Abstract
Let us return … to Wilson’s reading [of Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw]1 which will be considered here not as a model ‘Freudian reading’, but as the illustration of a prevalent tendency as well as an inherent temptation of psychoanalytical interpretation as it undertakes to provide an ‘explanation’, or an ‘explication’ of a literary text. In this regard, Wilson’s later semi-retraction of this thesis is itself instructive: convinced by his detractors that for James the ghosts were real, that James’s conscious project or intention was to write a simple ghost story and not a madness story, Wilson does not, however, give up his theory that the ghosts consist of the neurotic hallucinations of the governess, but concedes in a note:
One is led to conclude that, in The Turn of the Screw, not merely is the governess self-deceived, but that James is self-deceived about her. (Wilson, note added 1948, p. 143)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
[Ed.] See Edmund Wilson, ‘The Ambiguity of Henry James’, in The Triple Thinkers (Harmondsworth, 1962).
[Ed.] Page references are to Henry James, The Turn of the Screw, ed. Robert Kimbrough (New York, 1966).
[Ed.] See Edmund Wilson, ‘The Ambiguity of Henry James’, in The Triple Thinkers (Harmondsworth, 1962).
[Ed.] Page references are to Henry James, The Turn of the Screw, ed. Robert Kimbrough (New York, 1966).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1997 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newton, K.M. (1997). Shoshana Felman: ‘The Madness of Interpretation: Literature and Psychoanalysis’. In: Newton, K.M. (eds) Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25934-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25934-2_31
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-67742-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25934-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)