Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, a minimum level of consumption is introduced into each person’s utility-maximization problem in order to explore the general equilibrium implication of our particular specification of the minimum consumption constraint for the analysis of demand function. There are at least two ways to specify a minimum level of consumption in a person’s utility-maximization problem. The first is to specify a fixed amount of consumption in a person’s utility function such that the contribution of consumption to utility is positive only if the consumption level is greater than that fixed amount. This is analogous to the specification of a fixed input cost in a production function. Compared to the utility function without the minimum level of consumption, this specification is equivalent to shifting the indifference curve up the right-hand side. If the original utility function is of Cobb-Douglas or log Cobb-Douglas, such a way of introducing the minimum level of consumption will generate a linear expenditure system, proposed by Stone (1954). However, a minimum level of consumption in the real world is often associated with a constraint for the utility-maximization problem instead of with the shift of the indifference curve that represents tastes. If the minimum level of consumption is specified as a constraint for the utility-maximization problem, then marginal analysis that is based on interior solutions does not work because corner solutions may take place.
The author is grateful to the Center for East Asian Studies, the University of Chicago, for their support.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baumgardner, J. (1988), ‘The Division of Labor, Local Markets, and Worker Organization’, Journal of Political Economy, 96(3) 509–27.
Becker, G. (1981), A Treatise on the Family (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Becker, L. and Cooper, K. (1969), Modern History (Morristown, Silver Burdett).
Becker, G. and Murphy, K. (1992), ‘The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 1137–60.
Borland, J. and Yang, X. (1992), ‘Specialization and a New Approach to Economic Organization and Growth’, American Economic Review, 82, 386–91.
Borland, J. and Yang, X. (1994), ‘Specialization, Product Development, Evolution of the Institution of the Firm, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5, 19–42.
Buchanan, J. (1994), ‘The Return to Increasing Retums’, in J. Buchanan and Y. Yoon (eds), The Return to Increasing Retums (Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press).
Buchanan, J. and Stubblebine, W. (1962), ‘Externality’, EconOmica, 29, 371–84.
Coase, R. (1946), ‘The Marginal Cost Controversy’, Economica, 13, 169–82.
Coase, R. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
Friedman, D. (1987), ‘Cold Homes in Warm Climates and Vice Versa: a Paradox of Rational Heating’, Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1089–97.
Houthakker, M. (1956), ‘Economics and Biology: Specialization and Speciation’, Kyklos, 9, 181–9.
Kendrick, D. (1978), The Planning of Industrial Investment Programs — A Methodology (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press).
Kim, S. (1989), ‘Labor Specialization and the Extent of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, 97: 692–709.
Lievowitz, S. and Margolis, S. (1994), ‘Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 133–50.
Little, I. and Mirrlees, J. (1980), Manual of Industrial Project Analysis in Developing Countries (Paris: OECD).
Locay, L. (1990), ‘Economic Development and the Division of Production between Households and Markets’, Journal of Political Economy, 98: 965–82.
Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, 8th edn (New York, Macmillan: 1948).
Rosen, S. (1978), ‘Substitution and the Division of Labor’, Economica, 45, 235–50.
Rosen, S. (1983), ‘Specialization and Human Capital’, Journal of Labor Economics, 1, 43–9.
Smith, A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. E. Cannan (reprint, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976).
Stigler, G.J. (1951), ‘The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, 59, 185–93.
Stone, J. (1954), ‘Linear Expenditure Systems and Demand Analysis: An Application to the Pattern of British Demand’, Economic Journal, 64, 511–27.
Wen, M. (1994), ‘An Analytical Framework with Consumer-producers, Economies of Specialization, and Transaction Costs’, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Monash University.
Yang, X. (1991), ‘Development, Structural Changes, and Urbanization’, Journal of Development Economics, 34, 199–222.
Yang, X. (1994), ‘Endogenous vs. Exogenous Comparative Advantages and Economies of Specialization vs. Economies of Scale’, Journal of Economics, 60, 29–54.
Yang, X. and Borland, J. (1991), ‘A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 460–82.
Yang, X. and Ng, Y.-K. (1993), Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeconomic Framework (Amsterdam, North-Holland).
Yang, X. and Ng, Y.-K. (1995), ‘Theory of the Firm and Structure of Residual Rights’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26, 107–28.
Yang, X. and Rice, R. (1994), ‘An Equilibrium Model Endogenizing the Emergence of a Dual Structure between the Urban and Rural Sectors’, Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 346–68.
Yang, X. and Shi, H. (1992), ‘Specialization and Product Diversity’, American Economic Review, 82, 392–8.
Young, A. (1928), ‘Increasing Retums and Economic Progress’, The Economic Journal 38, 527–42.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lio, M. (1998). The Inframarginal Analysis of Demand and Supply and the Relationship between a Minimum Level of Consumption and the Division of Labour. In: Arrow, K.J., Ng, YK., Yang, X. (eds) Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26255-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26255-7_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26257-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26255-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)