Towards a Workable Heritage Policy
Economic analysis can be used in a number of ways to elucidate what happens when a heritage policy is in place. It can produce a social accounting framework, it can explore the utility functions of those who execute policies, it can examine the effects of alternative pricing policies and what the effect will be of tax, subsidy and regulatory arrangements designed to implement policy. No doubt these professional activities can be utilized by policy-makers if they so wish.
KeywordsDust Expense Poss Alan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- B. Frey, ‘Direct Democracy: Politico-Economic Lessons from Swiss Experience’, American Economic Review, Volume 84, No. 2 (1994a), pp. 339–42.Google Scholar
- B. Frey, ‘Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Volume 41, No. 3 (1994b), pp. 325–35.Google Scholar
- E. Gombrich, ‘Art History and the Social Sciences’, in E. Gombrich, Ideals and Idols: Essays on Values in History and in Art, London: Phaidon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- M. Hutter, ‘Kunst als Quelle wirtschaftlichen Wachstums’, Zeitschrift für Aesthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 3 (1986), pp. 231–45.Google Scholar
- S.W. Jevons, ‘The Use and Abuse of Museums’, in: S.W. Jevons, Methods of Social Reform and Other Papers, London: Macmillan, 1883, pp. 53–81.Google Scholar
- A. Peacock, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Political Control of Public Investment’, in J. N. Wolfe (ed.), Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1973.Google Scholar
- A. Peacock, ‘A Future for the Past: The Political Economy of Heritage’ (1994 Keynes Lecture in Economics), Proceedings of the British Academy, 87 (1995), pp. 187–243.Google Scholar
- J. Ruskin, ‘The Seven Lamps of Architecture’, Chapter VI of Works of John Ruskin (edited by E. T. Cook and A. Wedderburn), London: George Allen and Unwin, 1903.Google Scholar