Skip to main content

Excessive Children: Textual Filiation and the Command of the Other

  • Chapter
Dissent and Marginality

Part of the book series: Studies in Literature and Religion ((SLR))

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

It could be said that the study of the child as a subject of discourse is in its infancy. With literary representations only arising in the last two hundred years and scientific discourse only giving focused treatment of the child in the last one hundred years, children seem to have had a marginal existence at best within the Western textual tradition. Peter Laslett’s familiar quote bears repeating: ‘these crowds and crowds of little children are strangely absent from the written record& There is something mysterious about the silence of all these multitudes of babes in arms, toddlers and adolescents, in the statements men made at the time about their own experience’.2

There are times in life when the question of knowing if one can think differently than one thinks, and perceive differently than one sees, is absolutely necessary if one is to go on looking and reflecting at all& (W)hat is philosophy today — philosophical activity, I mean — if it is not the critical work that thought brings to bear on itself? In what does it consist, if not in the endeavor to know how and to what extent it might be possible to think differently, instead of legitimating what is already known?

Michel Foucault1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michel Foucault, The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, vol. II, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Vintage Books, 1990) pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter Laslett, The World We Have Lost, p. 104. Quoted in John Boswell’s, The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph Hawes and N. Ray Hiner, Children in Historical and Comparative Perspective (New York: Greenwood Press, 1991) pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Two fine examples of this area of study are Lloyd de Mause, ‘The Evolution of Childhood’, in Tire History of Childhood (London: Souvenir Press, 1976) pp. 1–73

    Google Scholar 

  5. Linda Pollock’s Forgotten Children: Parent-Child relations from 1500–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983). While de Mause stresses the discontinuity of the cruel treatment of children in the past compared with the modern experience, Pollock suggests a historical continuity in parental sentiment towards children.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Boswell, The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance (New York: Pantheon Books) pp. 26–7. Hereafter cited in text as (KS). Also, see, David Archard Children: Rights and Childhood (New York: Routledge, 1993) pp. 23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hugh Cunningham, The Children of the Poor: Representations of Childhood since the Seventeenth Century (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peter Coveney, Poor Monkey: The Child in Literature (London: Rockliff, 1957), p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernard McGrane, Beyond Anthropology: Society and the Other (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989) pp. 85, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richard A. Cohen (ed.), Face to Face with Lévinas (Albany, New York: SUNY Press, 1986) p. 19. Hereafter cited in text as (FF).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lévinas, ‘Diachrony and Representation’, in Richard A. Cohen (trans.) Time and the Other (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1987) p. 99ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simon Critchley, The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Lévinas (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Emmanuel Lévinas, Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo, trans. Richard A. Cohen (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985) p. 60. Hereafter cited in text as (EI).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also, Emmanuel Lévinas, Time and the Other, trans. Richard A. Cohen (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1987) pp. 39ff. Hereafter cited in text as (TO).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert Bernasconi and Simon Critchley, eds, Re-Reading Lévinas (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1991) pp. 110–11. Hereafter cited in text as (RRL).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emmanuel Lévinas, Totality and Infinity, trans. Aiphonso Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969) p. 267. Hereafter cited in text as (77).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emmanuel Lévinas, Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, trans. Aiphonso Lingis (The Hague, The Netherlands: Martin Nijhoff Publishers, 1981) 184–5. Hereafter cited in text as (OB).

    Google Scholar 

  18. John Llewelyn, The Middle Voice of Ecological Conscience: A Chiasmic Reading of Responsibility in the Neighborhood of Lévinas, Heidegger and Others (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Emmanuel Lévinas, ‘God and Philosophy’, trans. Richard A. Cohen, in Sean Hand (ed.), The Lévinas Reader (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989) 179. Hereafter cited in text as (GP).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steven G. Smith, The Argument To the Other: Reason Beyond Reason in the Thought of Karl Barth and Emmanuel Lévinas (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983) p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mark C. Taylor, Altarity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987) p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 205. Emmanuel Lévinas, ‘The Trace of the Other’, in Mark C. Taylor (ed.), Deconstruction in Context: Literature and Philosophy (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983) p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Emmanuel Lévinas, Totalité et Infini (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1961) p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Benjamin Jowett (trans.), Irwin Edman (ed.), The Works of Plato (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1928) p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  25. John Boswell, ‘Expositio and Oblatio The Abandonment of Children and the Ancient and Medieval Family’, American Historical Review, LXXXIX (February 1984) 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teel, D.C. (1997). Excessive Children: Textual Filiation and the Command of the Other. In: Tsuchiya, K. (eds) Dissent and Marginality. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25936-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics