Abstract
Humanity’s ability to manipulate its surroundings is enormous and ranges from the obvious — such as damming rivers — to the subtle — for example the effects of DDT on the reproduction of wildlife. The modern concern about the environment started in the late 1960s, when proposals were made for a ‘right’ to environmental quality. The proposals of the early environmentalists mostly involved tools such as environmental impact assessments, the imposition of duties and regulations on private industries and corporations, and state powers to monitor potentially polluting activities in both the public and private sectors. However the assessment of environmental damage does not stop at measuring pesticide residues and the amount of mercury in fish. It involves the quality of all life on earth, and indeed the ability of human beings to interact with nature and survive in the long run. It also means that pollution, the destruction of species and natural areas, and the depletion of resources can not be placed second to people’s materialism and their desire for technological progress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 310.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Why Conservation? (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, Commission on Ecology, 1985), p. 3.
UN Conference on the Human Environment, Declaration on the Human Environment (New York: UNO, December 1972).
For an elaboration of the present author’s views on environmental ethics, see O. P. Dwivedi, ‘Man and Nature: A Holistic Approach to a Theory of Ecology’, The Environmental Professional, vol. 10, no. 1 (1988), pp. 8–15
For an overall review of developmental efforts between the 1940s and 1980s, see O. P. Dwivedi, Development Administration: From Underdevelopment to Sustainable Development, (London: Macmillan, 1994).
For further details see O. P. Dwivedi and J. Nef, ‘Crises and Continuities in Development Theory and Administration: First and Third World Perspectives’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 2 (1982), pp. 59–68.
See O. P. Dwivedi, ‘Development administration: its heritage, culture and challenges’, Canadian Public Administration, vol. 33, no. 1 (Spring 1991), pp. 91–98.
The World Bank, Economic Development with Environmental Management Strategies for Mauritius, report no. 7264-MAS (Washington, DC: World Bank, November 1988), p. 2.
This section is drawn from O. P. Dwivedi, J. Nef and J. Vanderkop, ‘Science, Technology and Underdevelopment: A Contextual Approach’, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, vol. 11, no. 2 (1990), pp. 231–22.
Nora Cebotarev, The Diffusion of Technology: Blessing or Curse for Latin American Nations?’, in J. Nef (ed.), Canada and the Latin American Challenge (Guelph: University of Guelph, 1978), pp. 97–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 O. P. Dwivedi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dwivedi, O.P. (1997). Issues in Environmental Protection: A Third World Perspective. In: India’s Environmental Policies, Programmes and Stewardship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25859-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25859-8_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25861-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25859-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)