Introduction: Psychoanalysis and Law

  • Peter Goodrich
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)

Abstract

On Friday 4 May, 1984, while watching the Prime Minister of Quebec speaking on television, a disaffected young corporal in the Canadian army formed the idea of massacring the government of Quebec. Denis Lortie subsequently described this initial impulse in terms of a desire to attack the National Assembly and eliminate the ruling arti québequois, a party which had ‘done harm to the French language’. He would thus ‘destroy something which wanted to destroy the French language’. In various other formulations, Lortie expressed a wish to save the language by killing the government: ‘I will do some harm so as to do some good.’1

Keywords

Schizophrenia Dition Tral Rium Poss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Pierre Legendre, Le Crime du caporal Lortie: Traité sur le père, 1989, Paris: Fayard at 95.Google Scholar
  2. Alain Pottage, ‘Crime and Culture: The Relevance of the Psychoanalytical’ (1992) 55 Modern Law Review 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Marie-Jeanne Segers, ‘Actualité de la pensée de Pierre Legendre’ (1991) 27 Revue Interdisciplinaire d’Etudes juridiques 99Google Scholar
  4. Anton Schütz, ‘Sons of Writ, Sons of Wrath: Pierre Legendre’s Critique of Rational Law-Giving’ (1995) 16 Cardozo Law Review 979.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    On the some recent examples of the use of psychoanalysis in Anglo-American jurisprudence, see Alain Pottage, ‘Recreating Difference’ (1994) 5 Law and Critique 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. David Caudill, ‘Freud and Critical Legal Studies: Contours of a Radical Socio-Legal Psychoanalysis’ (1991) 66 Indiana Law Review 651Google Scholar
  7. David Caudill, ‘Lacan and Law: Networking with the Big Other’ (1992) 1 Studies in Psychoanalytic Theory 25Google Scholar
  8. David Caudill, Lacan and the Law, 1997, New Jersey: Humanities Press; and also Drucilla CornellGoogle Scholar
  9. ‘What Takes Place in the Dark’, in Transformations, 1994, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    The expression is taken from Julia Kristeva, In the Beginning was Love: Psychoanalysis and Faith, 1987, New York: Columbia University Press, at p. 35Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Digest 1.3. 2. The passage continues: ‘Lex est omnium divinarum human-arumque rerum regina’ [law is the queen of all things divine and human] See the discussion in Legendre, L’lnestimable objet de la transmission, 1985, Paris: Fayard, at 137.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    See Legendre, The Other Dimension of Law’, trans. Yifat Hachamovitch, in David Carlson and Peter Goodrich (eds), Psychoanalysis and Jurisprudence: Essays in Law and the Postmodern Mind, 1997, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Linda Mills, ‘On the Other Side of Silence: Affective Lawyering and Intimate Abuse’ (1996) 86 Cornell Law Review 814.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    This question is lengthily and beautifully elaborated in Yifat Hachamovitch, ‘In emulation of the clouds: An essay on the obscure object of judgement’, in Costas Douzinas et al. (eds), Politics, Postmodernity and Critical Legal Studies, 1994, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Digest 50.1.33, discussed in Legendre, Le Désir politique de Dieu. Etude sur les montages de l’Etat et du droit (1988) Paris: Fayard, at 371–6.Google Scholar
  16. Tim Murphy, ‘Memorising Politics of Ancient History’ (1987) 50 Modern Law Review 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    Legendre’s views on what he terms the twelfth-century revolution of the interpreters can be found in Les Enfants du texte: Etude sur la fonction parentale des Etats, 1992, Paris: Fayard. For other attempts to address this theme, see Alan Watson, The Civil Law Tradition, 1981, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Harold Berman, Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition, 1983, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Donald Kelley, ‘Gaius Noster: Substructures of Western Legal Thought’ (1979) 84 American Historical Review 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald Kelley, The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition, 1990, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 17.
    This thesis is elaborated most famously in Jacques Lacan, ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I’, in Ecrits: A Selection, 1977, London: Tavistock. For an elaboration of the mirror stage with respect to the formation of institutional identity, see Legendre, Dieu au mirroir. Etude sur l’institution des images, 1994, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  22. 18.
    Thus David Caudill, ‘Lacan and Law’, 25: ‘If this study is anything — scholarly, scientific — at all, it is personal, implicatory. In trying to maintain a cautious distance from a theory — Lacan’s — postulating that such distance is an illusion, one fears to be only striking a pose.’ See also Peter Gabel, ‘The Phenomenology of Rights-Consciousness and the Pact of the Withdrawn Selves’ (1984) 62 Texas Law Review 1563.Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    For an analysis of another case in which a son kills his father (‘It is impossible to blow open the top of a man’s head, says the judge in Moloney, a case about a man who blows open the top of a man’s head, to unshell it, as it were, so as to examine his thinking like an oyster, or a watch-spring, or a nut’), see Yifat Hachamovitch, ‘The Dummy. An Essay on Malice Prepensed’, in Peter Rush, Shaun McVeigh and Alison Young (eds), Criminal Legal Doctrine, 1997, Aldershot: DartmouthGoogle Scholar
  24. 20.
    Sigmund Freud, Totem and Taboo: Resemblances between the Psychic Life of Savages and Neurotics, 1939, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    Kenneth Setton, Christian Attitudes towards the Emperor in the Fourth Century, 1941, New York: Columbia Univesity Press, 196.Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    See particularly Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, 1961, London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    Legendre, L’Amour du censeur. Essai sure l’ordre dogmatique, 1974, Paris: Seuil, at 14.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    See Legendre, Paroles poétiques échappées du texte. Leçons sur la communication industrielle, 1982, Paris: Seuil, at 12Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Legendre, L’Empire de la vérité, 1983, Paris: Fayard, at 26.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    See Legendre, L’Inestimable objet de la transmission. Etude sur le principe généalogique en Occident, 1985, Paris: Fayard at 42Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    For an instructive account of Freud’s concept of double reading, see Sarah Kofman, The Childhood of Art. An Interpretation of Freud’s Aesthetics, 1988, New York: Columbia University Press, ch. 1.Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Legendre, Les Enfants du texte. Etude sur la fonction parentale des Etats, 1992, Paris: Fayard, at 55.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    See Legendre, ‘Le droit romain, modèle et langage: De la signification de l’Utrumque lus’, reprinted in Legendre, Ecrits juridiques du Moyen age occidental, 1985, London: Variorum.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    On the role of the sovereign as ‘nursing father’, see Roger Coke, Elements of Power and Subjection or the Causes of all Humane, Christian and Legal Society, 1660, London: T. Newcomb, at 98Google Scholar
  35. Peter Goodrich, Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law, 1995, Berkeley: University of California Press, at 223–45.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Legendre, Jouir du pouvoir. Traité sur la bureaucratie patriote, 1976, Paris: Editions de Minuit, at 190.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Legendre, Désir politique de Dieu, at 225-6: ‘Note that one of the central constructions of civil law, that which, following Justinian’s terminology, we call the law of persons, literally derives from persona — referring initially to an actor’s mask — and allows me to translate the formula de iure personarum by “of the law of masks”. In all institutional systems the political subject is reproduced through masks. This translation also contributes to the rehabilitation of the problematic of the image at the heart of the legal order.’ For commentary on this point, see Peter Goodrich, ‘Law’s Emotional Body: Image and Aesthetic in the Work of Pierre Legendre’, in P. Goodrich, Languages of Laiv: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks, 1990, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    Legendre, L’Inestimable objet de la transmission. Etude sur le principe généalogique en Occident, 1985, Paris: Fayard at 140.Google Scholar
  39. 45.
    For a technical account of the reception, see Legendre, La Pénétration du droit romain dans le droit canonique classique, 1964, Paris: Imprimerie Jouve.Google Scholar
  40. P. Goodrich, Reading the Law, 1986, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. 46.
    On the faith which attaches to instruments (that is to say to texts), see Legendre, Désir politique de Dieu, at 289-97; and also Legendre, ‘Expertise d’un texte’, in La Pyschanalyse, est-elle une histoire juive?, 1981, Paris: Seuil, at 93–113.Google Scholar
  42. 49.
    See François Hotman, Anti-Tribonian ou discours d’un grand et renommé iurisconsulte sur l’estude des loix, 1603 edn, Paris: Perrier, at 120Google Scholar
  43. 50.
    Legendre, Jouir du pouvoir, at 162. See also Jacques Lenoble and François Ost, Droit, mythe et raison, 1981, Bruxelles: Presse Universitaire de Saint Louis.Google Scholar
  44. 56.
    Legendre, Désir politique de Dieu, at 316. With respect to the philological views of Guillaume Budé, see De philologia, 1536, Paris: Vascosan, at 47 and 143Google Scholar
  45. 57.
    This Pauline distinction can be found taken up in Francis Bacon, The Elements of the Common Lawes of England (London: I. More, 1630) at A 2Google Scholar
  46. 58.
    See particularly Sir John Davies, A Discourse of Law and Lawyers (1615) in A.B. Grosart (ed.), Sir John Davies: Complete Works. Vol. II (London: private circulation, 1876) at 275–7.Google Scholar
  47. John Selden, The Duello or Single Combat: From Antiquitie derived into this Kingdome of England (London: I. Helme, 1610) at 21–2.Google Scholar
  48. Donald Kelley, The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990) chapter 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 60.
    Sir Robert Wiseman, The Law of Laws or the Excellency of the Civil Law above all Humane Laws whatsoever (London: Royston, 1664) at 70.Google Scholar
  50. 62.
    On the significance of subauditio and subintellectio, see Ian Maclean, Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: The Case of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992) at 166–75.Google Scholar
  51. 64.
    For an eloquent elaboration of this point, see Alain Pottage, ‘The Paternity of Law’, in Douzinas et al. (eds), Politics, Postmodernity and Critical Legal Studies, 1994, London: Routledge, especially at 148–50.Google Scholar
  52. 65.
    Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection, 1977, London: Tavistock, at 296Google Scholar
  53. 66.
    Legendre, Le Crime du caporal Lortie, at 27-33; see also, Pierre Legendre, ‘Analecta’, in Alexandra Papageorgiou-Legendre, Filiation. Fondement généalogique de la psychanalyse, 1990, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  54. 71.
    Legendre, L’Inestimable objet de la transmission, at 172. See further, Alain Pottage, ‘A Unique and Different Subject of Law’ (1995) 16 Cardozo Law Review 1161Google Scholar
  55. 75.
    Sir John Fortescue, De laudibus legum Angliae, 1468, 1737 edn, London: Gosling, at 3.Google Scholar
  56. 79.
    Fortescue, De natura legis naturae, 1466, reprinted in The Works of Sir John Fortescue, 1869, London: private distribution, at 240 (portio est viscerum maternum).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Goodrich 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Goodrich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations