Skip to main content

Quantitative Flexibility in the US Labour Market

  • Chapter
Labour Productivity and Flexibility

Abstract

The US labour market is widely viewed as a paragon of neo-classical flexibility. Wages respond rapidly to changes in supply and demand, with little institutional intervention. Firms hire and fire at will, with few government or union restrictions. Spells of unemployment are short, and unemployment benefits modest.

Thanks go to Steve Davis and Phil Levine for providing some of the data used in this paper and to Daniel Hamermesh and Susan Houseman for guiding us through the literature on employment-output elasticities. We appreciate the research assistence of Mark Sisak and Darrin Curtis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, K.G. and Houseman, S.N. (1989) ‘Job security and work force adjustment: How different are US and Japanese practices?’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3, pp. 500–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, K. and Houseman, N. (1993) Job Security in America, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S.G. (1995) ‘Updated notes on the interindustry wage structure, 1890–1990’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48 (January), pp. 305–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J. and Katz, L.F. (1992) ‘Regional Evolutions’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J. (1994) The Wage Curve, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Community (CEC) (1991) European Economy, 47 (March), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations (1994) Fact Finding Report (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, D. (1956) ‘The interindustry wage structure: 1399–1950’, American Economic Review, 46(2) (June), pp. 353–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.J. and Haitiwanger, J. (1992) ‘Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (August), pp. 819–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.J., Haltiwanger, J. and Schuh, S. (1994) Gross Job Flows, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F.X., Neumark, D. and Polsky, D. (1994) ‘Job stability in the United States’, NBER, Working Paper, 4859 (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., Roberts, M. and Samuelson, L. (1989) ‘Plant turnover and gross employment flows in the US manufacturing sector’, Journal of Labor Economics, 7(1) (January), pp. 48–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report of the President (1994) Economic Report of the President, 1994, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office. The Economist (1995) (March 10), Second to last page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Employee Benefit Research Institute (1994) ‘Baby boomers in retirement: What are their prospects?’, EBRIIssue Brief, 151 (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H.S. (1995). ‘Are lifetime jobs disappearing? Job duration in the United States: 1973–1993’, NBER, Working Paper 5014 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (1994) Reducing Unemployment: Current issues and policy options, Kansas City, Federal Reserve Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. and Katz, L.F. (1994) ‘Rising wage inequality: The United States vs. other advanced countries’, in R.B. Freeman (ed.), Working Under Different Rules, New York, Russell Sage, pp. 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1985) ‘Eurosclerosis’, Kiel Institute for World Economics, Discussion Paper, 112 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D.S. (1994) ‘Employment protection: Theoretical implications and some US evidence’, in C.F. Buechremann (ed.), Employment Security and Labor Market behavior, Ithaca, NY, ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseman, S.N. (1991) Industrial Restructuring with Job Security: The case of European steel, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseman, S.N. and Abraham, K.G. (1993) ‘Female workers as a buffer in the Japanese economy’, American Economic Review, 83 (May), pp. 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S. and Jackman, R. (1991) Unemployment, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E.P. (1990) ‘Job security provisions and employment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105 (August), pp. 699–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. (1987) ‘In the wrong place at the wrong time: The extent of frictional and structural unemployment’, in K. Lang and J. Leonard (eds), Unemployment and the Structure of Labor Markets, New York, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (1982) ‘Emerging arteriosclerosis of the Western economies: Consequences for the less developed countries’, India International Centre Quarterly, 1, pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, B.C. (1994) ‘Employment-based health insurance and job mobility: Is there evidence of job-lock?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (February), pp. 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, L. and Bernstein, J. (1994) The State of Working America, 1994–95, Washington, DC, Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1990) Employment Outlook, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1991) Labour Force Statistics, 1969–1989, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994) OECD Jobs Study: Evidence and explanations, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.F., Burkhauser, R.V. and Myers, D.A. (1990) Passing the Torch: The influence of economic incentives on work and retirement, Kalamazoo, Mass., W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Retirement and Health Survey (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, S.H. (1950) ‘Notes on the structure of wages’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 32 (1) (February), pp. 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnerton, K.A. and Wial, H. (1995) ‘Is job stability declining in the US economy?’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48 (January), pp. 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topel, R. (1993) ‘What have we learned from empirical studies of unemployment’, paper presented at AEA Meetings (Anaheim, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1993) Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1993, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census of Population (1970, 1980, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor (monthly) Washington, DC, Employment and Earnings, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allen, S.G., Freeman, R.B. (1997). Quantitative Flexibility in the US Labour Market. In: Amadeo, E.J., Horton, S. (eds) Labour Productivity and Flexibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25977-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics