The Arab Economies, the Uruguay Round Predicament, and the European Union Wildcard

  • Ishac Diwan
  • Chang–Po Yang
  • Zhi Wang

Abstract

These are revolutionary times in the global economy. The lives of workers in different parts of the world are increasingly intertwined. The embrace of market–based development strategies by many developing and post–centrally planned economies, the opening of international markets, and great advances in the ease with which goods, capital, and ideas flow around the world are bringing new opportunities to billions of people. Are these favorable developments from the point of view of the economies of the Middle East and North Africa? The stakes are clearly high. During the 1970s and early 1980s labor migration and official aid were sources of growth. Now, other sources of foreign exchange will have to be found to finance import needs. The globalization of trade promises to open new markets, but it also increases competition. East Asia’s export–led boom started in the 1970s when

Keywords

Migration Europe Shipping Income Syria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armington, Paul S. 1969, “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinuished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Papers 16: 159–76.Google Scholar
  2. Balassa, Bela. 1965. “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage,” The Manchester School 33: 99–124.Google Scholar
  3. Brook, A., D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus. 1988. GAMS: A User’s Guide. San Francisco, Calif.: Scientific PressGoogle Scholar
  4. de Melo, Jaime and Sherman Robinson, 1989. “Product Differentiation and the Treatment of Foreign Trade in Computable General Equilibrium Models of Small Economies,” Journal of International Economics, 27: 47–67.Google Scholar
  5. Diwan, Ishac, and Mike Walton, 1995. “Opening Up and Distribution in the Middle East and North Africa: The Poor, the Unemployed, and the Public Sector,” Washington, D.C.: World Bank Google Scholar
  6. Harrison, Glenn W., Thomas F. Rutherford, and David G. Tarr. 1995. “Quantifying the Uruguay Round.” In Will Martin and Alan Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Hertel, Thomas W.(ed.), 1996. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoekman, Bernard. 1995. “The WTO, the EU, and the Arab World: Trade Policy Priorities and Pitfalls,” Washington, D.C.: World Bank Google Scholar
  9. Kreinin, E. Morderchai, 1991. International Economics: A Policy Approach, 6th eds, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar
  10. Leamer, E., 1984. Sources of International Comparative Advantage,. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, Jeffrey D., Sherman Robinson and Zhi Wang, 1995. “Beyond the Uruguay Round: The Implication of an Asian Free Trade Area,” China Economic Review – An International Journal, 6(1): 35–90.Google Scholar
  12. Shoven J. B. and J. Whalley. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Wang, Zhi, 1994. “The Impact of Economic Integration Among Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis,” Ph.D dissertation. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Wang, Zhi and James Slagle, 1996. “An Object–Oriented Approach to Formulate Applied General Equilibrium Models,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20: 209–36.Google Scholar
  15. Whalley, J., 1985. Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Research Forum 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishac Diwan
  • Chang–Po Yang
  • Zhi Wang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations