Skip to main content
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Following the approval of the first stage political reforms, the more controversial second stage was presented to Legco in late June of 1994. After Seventeen and a half hours of discussion, the whole package, as put forward by Patten, was endorsed. This was only after an amendment proposed by the Liberal Party, to approximate to what they thought China would have wanted, had been defeated by just one vote and a private member’s bill submitted by independent legislator, Emily Lau, proposing a fully elected legislature was voted down, again by just one vote. The debate was so emotive that one legislator broke into tears while making his speech. The Hong Kong Standard published a selection of views expressed during the debate, in favour of and against the reforms, as follows:1

Why is the Liberal Party so afraid of democracy? Why seek to appease China with a pale and anaemic copy of the type of election China would want to set up in 1997? We must reject the undemocratic monstrosity before us.

Independent legislator Jimmy McGregor

The abolition (by China) of representative institutions which are carefully constituted, properly elected, and which command the support of our people cannot be conducive to a smooth transition.

Chief Secretary Anson Chan

No one on earth would believe that there would be continuity as a result of the passing of the (government’s) 1992 package. Only an idiot would believe that.

Liberal Party leader Allen Lee

The hopes of 1997 have been crushed by Mr Patten who believed he knew how to deal with China.

Independent legislator Elsie Tu

No matter which package is passed today it cannot achieve the through-train, and Hong Kong people will suffer profound damage.

Independent legislator Eric Li

Are we crawling towards 1997 or are we walking tall?

United Democrats legislator Szeto Wah

The wish of the Hong Kong people is thai we have a high degree of autonomy from Beijing. They want you to do what they can’t do themselves.

United Democrats leader Martin Lee

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. S. K. Tsang, ‘The Economy’, in D. H. MacMillen and S.W. Man (eds.) The Other Hong Kong Report 1994 (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1994) pp. 125–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Much of this paragraph draws on Hung Wing-tat, ‘The Environment’, in S. Y. L. Cheng and S. M. H. Sze The Other Hong Kong Report 1995 (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press) pp. 343–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Rice, ‘Human rights’ in The Other Hong Kong Report: 1995 (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1995) pp. 103–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 John Flowerdew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flowerdew, J. (1998). A Lame Duck Government?. In: The Final Years of British Hong Kong. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26135-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics