Shakespeare and the Definition of the Irish Nation

  • Richard English

Abstract

The absorption of influential Revolutionary Irish Republicans in Shakespeare and in Shakespearean criticism provides a valuable setting for the reconsideration of key aspects of modern Irish politics.1 Notable early twentieth-century Republicans as varied as Peadar O’Donnell, Ernie O’Malley, Sean O’Faoláin and Frank Ryan exemplify this trend, neatly captured in memorable prison statements from O’Malley in the early 1920s such as: ‘I have a decent library now and have ample time to browse deep in Chaucer, Shakespeare, Dante, and Milton’, or ‘I like Shakespeare best’.2 These Irish Republicans exhibited an enthusiastic attachment to British literary culture. O’Malley’s IRA [Irish Republican Army] colleague, Peadar O’Donnell, wrote of his own prison excitement over Defoe, Shelley, Dickens, Stevenson, Wodehouse, and (with characteristic impishness) of his passion for Shakespeare:

I don’t remember on what day of the week I finally escaped from prison but it was on a Wednesday that I saw a copy of Shakespeare in the officers’ lavatory when I was outside having a bath; I stole it! Well, listen here, there’s no punishment I could ever receive for that theft that would exceed the joy its capture gave me. I’m telling you, Shakespeare was a great man, and I would suggest to the British ruling class that the least they can do when they jail folk like me is to present each of us with a copy of his works. It is true that in this case I rescued Shakespeare from a few of my countrymen but that must not be used as an argument to resist my plea, for it is only that section of my countrymen who can be hired to serve the Empire who would use Shakespeare in a lavatory.3

Keywords

Manifold Europe Income Posit Malaysia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Ernie O’Malley to Sheila Humphreys, 12 Apr. 1923, Humphreys Papers, Archives Dept., University College, Dublin, P106/754; Ernie O’Malley to Molly Childers, 26 Nov.–1 Dec. 1923, in Richard English and Cormac O’Malley (eds), Prisoners: The Civil War Letters of Ernie O’Malley (Dublin: Poolbeg, 1991), p. 89. O’Malley was also a student of the Shakespearean scholarship of Andrew Cecil Bradley.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Peadar O’Donnell, The Gates Flew Open (London: Jonathan Cape, 1932), p. 150.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Richard English, ‘“The Inborn Hate of Things English”: Ernie O’Malley and the Irish Revolution 1916–1923’, Past and Present, 151, May (1996), pp. 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    James Shapiro, Shakespeare and the Jews (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 42.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Mark Thornton Burnett, ‘Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage’, Shakespeare Survey, 49 (1996), p. 305.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    See Peter Hart, ‘The Protestant Experience of Revolution in Southern Ireland’, in Richard English and Graham Walker (eds), Unionism in Modern Ireland: New Perspectives on Politics and Culture (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    For a discussion of frequently fierce debates on national identity, see Bhikhu Parekh, ‘Discourses on National Identity’, Political Studies, 42, September (1994), pp. 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 11.
    See Rose’s excellent treatment of this theme in Paul Lawrence Rose, Wagner: Race and Revolution (London: Faber and Faber, 1992).Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Roy Foster, Modern Ireland 1600–1972 (London: Allen Lane, 1988), p. 316.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Jim Smyth, The Men of No Property: Irish Radicals and Popular Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1992), p. 182.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Nancy Curtin, The United Irishmen: Popular Politics in Ulster and Dublin 1791–1798 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 9, 10, 288–9.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Marianne Elliott, Wolfe Tone: Prophet of Irish Independence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), pp. 1, 111, 129, 364. There is an intriguing Shakespearean echo here which, perhaps, reinforces some of the points made in this essay concerning Shakespearean connections with Irish Republicanism. For the ‘special Providence’ quotation recalls Shakespeare’s ‘special providence in the fall of a sparrow’ (Hamlet, ed. Harold Jenkins [London and New York: Methuen, 1987], V. ii. 215–16). I am grateful to Dr Mark Thornton Burnett for this reference.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Thomas Davis, ‘Ancient Ireland’, in Thomas Davis, Literary and Historical Essays (Dublin: James Duffy, 1854), pp. 41–2.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    George Boyce, Nationalism in Ireland (London and New York: Routledge, 1991), p. 158.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Richard Davis, The Young Ireland Movement (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1987), p. 264.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Maryann Valiulis, Portrait of a Revolutionary: General Richard Mulcahy and the Founding of the Irish Free State (Blackrock: Irish Academic Press, 1992), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Paul Bew, Ideology and the Irish Question: Ulster Unionism and Irish Nationalism1912–1916 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Cormac Ó Gráda, Ireland: A New Economic History 1780–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 242, 250, 307.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    David Lloyd, Anomalous States: Irish Writing and the Post-colonial Moment (Dublin: Lilliput, 1993), p. 18.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Liam Kennedy, ‘Modern Ireland: Post-colonial Society or Post-colonial Pretensions’, Irish Review, 13 (1992–1993), pp. 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 28.
    Emer Nolan, James Joyce and Nationalism (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), p. 45.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    David Cannadine, ‘The Empire Strikes Back’, Past and Present, 147, May (1995), p. 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 30.
    Donald Akenson, The Irish Diaspora: A Primer (Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, 1993), pp. 144, 146.Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (London: Vintage, 1994), pp. xi–xii, 8.Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    Simple binary formulations similarly fail to convince in non-Irish cases. As Gyan Prakash has recently observed, even anti-colonial nationalists have tended to move beyond the simple polarities of ‘colonizer’ and ‘colonized’ (Gyan Prakash [ed.], After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Post-Colonial Displacements [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995], p. 9).Google Scholar
  26. 35.
    It is worth considering the thoughtful study by Michael Gallagher of the relevance or otherwise of the notion of self-determination when dealing with Irish politics. He observes that Irish nationalists have argued that the application of the self-determination principle points to the legitimacy of a united Ireland, but concludes that the principle is, in fact, of limited value in Ireland since the intermingling of unionists and nationalists renders it impossible for the ‘self’ to ‘determine’ its own destiny without trampling on someone else’s as a consequence (Michael Gallagher, ‘Do Ulster Unionists have a Right to Self-determination?’, Irish Political Studies, 5 [1990], pp. 11–30).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 36.
    Lloyd, Anomalous States, p. 81; cf. Richard English, Radicals and the Republic: Socialist Republicanism in the Irish Free State 1925–1937 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  28. 38.
    Roy Foster, Paddy and Mr Punch: Connections in Irish and English History (London: Allen Lane, 1993), p. xi.Google Scholar
  29. 39.
    George Boyce, ‘Brahmins and Carnivores: The Irish Historian in Great Britain’, Irish Historical Studies, 25, May (1987), p. 227.Google Scholar
  30. 40.
    George Boyce, The Irish Question and British Politics1868–1986 (London: Macmillan, 1988), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  31. 41.
    Graham Walker, Intimate Strangers: Political and Cultural Interaction Between Scotland and Ulster in Modern Times (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1995), p. v.Google Scholar
  32. 42.
    See, for one example among many, Arthur Kinney, ‘Shakespeare’s Macbeth and the Question of Nationalism’, in Vincent Newey and Ann Thompson (eds), Literature and Nationalism (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1991), pp. 56–75, which looks at resonances between Shakespeare and early seventeenth-century political developments.Google Scholar
  33. 43.
    Salman Rushdie, ‘In Good Faith’, in Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981–1991 (London: Granta, 1992), p. 394.Google Scholar
  34. 44.
    Salman Rushdie, The Moor’s Last Sigh (London: Jonathan Cape, 1995), p. 87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard English

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations