It is written that he who lives according to Heaven’s will is in the right way; he who departs from Heaven’s will is wrong …


Nineteenth Century Eighteenth Century Mekong Delta Late Eighteenth Century Chinese Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Phan Thanh Giau’s suicide testament, as translated in Truong Buu Lam, Patterns of Vietnamese Response to Foreign Intervention: 1858–1900 (New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1967), pp. 67–8.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    This suicidal mass attack (puputan) was repeated later in Klungkung, and had been preceded in the Balinese state of Lombok in 1894. These events are discussed by, among others, Miguel Covarrubias, Island of Bali (1937, reprinted Kuala Lumpur: OUP, 1972), pp. 30–7;Google Scholar
  3. Adrian Vickers, Bali: A Paradise Created (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989), pp. 34–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I am indebted for much of this section to Professor Morris-Suzuki, and in particular two of her papers: ‘Re-writing history: Civilization theory in contemporary Japan’, in Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, Vol. I, No. 2 (1993), pp. 526–49, and ‘Edo boom’, published in Japanese as ‘Edo to iu utopia’ [Edo as a utopia], Sekai, January 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayami Akira, ‘Introduction’, in Economic Development in Rice Producing Societies. Some Aspects of East Asian Economic History 1500–1900, eds. Akira Hayami and Yoshihiro Tsubouchi (Tokyo: 1989);Google Scholar
  6. Thomas Smith, Native Sources of Japanese Industrialization 1750–1920 (Berkeley: UC Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Authors referred to by Morris-Suzuki include Bitô Masahide, Edo jidai to wa nani ka [What is the Edo age] (1992);Google Scholar
  8. Kawakatsu Heita, Nihon bunmei to kindai Seiyô [Japanese Civilization and the Modern West] (1991);Google Scholar
  9. and Tsuji Tatsuya, Edo jidai o kangaeru [Thinking about the Edo era] (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Michael Adas, Machines as the Measure of Men. Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989).Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    G.M. Mantegazza, La Birmania (Rome: Ed. A.S., 1784; reprinted 1950), p. 103.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680, 2 vols (New Haven, Conn.: Yale UP, 1988–93) — particularly Vol. II, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    Thomas Stamford Raffles, The History of Java (1817; reprinted Kuala Lumpur: OUP, 1965), Vol. II, p. 6.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Henri Mouhot, Travels in the Central Parts of Indo-China (Siam), Cambodia, and Laos, during the years 1858, 1859, and 1860, 2 vols (1864; reprinted Bangkok: White Lotus, 1986), pp. 278–9.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    G. Coedes, ‘Etudes indochinoises’, in BSEI (ns), Vol. 26 (1951), pp. 437–62f.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    A. Schreiner, Les Institutions annamites en Basse-Cochinchine avant la conquête française (Saigon: Claude, 1900–2), Vol. I, pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
  17. See in the same vein J. Silvestre, L’Empire d’Annam et le peuple annamite (Paris: Alcan, 1889);Google Scholar
  18. E. Luro, Le Pays d’Annam: Etude sur l’organisation politique et sociale des annamites (Paris: 1878; 2nd edn, Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1897).Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    D.G.E. Hall, A History of Southeast Asia (London: Macmillan, 1955), pp. 378, 647.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Tran Van Giau, Su Khung hoang cua che do phong kien nha Nguyen truoc 1858 [The crisis of the Vietnamese feudal system before 1858] (Hanoi: NXB Van Hoa, 1958), p. 33;Google Scholar
  21. Phan Huy Le et al., Lich Su Che Do Phong Kien Viet-Nam [History of the Vietnamese Feudal System], 3 vols (Hanoi: NXB Giao duc, 1961), Vol. III, p. 430.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Phan, Lich Su, Vol. III, p. 446. For the more measured but still negative judgement of the leading non-communist Vietnamese historian see Le Thanh Khoi, Histoire du Vietnam des origines à 1858 (Paris: Sudestasie, 1981), p. 345.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Kang Man-gil, ‘How history is viewed in the North and in the South: Convergence and divergence’, Korea Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2(1990), p. 9.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Cho Ki-jun, Han’guk chabonjuui songnip saron [Discourses on the formative history of Korean capitalism] (Seoul: 1973);Google Scholar
  25. Lee Ki-baik, A New History of Korea, revised edition, trans. Edward Wagner (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1984), pp. 226–63.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    David Wyatt, ‘The “subtle revolution” of King Rama I of Siam’, in Moral Order and the Question of Change: Essays on Southeast Asian Thought, eds David Wyatt and Alexander Woodside (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1982), p. 17.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Nidhi Aeusrivongse, Prawatsat Rattanakosin nai phraratchaphongsawadan Ayutthaya [Bangkok History in Ayudhya Chronicles] (Bangkok: Bannakit, 1978), and Pak Kai Lae Bai Rua: Ruam Khwam Riang Wa Duai Wannakam Lae Prawatisat Ton Ratanakosin [Pen and sail: Collected essays on early Bangkok literature and history] (Bangkok: Amarin, 1984). The first chapter of the latter work has been summarized in English by the author as The early Bangkok period: Literary change and its social causes’, ASR, Vol. 18, No. 1 (July 1994), pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Alexander Woodside, Vietnam and the Chinese Model. A Comparative Study of Nguyen and Ch’ing Civil Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1971).Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Nguyen Duc Nghinh, ‘Tinh hinh phan phoi ruong dat o xa Mac Xa giua hai thoi diem (1789–1805)’, Nghien Cuu Lich Su Vol. 161 (1974); translated as ‘La préponderance des propriétaires moyens à Mac Xa entre 1789 et 1805’, in Propriété privée et propriété collective dans l’ancien Vietnam, trans. G. Boudarel, Lydie Prin and Vu Can (Paris: Harmattan, 1987), pp. 111–208, and ‘Land distribution in Tu Liem district according to the land registers’, Vietnamese Studies (Hanoi), Vol. 61 (1980), pp. 164–87. Nguyen Dinh Dau, ‘Remarques préliminaires sur les registres cadastraux (dia ba) des six provinces de la Cochinchine (Nam Ky Luc Tinh)’, BEFEO, Vol. 78 (1991). Sakurai Yumio, Betonamu Sonraku no Keisei [Formation of the Vietnamese village] (Tokyo: Sobunsha, 1987). Available in English is Sakurai’s ‘A Study of landownership in some early nineteenth century Vietnamese villages’, Southeast Asia, History and Culture, Vol. 6 (1976).Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Published as Chung van de van hoa xa hoi Thoi Nguyen [Cultural and social issues of the Nguyen period], ed. Mac Duong (Ho Chi Minh City: Nha Xuat Ban Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1992).Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Warren, James Warren, The Sulu Zone 1768–1898 (Singapore: Singapore UP, 1981);Google Scholar
  32. Shaharil Talib, ‘The port and polity of Terengganu during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, in The Southeast Asian Port and Polity: Rise and Demise, ed. J. Kathirithamby-Wells and J. Villiers (Singapore: Singapore UP, 1990), pp. 213–30.Google Scholar
  33. Carl Trocki, Prince of Pirates: the Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore, 1784–1885 (Singapore: OUP, 1979).Google Scholar
  34. 31.
    Lee Kam Hing, The Sultanate of Aceh. Relations with the British 1760–1824 (Kuala Lumpur: OUP, 1995).Google Scholar
  35. 32.
    M.C. Ricklefs, Jogjakarta under Sultan Mangkubumi 1749–1792 (London: OUP, 1974).Google Scholar
  36. Peter Carey, ‘Waiting for the “just king”: The Agrarian world of South-Central Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War (1825–30)’, MAS, Vol. 20, No. 1 (1986), pp. 59–138.Google Scholar
  37. Ann Kumar, ‘Javanese court society and politics in the late eighteenth century: The record of a lady soldier’, Indonesia, Vol. 29 (1980), pp. 1–46 and Vol. 30, pp. 67–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 33.
    See especially Victor Lieberman, ‘Secular trends in Burmese economic history, c. 1350–1830, and their implications for state formation’, MAS, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1991), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 34.
    A persuasive argument linking this process to the Tay Son rebellion has been made in Li Tana, ‘“The inner region”: A social and economic history of Nguyen Vietnam in the seventeenth and eighteenth century’, PhD dissertation, ANU, 1992, pp. 162–170.Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    K.N. Chaudhuri, Asia Before Europe. Economy and Civilisation of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990), p. 387.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Peter Carey, ‘Changing Javanese perceptions of the Chinese communities in central Java’, Indonesia (1984), p. 37. Edgar Wickberg, The Chinese in Philippine Life 1850–1898 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale UP, 1965), pp. 20–35.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    Ng Chin Keong, ‘The case of Ch’en I-lao: Maritime trade and overseas Chinese in Ch’ing policies, 1717–1754’, in Emporia, Commodities and Entrepreneurs in Asian Maritime Trade, c.1400–1750, eds Roderich Ptak and Dietmar Rothermund (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1991), pp. 373–400.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    T.J. Newbold, British Settlements in the Straits of Malacca (1839; reprinted Kuala Lumpur: OUP), Vol. I, p. 9.Google Scholar
  44. 39.
    Sojourners and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese in Honour of Jennifer Cushman, ed. Anthony Reid (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1995), pp. xxii–xxiii. And see Trocki in this volume.Google Scholar
  45. 40.
    John K. Fairbank (ed.), The Chinese World Order. Traditional China’s Foreign Relations (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1968), pp. 11, 99–101, 265–6. Anthony Reid, ‘Flows and seepages in the long-term Chinese interaction with Southeast Asia’, in Sojourners and Settlers, pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
  46. Suebsang Promboon, ‘Sino-Siamese tributary relations 1282–1835’, PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, 1971, pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
  47. 43.
    A.C. Milner, The Invention of Politics in Colonial Malaya (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994), pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
  48. 44.
    Barbara Andaya in this volume. Also Barbara Andaya and Virginia Matheson, ‘Islamic thought and Malay tradition: The writing of Raja Ali Haji of Riau (c.1809-c.1870)’, in Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia, eds Anthony Reid and David Marr (Singapore: Heinemann, 1979), pp. 108–28.Google Scholar
  49. G.W.J. Drewes, Directions for Travellers on the Mystic Path (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 45.
    In addition to Ann Kumar’s chapter below, see her ‘Javanese court society and politics in the late eighteenth century: The record of a lady soldier’, Indonesia, Vol. 29 (1980), pp. 1–46 and 30, pp. 67–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 46.
    Clifford Geertz, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP: 1980);Google Scholar
  52. Leonard Andaya, The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  53. James Fox (ed.), To Speak in Pairs: Essays on the Ritual Languages of Eastern Indonesia (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988);Google Scholar
  54. Jane Drakard, ‘A kingdom of words: Minangkabau sovereignty in Sumatran history’, PhD dissertation, ANU, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anthony Reid 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Reid

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations