Abstract
In Chapter 2 it was suggested that a policy framework is needed for the effective implementation of environmental policies and programmes. A suggested framework included the following: policy instruments; environmental protection legislation; the setting of national environmental standards pertaining to water, air, effluent discharge, noise, waste disposal, pesticide residues and odours; laboratory facilities to test quality assurance and control of industrial emissions, effluent and other polluting substances; and an administrative system to enforce environmental laws and regulations and secure compliance by industry and the relevant government agencies through prosecution and court action. Also discussed, though briefly, was the need for trained administrators who are fully sensitive to environmental issues, and the importance of maintaining an administrative vision when faced with environmental crisis. But the experience with implementing any framework has been that things do not proceed in a textbook manner; there are always institutional and administrative factors that either thwart the implementation process or obstruct the management strategy. What are these factors? Are they inherent institutional and administrative weaknesses? Can they be surmounted? This chapter examines various institutional and administrative weaknesses that may creep into a system, recommends mechanisms to handle such problems, and discusses the need for accountable environmental management. The chapter concludes with a plea for a parliamentary commissioner for the environment. Although the discussion in this chapter is general and drawn from the experiences of industrialised countries, the same problems are faced by India and other developing nations; in this regard the author agrees with Peter Blunt that ‘just as organisational malfunctioning knows no national boundaries so too do certain strategies for improving organisational effectiveness.’1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Peter Blunt, ‘Strategies for Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness in the Third World’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 10, no. 3 (1990), pp. 310–11.
On government responsibility and accountability, see Joseph G. Jabbra and O. P. Dwivedi (eds), Public Service Accountability: A Comparative Perspective (West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press, 1989), pp. 1–10.
This and the following two sections are drawn from O. P. Dwivedi, Development Administration: From Underdevelopment to Sustainable Development (London: Macmillan, 1994), pp. 124–7.
Francois Bregha and Philippe Clement, ‘A Renewed Framework for Government Accountability in the Area of Sustainable Development: Potential Role for a Canadian Parliamentary Auditor/Commissioner for the Environment’, Working paper, Ottawa: NRTEE, January 1994, p. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 O. P. Dwivedi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dwivedi, O.P. (1997). Improving Organisational Effectiveness and Accountability for Environmental Protection. In: India’s Environmental Policies, Programmes and Stewardship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25859-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25859-8_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25861-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25859-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)