii, a Russian, was the commander of the 11th Red Army. All three authors were later purged by Stalin. Samurskii was executed in 1937, and Takho-Godi and Todorskii were deported to labour camps. (Najmuddin Samurskii-Efendiev, Daghestan (Moscow, Leningrad: 1925); Najmuddin Samurskii-Efendiev Grazhdanskaia voina v Dagestane (Makhachkala: 1925); Ali Akbar Takho-Godi, Revoliutsiia i kontrrevoliutsiia v Dagestane (Makhachkala: Dagestanskii Institut, 1927); A. Todorskii, krasnaia armiia v gorakh-destviia v Dagestane (Moscow: 1924).)
First published in Pravda Gruzii on 8 May 1921, and reprinted in Lenin, Collected Works XXXII (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1973), p.317.
Lenin, The National Liberation Movement in the East, p.307.
Aleksandr Uralov (A. Avtorkhanov), Narodoubiistvo v SSSR. Ubiistvo Chechenskogo Naroda (Munich: 1952), p.20.
For Pokrovskii’s life and work see P.O. Gorin, M.N Pokrovskii-bolshevik-istorik (Moscow: n.d.); G.M. Enteen, The Soviet Scholar-Bureaucrat (University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1978).
Quoted in ibid., p.98.
‘Russian Imperialism in the Past and Present’, Russia in World Politics (Ann Arbor: 1970), pp.117–30.
A.V. Shestakov (ed.), Kratkii kurs istorii SSSR (Moscow: 1937), p.90.
A.M. Pankratova, Istoriya SSSR II (Moscow: 1944), pp.155–58.
A. Bennigsen and S.E. Wimbush, Mystics and Commissars (London: Hurst, 1985), p.28.
A. Nove, Stalinism and After (London: Allen and Unwin, 1975); R. Conquest, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan, 1968); J.A. Getty, The Origins of the Great Purges 1933–1938 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Sh.F. Mukhamedyarov and B.F. Sultanbekov, ‘Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev: His Character and Fate’, Central Asian Survey, IX, 2, (1990), pp.109–117.
G. Wheeler, ‘Modernisation in the Muslim East: The Role of Script and Language Reform’, Asian Affairs (Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society), 61, Part. II (June 1974), p.157.
Stalin himself referred to collectivization as a ‘revolution carried out from above, on the government’s initiative and whose impact equalled the October 1917 revolution.’ Geschichte der Kommunistischen Partei der Sowjetunion [Bolschewiki]. Kurzer Lehrgang (Berlin: 1946), p.369.
Abbas Bagirov, writing in Bakinskii Rabochi, 8 December 1938.
Istoriia industrializatsii Kazakhskoi SSR, 1926–1941 gg. II (Alma-Ata: 1967), p.860.
Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ II (Moscow: 1964), p.606.
B. Kanditov, Tserkov i Shpionazh (Moscow: 1938), p.95.
S. Aymergen, Son Köprü (Istanbul: Gülan Grafik, 1992). Aymergen’s memoirs were published only in 1992 in Turkish.
M.I. Isaev, O iazykakh narodov SSSR (Moscow: 1978), p.15.
Engels’s article was originally published in Russian in Sotsialdemokrat, 2 (1890) and in German in Die Neue Zeit, VIII, (1890).
Stalin’s letter was not published until May 1941 when it appeared in Bolshevik, XVIII, 9 (1941), pp.1–5.
M.V. Nechkina, ‘K itogam diskussii o periodizatsii istorii sovetskoi istoricheskoi nauki’ Istoriia SSSR, 2 (1962), pp.57–68.
Direktivy VKP(b) i postanovleniia Sovetskogo pravitel’stva o narodnom obrazovanii. Sbornik dokumentov za 1919–1947 gg. (Moscow-Leningrad: 1947), pp.200–1.
K.F. Shteppa, ‘The “Lesser Evil” Formula’, in C.E. Black (ed.), Rewriting Russian History (New York: Praeger, 1962), pp.107–20; M. Nechkina, ‘K voprosu o formule “naimen’shee zlo’”, Voprosy Istorii, 4 (1951), pp.44–8.
E. Iaroslavskii, ‘Bol’sheviki-prodolzhateli luchikh patrioticheskikh traditsii russkogo naroda’, Pravda, 27 December 1941.
V.I. Filkin, Partiinaia organizatsiia Checheno-Ingushetii v gody bor’by za uprochenie i razvitie sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva (1937-iun’ 1941 gg.) (Grozny: 1960), pp.42–3.
Pankratova, Istoriia SSSR II (Moscow: 1944), pp.155–8.
Cited by Robert Conquest, The Nation Killers: The Soviet Deportation of Nationalities (London: Macmillan, 1970), p.74.
E. Genkina, Formation of the USSR (Moscow: 1943), p.76.
The standard works on Stalin’s deportations during the Second World War of the North Caucasians, as well as the Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars and Meskhetians, are R. Conquest, op.cit. and A.M. Nekrich, The Punished Peoples (London: Norton, 1978).
M. Heller and A. Nekrich, Utopia in Power: A History of the USSR (London: Hutchinson, 1986), p.486.
Ibid., p.491.
B.D. Wolfe, writing in Foreign Affairs, October 1952, p.40.
Istoricheskaia nauka v SSSR, ‘Diskussiia o dvizhenii Shamilia’, Voprosy Istorii, 11 (1947), pp.134–40.
M.D. Bagirov, ‘K voprosu o kharaktere dvizheniia miuridizma i Shamilia’, Bolshevik, 13 July 1950, pp.21–37.
N. Smirnov, ‘Sheikh Mansur i ego turetskie vdokhnoviteli’, Voprosy Istorii, 10 (1950), pp.19–39; E. Adamov and L. Kutakov, ‘Iz istorii proiskov inostrannoi agentury vo vremia kavkazskikh voin’, Voprosy Istorii, 11 (1950), pp.101–5; A. Fadeev, ‘Miuridizm kak orudie agressivnoi politiki Turtsii i Anghi na severo-zapadnom kavkaze v XIX stoletii’, Voprosy Istorii, 9 (1951), pp.76–96; E.E. Burchuladze, ‘Krushenie anglo-turetskikh zakhvatnicheskikh planov v Gruzii v 1855–1856 godakh’, Voprosy Istorii, 4 (1952), pp.10–24.
M. Nechkina, ‘K voprosu o formule “naimen’shee zlo”’, Voprosy Istorii, 4 (1951), pp.44–8.
Ibid.
A. Daniialov, ‘Ob izvrashcheniiakh v osveshchenii miuridizma i dvizheniia Shamilia’, Voprosy Istorii, 9 (1950), pp.3–18.
E. Adamov and L. Kutakov, ‘Iz istorii proiskov inostrannoi agentury vo vremia kavkazskikh voin’, Voprosy Istorii, 11 (1950), pp.101–105.
E.E. Burchuladze, ‘Krushenie anglo-turetskikh zakhvatnicheskikh planov v gruzii v 1855–1856 godakh’, Voprosy Istorii, 4 (1952), pp.10–24.
Current Digest of the Soviet Press, V, 3, p.8.
Nekrich, Punished Peoples, pp.144–54.
Iv.V. Krianev, ‘Tipologiia religioznykh ob”edinenii i differentsiatsia ateisticheskogo vospitaniia’, Voprosy nauchnogo ateizma, 3 (1967), p.54.
In the West little attention has been paid until recently to the post-Stalin debate on Shamil. See A. Sheehy, ‘Another Chapter in the Rewrite of History: “The Voluntary Incorporation” of Checheno-Ingushetia’, Radio Liberty Research, No. RL 396/82, 30 September 1982; A. Sheehy, ‘Yet Another Rewrite of the History of the Caucasian War?’, Radio Liberty Research, No. RL 271/88, 28 June 1988; S. Crow, ‘A New Interpretation to the Caucasian Wars and the Role of Shamir’, Radio Liberty Report on the USSR, I, 35, 1 September 1989, p.32.
A.V Fadeev, ‘O vnutrennei sotsial’noi baze miuridistskogo dvizheniia na Kavkaze v XIX veke’, Voprosy Istorii, 6 (1955), pp.67–77.
‘Konferentsiia chitatelei zhurnala “Voprosy Istorii”, Voprosy Istorii, 2 (1956), pp.199–213.
Pravda, 18 February 1956; Speech by A. Mikoyan at the XXth Congress, in I. Gruliow (ed.), Current Soviet Policies II (New York: Columbia University Press, 1957), p.88.
A.M. Pikman, ‘O bor’be kavkazskikh gortsev s tsarskimi kolonizatorami’, Voprosy Istorii, 3 (1956), pp.75–84.
G.D. Daniialov, ‘O dvizhenii gortsev pod rukovodstvom Shamilia’, Voprosy Istorii, 7 (1956), pp.67–72.
‘Obsuzhdenie voprosa o kharaktere dvizhenii gorskikh narodov severnogo Kavkaza’, Voprosy Istorii, 12 (1956), pp.188–198.
G.D. Daniialov (ed.), Dvizhenie gortsev severo-vostochnogo kavkaza v 20–50 gg. veka. Sbornik dokumentov (Makhachkala: 1959), pp.4–7.
G.D. Daniialov, ‘O dvizhenii gortsev Dagestana i Chechni pod rukovodstvom Shamilia’, Voprosy Istorii, 10 (1966), pp.17–28.
G.D. Daniialov (ed), Istoriia Dagestana (Moscow: 1967–69), 3 vols.
‘Obsuzhdenie “ocherkov istorii Checheno-Ingushskoi ASSR” Konferentsiia v g. Groznom’, Istoriia SSSR, 1 (1974), pp.232–4.
‘Istoriografiia istorii narodov Dona i Severnogo Kavkaza. Vtoraia vserossiiskaia konferentsiia v Groznom’, Istoriia SSSR, 2 (1979), p.212.
In June 1985, a number of Chechen recruits arrived in Astrakhan for army service. There they clashed with the military authorities when they were told that they would be trained for Afghanistan. (S. Khovanski, ‘Afghanistan: The Bleeding Wound’, Detente, 6, Spring 1986.)
I. Beliaev, writing in Literaturnaia gazeta, 16 January 1980.
A Artem’ev, ‘Current tasks of atheist propaganda’, Kazakhstan Kommunisti (Alma-Ata), 11 (1980), p.41.
Dmitri Bezuglyi, ‘S poritsii boitsa’, Zhumalist (Moscow), 1 (1981), pp.46–48.
A. Sheehy, ‘Yet Another Rewrite of the History of the Caucasian War?’, Radio Liberty Research Bulletin, 30 January 1984.
‘Kavkazskaia voina: sotsial’nye istoki, sushchnost’, Istoriia SSSR, No.2 (1983), pp.54–75.
V.V. Chernous, ‘Organizatsiia istoricheskikh issledovanii v severo-kavkazskom nauchnom tsentre vysshei shkoly’, Voprosy istorii, 11 (1981), p.123.
V.B. Vinogradov, ‘Rossiia i Severnyi Kavkaz (Obzor literatury za 1976–1985 gody: Itogi i perspektivy izucheniia)’, Istoriia SSSR, 3 (1987), p.96.
R. Pikul’, Miniatury (Leningrad: 1983).
G. Gamzatov, ‘Perestroika i natsional’noe soznanie: Aspekty gumanitarnyii i istoricheskii’, Sovetskii Dagestan, 6 (1988), p.22.
Andropov’s speech of December 1982 on the sixtieth anniversary of the Soviet Union, published in Neues Deutschland, 22 December 1982.
Quoted by R.W. Davies, ‘Changing Official Views of Soviet History’, Detente, 11 (December 1988), p.12.
Vestnik Akademii nauk SSSR, 6 (1987), pp.61, 68–70.
J. Ormrod, ‘The North Caucasus: fragmentation or federation?’, in I. Bremmer and R. Taras (eds), Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p.452.
A. Khalilov, ‘Shamil v. istorii i pamiati narodov’, Sovetskii Daghestan, 5 (1988), pp.31–7.
Institut Istorii SSSR AN SSSR; Institut Istorii, Iazyka i Literatury im. G. Tsadasy Dagestanskogo Filiala AN SSSR; Dagestanskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet im V.I. Lenina, Narodno-osvoboditel’noe dvizhenie gortsev Dagestana i Chechni v 20–50kh godakh XIX v. Vsesoiuznaia nauchnaia konferentsiia, 20–22 iiunia 1989 g. Tezisy dokladov i soobshchenii (Makhachkala: 1989).
Ibid.
‘Proshchai, oruzhie?’, Nezavisimaia gazeta, 31 January 1991, p.3. For the ‘Treaty on the Confederative Union of the Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus’ see B.G. Hewitt, ‘Abkhazia: A Problem of Identity and Ownership’, Appendix 4, Central Asian Survey, 12, 3 (1993), pp.304–9.
R. Khasbulatov, Chechnia (Moscow: 1995), p.62.
R. Khasbulatov, op. cit. p.67.
The Independent Magazine, 14 January 1995, p.21.
Rossiiskaia gazeta, 15 December 1994, pp.1–2.
Rossiiskaia gazeta, 29 December 1994, pp.1–2. These and other similar comments in the Russian media are extraordinarily similar to those published in Stalin’s last years. Especially in late 1952, many references had been made to the North Caucasian Muslims as ‘nations of criminals’. (Izvestiia, 25 November 1952; Pravda, 10 December 1952.)
See a recent collection of essays by Russian scholars on the North Caucasian Wars, ‘Kavkazskaia Voina: XIX Vek (Neizvestnye Stranitsy)’, Rodina, 3–4 (1994), pp.10–151.
Moskovskie novosti, 4, 26 January 1992, p.8.
Segodnia, 17 December 1994, p.3.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gökay, B. (1998). The Longstanding Russian and Soviet Debate over Sheikh Shamil: Anti-Imperialist Hero or Counter-Revolutionary Cleric?. In: Fowkes, B. (eds) Russia and Chechnia: The Permanent Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26351-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26351-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26353-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26351-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)