Skip to main content

Incentive Distortions in Developing Agriculture in South Africa and Implications for Tenure Reform

  • Chapter
Contemporary Economic Issues

Abstract

The political transformation in South Africa is a political marvel. One reason why this was accomplished is that potential conflict areas were diffused by pre-emptive steps taken before democratic elections. In terms of land distribution, mechanisms were set in place allowing for land transfers from state and predominantly white-owned commercial farms to small-scale black farmers. These steps are required to alleviate the extreme skewedness of land access, reflected by the fact that the white minority owns about 87 per cent of South Africa’s agricultural land. The new government has proposed various resettlement models to achieve land transfers to previously disenfranchised black farmers, ranging from private ownership to group resettlement (LAPC, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atwood, D. A. (1990) ‘Land Registration in Africa: The Impact on Agricultural Production’, World Development, vol. 18, pp. 659–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, R. and M. Roth (1990) ‘Land Tenure and Investment in African Agriculture: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 28, pp. 265–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, R. H. Jr (1984) ‘Fenced and Open-range Ranching: The Commercialization of Pastoral Land and Livestock in Africa’, in J. R. Simpson and P. Evangelou (eds), Livestock Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Constraints, Prospects, Policy (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 261–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembridge, T. J. (1986) ‘An Overview of Agricultural and Rural Development Problems in Less Developed Areas of Southern Africa’, Development Southern Africa, 3(1), pp. 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1986) Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. and R. C. Bishop (1975) ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy’, Natural Resources Journal, vol. 15, pp. 713–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. R. (1990a) ‘Land Tenure in Black Rural Areas: Social and Political Underpinnings’, unpublished paper, Department of Development Administration and Politics, University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. R. (1990b) ‘Mythology and Mystery Tours in Land Reform: Getting Some Focus on the South African Debate’, Development Southern Africa, vol. 7, pp. 535–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1982) The Control of Resources (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G. and T. Onchan (1987) ‘Land Ownership Security and Farm Investment in Thailand’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 69, pp. 311–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, R. K. (1980) ‘Tradition, Social Justice and Land Reform in Central Botswana’, Journal of African Law, vol. 24(1), pp. 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B. R. Siegfried and C. Sunter (1989) South African Environments into the 21st Century (Cape Town: Human & Rousseau).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. A. (1983) ‘Subsistence Farmers or Non-Farmers?’, unpublished BSc. (Agric.) thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAPC (1993) ‘Options for Land Reform and Rural Restructuring in South Africa’, revised version of the LAPC paper presented at the Land Redistributions Options Conference, Johannesburg, South Africa, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, S. W., J. C. Riddell and J. W. Bennett (1984) ‘Land Tenure Policy in African Livestock Development’, in J. R. Simpson and P. Evangelou (eds), Livestock Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Constraints, Prospects, Policy (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 245–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenta, G. (1982) ‘Land, Labour and Capital in KwaZulu: Some Failures of Coincidence’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 1(2), pp. 307–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, A. (1986) Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm-Household Economics and the Food Crisis (Cape Town: David Philip).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyne, M. C. (1989) ‘Distortion of Incentives for Farm Households in KwaZulu’, unpublished PhD thesis in Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyne, M. C. and M. Roth (1994) ‘Land Rental Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Efficiency, Equity and Institutional Change’, unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, C. C. and G. K. Coetzee (1988) ‘Estimation of Demand for Farmer Support Services’, in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Association of Southern Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa (26–27 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, C. C., D. Weinerand and N. Vink (1989) ‘Land Use, Agricultural Productivity and Farming Systems in Southern Africa’, unpublished report, Development Bank of Southern Africa, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, G. M. and W. L. Nieuwoudt (1995) ‘The Interaction between Land Tenure Security and Agricultural Productivity in Zimbabwe’, Agrekon, vol. 34(4), pp. 288–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwoudt, W. L. (1990) ‘Efficiency of Land Use’, paper presented at the AEASE Conference, Durban (16–18 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Place, F. and P. Hazell (1993) ‘Productivity Effects of Indigenous Land Tenure Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(1), pp. 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place, F., M. Roth and P. Hazell (1994) ‘Land Tenure Security and Agricultural Performance in Africa: Overview of Research Methodology’ in Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa, ed. J. W. Bruce and S. E. Migot-Adholla (Iowa: Kendall Hunt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. F. (1981) ‘Common Property Externalities: Isolation, Assurance, and Resource Depletion in a Traditional Grazing Context’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 63, pp. 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. F. (1984) ‘Strategic Interdependence Models of Property Rights’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66, pp. 807–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. A. (1990) (Managing Director, LIMA Rural Development Foundation, Umzumbe), personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. N. and M. C. Lyne (1995) ‘Is Tenure Secure in Communal Areas? Some Empirical Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal’, Agrekon, vol. 34(4), pp. 178–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nieuwoudt, W.L., Moor, G., Baber, R. (1998). Incentive Distortions in Developing Agriculture in South Africa and Implications for Tenure Reform. In: Mundlak, Y. (eds) Contemporary Economic Issues. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26188-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics