Skip to main content

Academicians and the Academy of Sciences on the Eve of the Revolution: Growing Social Awareness

  • Chapter
Russian Academicians and the Revolution

Part of the book series: Studies in Russian and East European History and Society ((SREEHS))

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

By the beginning of the twentieth century, the Imperial Academy of Sciences, established by Peter the Great in St Petersburg in 1725 under the name of the St Petersburg Academy, had already undergone a considerable number of reforms that gradually turned this scientific body, dominated by foreign scientists for well over a century, into a Russian institution. It was already since the 1840s that in response to the demands of changing society the academy began to overcome its isolation.1 By the beginning of the twentieth century, a core of liberal members of the academy joined other Russian intellectuals in criticizing autocracy and demanding the introduction of elements of representative government in the country. It is these people and their continuing activities under the Bolsheviks that constitute the main focus of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Alexander Vucinich, Empire of Knowledge. The Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1917–1970) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Loren Graham, ‘The Development of Science Policy in the Soviet Union,’ in T. Dixon Long and Christopher Wright (eds), Science Policies of Industrial Nations. Case Studies of the United States, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, Japan, and Sweden (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1975), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Some studies of the academy erroneously cite the number of academicians in October 1917 as 41. See, for instance, Vucinich, Empire of Knowledge, p. 115. This figure is given in G.D. Komkov et al., Akademiya nauk SSSR: Kratkii istorichesky ocherk (Moscow: Nauka, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted by Rt. Hon. H.A.L. Fisher in his memoirs about Vinogradov in The Collected Papers of Paul Vinogradoff (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quoted in Alexander Vucinich, Science in Russian Culture, 1861–1917 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terence Emmons, The Formation of Political Parties and the First National Elections in Russia (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983) p. 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. V.N. Ipatieff, The Life of a Chemist (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1946), pp. 133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A description of prerevolutionary Russian engineers as a social group is given in Kendall E. Bailes, Technology and Society under Lenin and Stalin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978) pp. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ipatieff, The Life of a Chemist, p. 141. A similar statement was made by Sergei Platonov, who was elected a corresponding member of the academy in 1909 and became a full member in 1920. See V.P. Leonov et al. (eds), Akademicheskoe delo 1929–1931 gg (St Petersburg: Biblioteka Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 1993) pp. 29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richard Pipes, Struve. Liberal on the Right, 1905–1944 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980) pp. 218–219.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For Vernadsky’s position on political extremism, see the chapter on Vernadsky below. On the Kadets’ attitude toward extremism, see Anna Geifman, Thou Shalt Kill:Revolutionary Terrorism in Russia 1894–1917 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993) pp. 207–22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William McGucken, Scientists, Society, and State (Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1984) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.D. Komkov et al. (eds), Istoriya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol. I (Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka, 1964) p. 460.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.D. Komkov et al., Akademiya nauk SSSR: Kratkii istorichesky ocherk (Moscow: Nauka, 1967), p. 277

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert K. Merton and Jerry Gaston (eds), The Sociology of Science in Europe (London and Amsterdam: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977) p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See the chapter on Ol’denburg, footnote 38. V.I. Vernadsky, Ocherki i rechi, vol. 1, Moscow, 1922, pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alexei Kojevnikov, ‘Transformations and Survivals,’ Science, vol. 261, 3 September 1993, p. 1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. See, for instance, Loren R. Graham, The Soviet Academy of Sciences and the Communist Party, 1927–1932 (Princeton, NJ: Priceton University Press, 1967) p. 21

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Commisariat of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuel D. Kassow, Students, Professors, and the State in Tsarist Russia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), pp. 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  21. James C. McClelland, Autoctrats and Academics: Education, Culture, and Society in Tsarist Russia (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheila Fitzpatrick’s statement in The Commissariat of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970) p. 73

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walter P. Metzger, ‘Academic Freedom and Scientific Freedom,’ Daedalus, Spring 1978, pp. 94–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. This information was provided by academician D.S. Likhachev. See also the characteristics of Nikol’sky given by S.F. Platonov during his interrogation by the OGPU in January 1930, V.P. Leonov et al. (eds), Akademicheskoe delo 1929–1931 gg, vol. 1 (St Petersburg: Biblioteka Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 1993) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jack Morrell and Arnold Thackray, Gentlemen of Science:Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.L. Frank, ‘Etika nigilizma’ in Vekhi: Intelligentsia v Rossii (Sbornik statei 1909–1910) (Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 1991) p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  27. see Marc Raeff’s forward to Marshall S. Shatz and Judith E. Zimmerman (trans), Vekhi — Landmarsk: a Collection about the Russian Intelligentsia (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P.G. Vinogradov, ‘Politicheskie pis’ma,’ Russkie vedomosti, 5 August, 1905. See also Georgii Fedotov’s essay of 1925, ‘Tragediya russkoi intelligentsii’, published in E.M. Chekharin (ed.), O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture (Moscow: Nauka, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Vera Tolz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tolz, V. (1997). Academicians and the Academy of Sciences on the Eve of the Revolution: Growing Social Awareness. In: Russian Academicians and the Revolution. Studies in Russian and East European History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25840-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25840-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25842-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25840-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics