Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual Preference as the Basis of Social Choice

  • Chapter
Book cover Social Choice Re-examined

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Social choice theory is an analytical discipline which makes extensive use of axiomatic methods. Many of its strengths and weaknesses relate precisely to this analytical character, including the strength arising from its interpretational versatility and the weakness of a tendency towards formal neglect of substantive issues. The subject of this essay is this mixed pattern of virtues and vices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arneson, R. (1989) ‘Equality and Equality of Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 56, pp. 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd extended edn. (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1973) ‘Some Ordinalist Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’ Theory of Justice’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, pp. 245–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1977) ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 67, pp. 219–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1983) Social Justice and Public Policy (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, and Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K., Pattanaik, P. K., and Suzumura, K., (eds) (1995) Choice, Welfare and Development (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1994) Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract, vol. I (London: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. (1977) ‘Utility versus Equity: Some Plausible Quasi-orderings’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 7, pp. 365–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D. and Weymark, J. (1984) ‘Social Choice with Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: A Diagrammatic Introduction’, International Economic Review, vol. 25, pp. 325–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. H. (1988) ‘The Primary-Goods Indexation Problem in Rawls’ Theory of Justice’, Theory and Decision, vol. 24, pp. 239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borda, J.-C. de (1781) ‘Mémoire sur les Elections au Scrutin’, Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, pp. 657–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • English translation de Grazia, A. (1953) Isis, vol. 44, pp. 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, F. (1977) ‘The Liberal Paradox, Decisiveness Over Issues, and Domain Restrictions’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, vol. 37, pp. 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (1991) Weighing Goods (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954a) ‘Social Choice, Democracy and Free Markets’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 62, pp. 114–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954b) ‘Individual Choice in Voting and the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 62, pp. 334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1986) Liberty, Market and the State (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1982) ‘Social Aggregation Rules and Continuity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 97, pp. 337–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. and Heal, G. M. (1983) ‘Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Resolution of Social Choice Paradox’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 31, pp. 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1989) ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics, vol. 99, pp. 906–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1990) ‘Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods and Capabilities’, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, vol. 56, pp. 357–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1993) ‘Equality of What? On Welfare, Resources and Capabilities’, in Nussbaum and Sen (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1986) Individual Interests and Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, Marquis de (Caritat, J. A. N.) (1785) Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Asprémont, C. (1985) ‘Axioms for Social Welfare Ordering’, in Hurwicz et al. (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Asprémont, C. and Gevers, L. (1977) ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, pp. 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, R. (1989) ‘Rights as Alternative Game Forms: Is There a Difference in Consequences?’, mimeo, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, R. (1994) ‘Waiver, Effectivity and Rights as Game Forms’, Economica, vol. 61, pp. 167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, R., Pattanaik, P. K. and Razzolini, L. (1994) ‘Game Forms, Rights and the Efficiency of Social Outcomes’, mimeo, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1981) ‘What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’ and ‘What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 10, pp. 185–246 and 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1985) A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and Hylland, A. (eds) (1986) Foundations of Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and Roemer, J. (eds) (1991) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1973) The Theory of Social Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, W., Pattanaik, P. and Suzumura, K. (1992) ‘Individual Rights Revisited’, Economica, vol. 59, pp. 161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (1981) ‘Rights, Games and Social Choice’, Noûs, vol. 15, pp. 341–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, L. (1979) ‘On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings’, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1974) ‘A Pareto-consistent Libertarian Claim’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 7, pp. 388–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1979) ‘Disparate Goods and Rawls’s Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment’, Theory and Decision, vol. 11, pp. 267–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1986) ‘Laundering Preferences’, in Elster and Hylland (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J. C. B. (1969) Pleasure and Desire (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, H. W. and Leinfellner, W. (eds) (1978) Decision Theory and Social Ethics (Dordrecht: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1986) Well-being (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1994) ‘Three Models of Democracy’, Constellations, vol. 1, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1976) ‘Equity, Arrow’s Conditions and Rawls’ Difference Principle’, Econometrica, vol. 44, pp. 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1981) ‘Liberalism, Independent Rights and the Pareto Principle’, in Cohen, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1982) ‘Utilitarianism, Uncertainty and Information’, in Sen and Williams (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1985) ‘Welfare Economics’, in Feiwel, G. (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1963) Freedom and Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 63, pp. 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1939) Value and Capital (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds) (1985) Social Goals and Social Organisation: Essays in Memory of Elisha Pazner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. S. (1978) Arrow Impossibility Theorems (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. S. (1978) ‘A Theorem on Utilitarianism’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 45, pp. 93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. S. (1979) ‘Decision-making under Ignorance with Implications for Social Choice’, Theory and Decision, vol. 11, pp. 319–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. S. (1994) ‘Majority Rule, Social Welfare Functions, and Game Forms’, mimeo, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. (1976) The Just Economy (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1859) On Liberty (London); republished 1974 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1973) ‘Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 3, pp. 45–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1989) The Examined Life (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds) (1993) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K. (1971) Voting and Collective Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K. (1996) ‘On Modelling Individual Rights: Some Conceptual Issues’, in Arrow, K J. et al. (eds), Social Choice Re-examined, vol. 2 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K. and Salles, M. A. (eds) (1983) Social Choice and Welfare (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K. and Suzumura, K. (1994) ‘Individual Rights and Social Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework’, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. S. (ed.) (1973) Economic Justice (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1952) The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn with eight new appendices (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R. (1976) ‘Axiomatic Social Choice Theory: An Overview and Interpretation’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 20, pp. 511–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R. (1978) ‘Rawls’ Theory of Justice: An Impossibility Result’, in Gottinger and Leinfellner (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1931) Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (London: Paul, Trench, Trubner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1982) ‘Social Unity and Primary Goods’, in Sen and Williams (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (1987) Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill’s Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (1989) ‘Rights to Liberty in Purely Private Matters: Part I’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 5, pp. 121–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (1990) ‘Rights to Liberty in Purely Private Matters: Part II’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 6, pp. 27–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. W. S. (1980a) ‘Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 47, pp. 409–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. W. S. (1980b) ‘Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 47, pp. 421–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E. (1992) ‘Commerce and the State: Turgot, Condorcet and Smith’, Economic Journal, vol. 102, pp. 1197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1975) ‘Preference and Urgency’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72, pp. 655–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanion, T. M. (1991) ‘The Moral Basis of Interpersonal Comparisons’, in Elster and Roemer (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, C. (1975) ‘On Liberal Values’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, vol. 35, pp. 257–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden-Day); republished 1979 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1973) ‘Behaviour and the Concept of Preference’, Economica, vol. 40, pp. 241–59; reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1976) ‘Liberty, Unanimity and Rights’, Economica, vol. 43, pp. 217–45; reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977a) ‘Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination’, Econometrica, vol. 45, pp. 53–89; reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977b) ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, Econometrica, vol. 45, pp. 1539–72; reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977c) ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 6, pp. 317–44; reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1980) ‘Equality of What?’, in McMurrin, S. M. (1980) Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); reprinted in Sen (1982a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1982a) Choice, Welfare and Measurement (Oxford: Blackwell, and Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1982b) ‘Rights and Agency’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 11, pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1983) ‘Liberty and Social Choice’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 80, pp. 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985a) ‘Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, pp. 169–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985b) Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1991a) ‘Welfare, Preference and Freedom’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 50, pp. 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1991b) ‘On Indexing Primary Goods and Capabilities’, mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1992) ‘Minimal Liberty’, Economica, vol. 57, pp. 139–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993a) ‘Well-being and Capability’, in Nussbaum and Sen (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993b) ‘Markets and Freedoms’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 45, pp. 519–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993c) ‘Positional Objectivity’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 22, pp. 83–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. and Williams, B. (eds) (1982) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasnick, S. (1976) ‘Social Choice Theory and the Derivation of Rawls’ Difference Principle’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 73, pp. 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1981) The Political Economy of Public Choice (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1985) ‘Liberty, Preference and Choice’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 1, pp. 213–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1993) ‘Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 31, pp. 1947–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1978) ‘On the Consistency of Libertarian Claims’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 45, pp. 329–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1982) ‘Equity, Efficiency and Rights in Social Choice’, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 131–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1983) Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weymark, J. (1991) ‘A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen Debate on Utilitarianism’, in Elster and Roemer (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wriglesworth, J. (1985) Libertarian Conflicts in Social Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard University, USA

    Amartya Sen

Authors
  1. Amartya Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Stanford University, California, USA

    Kenneth J. Arrow

  2. Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Amartya Sen

  3. Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan

    Kotaro Suzumura

Copyright information

© 1997 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, A. (1997). Individual Preference as the Basis of Social Choice. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A., Suzumura, K. (eds) Social Choice Re-examined. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25849-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation