Policy Analysis in a Dynamic Model with Endogenous Specialization

  • Junxi Zhang


In recent years, there has been growing interest in studying the relationship between specialization and economic progress. This line of research, as exemplified in the pioneering work of Yang and Ng (1993), is a revival and formal extension of Adam Smith’s (1776) and Allyn Young’s (1928) proposition that increases in the division of labour will create economic growth. These studies develop a microeconomic framework that brings the analysis of economies of specialization, the division of labour and the structure of economic organization into the conventional general equilibrium paradigm. By integrating the consumption and production decisions, these models show that the endogenous evolution of the division of labour based on a tradeoff between economies of specialization and transaction costs may help explain a wide range of economic issues, from microeconomic, monetary to macroeconomic ones.


Fiscal Policy Market Structure Transaction Efficiency Productive Public Service Endogenous Specialization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barro, R.J. (1991), ‘Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Futagami, K., Morita, Y. and Shibata, A. (1993), ‘Dynamic Analysis of an Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1989), ‘Product Development and International Trade’, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee, J. (1992), ‘Optimal Magnitude and Composition of Government Spending’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 6, 423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Romer, P.M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Romer, P.M. (1994), ‘New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions’, Journal of Development Economics, 43, 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Samuelson, P.A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations ed. E. Canan (reprint, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  9. Yang, X. and Borland, J. (1991), ‘A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 460–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang, X. and Ng, Y.-K. (1993), Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeconomic Framework (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
  11. Young, A. (1928), ‘Increasing Retums and Economic Progress’, The Economic Journal, 38, 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junxi Zhang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations