Skip to main content

Two Futures for Police Cautioning

  • Chapter
Policing Futures

Abstract

In 1993, the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice recommended that police cautioning be governed by statute. This recommendation reflected the failure of advice in successive Home Office Circulars to promote consistency across police force areas, in terms of both policy approaches and decision-making practices. Yet, despite this, given the ineffectiveness of existing national standards for cautioning, it is difficult to foresee the difference that a statutory approach will make, especially as there are definite structural, organizational and occupational limits to achieving a satisfactory level of uniformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashworth, A. (1984) ‘Prosecution, police and public — a guide to good gatekeeping?’, The Howard Journal, vol. 23, no 2 (June) pp. 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (1995) Rules and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski, Z. and Nelken, D. (1981) ‘Discretion as a social problem’, in M. Adler and S. Asquith (eds) Discretion and Welfare (London: Heinemann) pp. 247–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. P. (1992) ‘The myth of discretion’, in K. Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 129–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, A. K. (1985) ‘Guide-lines on cautioning — identifying the principles’, Justice of the Peace, 18 May, pp. 311–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, A. K. and Pease, K. (1986) Crime and Punishment: Interpreting the Data (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, P. (1985) ‘Two cheers for cautioning circular’, Justice of the Peace, 18 May, pp. 310–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1979) The punitive city: notes on the dispersal of control’, Contemporary Crisis, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 341–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1981) ‘Footprints in the sand: a further report on criminology and the sociology of deviance in Britain’, in M. Fitzgerald et al. (eds), Crime and Society (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification (Oxford: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1988) Against Criminology (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., Boucherat, J. and Watson, D. (1989) ‘Pre-court decision making in Juvenile Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 219–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. C. (1969) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditchfield, J. A. (1976) Police Cautioning in England and Wales, Home Office Research Study No. 37 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, D. (1992) ‘Legal regulation and policing practice’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 1, pp. 515–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. M. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1991) ‘Police cautioning and the young adult offender’, Criminal Law Review: 598–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. and Wilkinson, C. (1990) ‘Variations in police cautioning policy and practice in England and Wales’, The Howard Journal, vol. 29, no. 3 (August) pp. 155–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. and Bennett, T. (1981) ‘Police cautioning of juveniles in London’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 21, no. 2 (April) pp. 123–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, S. and Thomas, P. A. (eds) (1994) Justice and Efficiency? The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. J. and Mawby, R. I. (1982) ‘Juvenile delinquency and police discretion in an inner city area’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 22, no. 1 (January) pp. 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. and George, M. (1992) ‘Cautions for cannabis’, Policing, vol. 8, no. 1: pp. 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, D. J. (1990) Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, D. J. (1994) ‘Regulating pre-trial decisions’, in N. Lacey (ed.), A Reader on Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, H. and Tutt, N. (1987) ‘Police cautioning of juveniles: the continuing practice of diversity’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 367–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilling, D. (1996) ‘Policing, crime prevention and partnerships’, in F. Leishman, B. Loveday and S. Savage (eds), Core Issues in Policing (London: Longman) pp. 101–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, R. and Jefferson, T. (1987) Interpreting Policework (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunhut, M. (1956) Juvenile Offenders Before the Courts (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. and Hill, M. (1984) The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, 1st edn (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. and Webb, D. (1987) Welfare, Power and Juvenile Justice (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. (ed.) (1992) The Uses of Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1972) ‘Review article: policy analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S. (1983) Inside the British Police (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1978) Circular 70/1978: The Cautioning of Offenders (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1984) Cautioning By The Police: A Consultative Document (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1985) Circular 14/1985: The Cautioning of Offenders (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1990) Circular 59/1990: The Cautioning of Offenders (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1994) Circular 18/1994: The Cautioning of Offenders (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1994) Criminal Statistics (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1995) Digest 3: Information on the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office, Northern Ireland Office and Scottish Office (1993) Inquiry Into Police Responsibilities and Rewards: The Sheehy Report, Vol. I: Appendixes Vol. II, Cmnd 2280I:II (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hullin, R. P. (1985) ‘The cautioning of juvenile offenders’, Justice of the Peace, 18 May, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W. I. (1978) Policy Analysis (London: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Newburn, T. and Smith, D. J. (1994) Democracy and Policing (London: Policy Studies Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, C., Norris, C. and Fielding, N. (1992) Negotiating Nothing: Police Decision Making in Disputes (Aldershot: Avebury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidner, D. H. (1985) ‘Cautioning’, Justice of the Peace, 18 May, pp. 308–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (1992) ‘The jurisprudence of discretion: escaping the legal paradigm’, in K. Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 361–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, S. F. (1981) ‘Juveniles and the police’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 21, no. 1 (January) pp. 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, S. F. and Nathan, G. (1983) ‘Selecting delinquents for cautioning in the London Metropolitan Area’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 23, no. 2 (April) pp. 128–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, G. and Tarling, R. (1985) ‘Police force cautioning: policy and practice’, The Howard Journal, vol. 24, no. 2 (May) pp. 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leishman, F., Cope, S. and Starie, P. (1996) ‘Reinventing and restructuring: towards a new policing order’, in F. Leishman, B. Loveday and S. Savage (eds), Core Issues in Policing (London: Longman) 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. K. and Hawkins, K. (1989) ‘Police decision making’, in M. Weatheritt (ed.), Police Research: Some Future Prospects (Aldershot: Avebury in association with the Police Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. M., Sanford, J. F. and Murray, K. (1981) Children Out of Court (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, F. H. and Avison, N. H. (1968) Crime in England and Wales (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville, M. and Sanders, A. (1992) ‘Fairness and the CPS’, New Law Journal, 31 January, pp. 120–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville, M. Leng, R. and Sanders, A. (1991) Constructing the Case for the Prosecution (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M. (1990) ‘Net widening: vagaries in the use of a concept’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 30 (Spring) pp. 121–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A., Giller, H., Szwed, E. and Geach, H. (1980) Justice for Children (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mott, J. (1983) ‘Police decisions for dealing with juvenile offenders’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 23, no. 3 (July) pp. 249–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelken, D. (1976) ‘Extending the use of police cautions: a critical appraisal’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 360–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (1995) Crime and Criminal Justice Policy (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonet, P. and Selznick, P. (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paling, Her Honour Judge Helen (1996) ‘Risk: a sentencer’s perspective’, verbal presentation at The National Association of Probation Officers Annual Conference, Otterburn, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchett, K. W. and McClean, J. D. (1965) ‘Decision-making in juvenile cases’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 699–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1986) ‘Diversion from the juvenile court: a history of inflation and a critique of progress’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 26, no. 3 (July) pp. 212–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (1991) Chief Constables (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (1992) The Politics of the Police, 2nd edn (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (1993) The Runciman Report, Cmnd 2263 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (1981) Final Report, Cmnd 8092 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. (1988) ‘The limits to diversion from prosecution’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 28, no. 4 (Autumn) pp. 513–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. (1992) ‘Discretion and rules: a lawyer’s view’ in K. Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 47–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J. and Vagg, J. (1988) Policing by the Public (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Willmore, J. and Duff, P. (1985) Victims and the Criminal Justice System (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1981) ‘Discretionary decision-making in social work’, in M. Adler and S. Asquith (eds), Discretion and Welfare (London: Heinemann) pp. 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, J. G. (1969) ‘A study of the preventive aspect of police work with juveniles’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 407–14, 472–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steer, D. (1970) ‘Police Cautions: A Study in the Exercise of Police Discretion’, Occasional Paper No. 2, Penal Research Unit (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, E. and Casale, S. (eds) (1992) Criminal Justice Under Stress (London: Blackstone).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutt, N. (1985) ‘Proper juvenile cautions’, Police Review, vol. 93 (January— July) pp. 1267–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutt, N. and Giller, H. (1983) ‘Police cautioning of juveniles: the practice of diversity’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 587–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, D. (1990) ‘Adult cautioning’, Policing, vol. 16 (Spring) pp. 383–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, D. (1991) ‘The effects of Home Office guide-lines on the cautioning of offenders’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 591–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. and Evans, R. (1990) ‘Police cautioning of juveniles: the impact of Home Office Circular 14/1985’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 165–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1990) Femininity in Dissent (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1991) An Inside Job (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, E. (1997). Two Futures for Police Cautioning. In: Francis, P., Davies, P., Jupp, V. (eds) Policing Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25980-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics