Abstract
Genes exist. But how do we know? Because there is a technology that has told us. Scientific techniques led us to genes, and they determine the way we talk about them. Technology seems to drive our ethical and thus our political thinking about them. For example, chorionic vus sampling (CVS) is a single technique which can be used to locate two relatively common conditions: cystic fibrosis (CF) and Down’s syndrome (DS). What, apart from the technique itself, do they have in common? Cystic fibrosis interferes with the vital operations of breathing and digesting; it causes what we perceive as physical suffering. These are the grounds on which the justifiability of a termination of pregnancy is open for discussion. Down’s syndrome, on the other hand (usually caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21, i.e. trisomy-21), involves the empirical observation that nobody with an extra chromosome 21 in every cell has yet — at least as far as we know — been capable of passing an ‘A’ level examination. Is this suffering? (The minority of cases where there are added physical complications is a separate matter.) Clearly, there has to be a completely different discussion about the justifiability of terminations of pregnancy in this case, but the differences between CF and DS are smothered by the fact that we associate them with a single technique that identifies both conditions.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The relevant passages are in the first volume of Wittgenstein’s Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology (Blackwell: Oxford, 1980).
See my ‘The psychopolitics of learning and disability in the seventeenth century’, in Anne Digby and David Wright (eds), Historical Perspectives on People with Learning Disabilities (Routledge: London, 1995).
Michael Burleigh’s book Death and Deliverance: ‘Euthanasia’ in Germany 1900–1945 (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1994) gives a detailed account of what happened to people with various disabilities during and preceding the war.
There are certainly scientists around who are prepared to trade in these iatrogenic anxieties. See, for example, J. Maddox, ‘The case for the human genome’, in Nature 352 (1991). This example was pointed out to me by Audrey Tyler.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodey, C. (1997). Learning Difficulties and the Guardians of the Gene. In: Clarke, A., Parsons, E. (eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25882-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25882-6_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25884-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25882-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)