Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The legitimacy of Hong Kong’s return to China is largely reliant on the notion of reunification of the motherland. But the law also plays a crucial role: arrangements for the future are the product of a binding treaty and are enacted in a constitution which guarantees the by-and-large maintenance of existing legislative and judicial systems, laws, rights and freedoms, and the rule of law. The devil being, as it usually is, in the details, the promises look less convincing when particular issues are addressed, and of course the political context affects one’s confidence in the efficacy of the legal documents. Nevertheless, if legal institutions can be expected to survive the transition to Chinese rule, there is some reason for anxious citizens, as Deng Xiaoping advised in 1979, to put their hearts at ease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China (1990) Consultative Committee for the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bill of Rights Bulletin (1996), 4 (3) Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. and Chan, J. (eds) (1996) Hong Kongs Bill of Rights: Two Years Before 1997, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, D. (1996) Speech in the United States, mimeo, Attorney-General’s Chambers, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai, Y. (1995) ‘Back to Basics : The Provisional Legislature and the Basic Law’, Hong Kong Law Journal, 25 (1), pp. 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1990) ‘The Separation of Powers’ in P. Wesley-Smith (ed.) Hong Kong s Basic Law: Problems and Prospects, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1993) The Common Law of England in the Special Administrative Region’ in R. Wacks (ed.) Hong Kong, China and 1997: Essays in Legal Theory, ch. 1, Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1994a) Constitutional and Administrative Law in Hong Kong, 2nd edn, Longman Asia, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1994b) The Sources of Hong Kong Law, Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1995) ‘Judges and the Through Train’, Hong Kong Law Journal, 25 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith, P. (1996) ‘Judicial Review of Legislation’, Hong Kong Law Journal, 26 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Window, 10 November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Peter Wesley-Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wesley-Smith, P. (1998). Legal Institutions and the Law. In: Scott, I. (eds) Institutional Change and the Political Transition in Hong Kong. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26296-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics