Abstract
Feminist political theorists have exposed the ways in which women’s longstanding exclusion from the theory and practice of citizenship, in both its liberal and republican clothes, has been far from accidental. The universalist cloak of the abstract, disembodied individual has been cast aside to reveal a definitely male citizen and a white, heterosexual, non-disabled one at that. This is the starting point for this chapter. The focus then widens as the category woman is itself (temporarily) deconstructed to underline the ways in which women’s exclusion from citizenship is mediated by other social divisions such as class, ‘race’, disability, sexuality and age. This, it will be argued, does not invalidate the project of engendering citizenship. It does, though, demonstrate the need for ‘a conception of citizenship which would accommodate all social cleavages simultaneously’ (Leca, 1992, p. 30). While attempts to elaborate such a conception demonstrate the difficulties, I will argue that this is the direction citizenship theory has to take, in relation to citizenship both as a status and a practice, if it is to match up to its inclusionary and universalist claims. Thus, rejecting the ‘false universalism’ of traditional citizenship theory does not mean abandoning citizenship as a universalist goal.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1997 Ruth Lister
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lister, R. (1997). A Differentiated Universalism. In: Campling, J. (eds) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26209-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26209-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-53488-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26209-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)