Skip to main content

Enlightenment and Revolution, 1680–1815

  • Chapter
A Guide to French Literature
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

In the scholarly library at the end of the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as represented by the private studies of Montaigne and La Bruyère and that great public enterprise entrusted by the Revolution to Chamfort, the Bibliothèque Nationale, the core remained the same collection of humanist classics, that bore witness to the intellectual and political empires of Greece and Rome. Writers in such a library might well feel that having a hold on the classical inheritance amounted to having a hold on the world, as texts continued to address one another across that continuum. But as Renaissance evolved towards Revolution, the context of the library changed radically, and with it, the nature of what one text could say to another. The classical originals were no longer alone on the shelf: they addressed the eighteenth-century reader from alongside those other very different texts they had already helped generate within the French context. In the landscape outside the study stood new readers with other preconceptions. When modern critics describe culture as intertextual, they mean that it is constantly woven and rewoven not only out of the interchanges of ideas in books but also out of the social and historical discourses out of which books and ideas are generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For intertextuality see Judith Still and Michael Worton, Textuality and Sexuality: Reading Theories and Practices (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), especially the Introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, Dialektik der Aufklärung (New York: Social Studies Association, 1944), trans. John Cumming, Dialectic of Enlightenment (London: Verso Editions, 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jean-François Lyotard, La Condition postmoderne, rapport sur le savoir (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jürgen Habermas, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen (Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1985), trans. Frederick Lawrence, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Oxford: Polity Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a discussion of the relationship of Foucault and Habermas to the Enlightenment see Lois McNay, Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For overviews of Enlightenment thought see Ernst Cassirer, Die Philosophie der Aufklärung (Tübingen: Mohr, 1932), trans. Fritz C. A. Koelln and James P. Pettegrove, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Hazard, La Crise de la conscience européenne (Paris: Boivin, 1935); La Pensée européenne au XVIIIe siècle: de Montesquieu à Lessing (Paris: Boivin, 1946);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacques Roger, Les Sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Armand Colin, 1963);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, 2 vols (London: Wildwood House, 1967, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. On Voltaire see Theodore Besterman, Voltaire (Harlow: Longman, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  11. René Pomeau, La Religion de Voltaire (Paris: Nizet, rev. edn, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ira O. Wade, The Intellectual Development of Voltaire (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Ira O. Wade, The Clandestine Organization and Diffusion of Philosophic Ideas in France from 1700 to 1750 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, and London: Oxford University Press, 1938);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Darnton, The Literary Underground of the Old Régime (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982), Édition et sédition: l’univers de la littérature clandestine au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Gallimard, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Robert Shackleton, Montesquieu, a Critical Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jean Starobinski, Montesquieu par lui-même (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Arthur M. Wilson, Diderot (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peter France, Diderot (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galvano Della Volpe, Rousseau e Marx e altri saggi di critica meterialistica (Rome: Editori Riuniti, 1956), trans. John Fraser, Rousseau and Marx (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1978). See also

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. E. Vaughan, The Political Writings of Rousseau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1915);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ronald Grimsley, Rousseau and the Religious Quest (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert Derathé, Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps (Paris: J. Vrin, 2nd edn 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jean Starobinski, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la transparence et l’obstacle (Paris: Gallimard, 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maurice Cranston, Jean-Jacques: The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (London: Allen Lane, 1983), and The Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1754–62 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Jean Ehrard, L’Idée de nature en France dans la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle (Geneva: Slatkine, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See C. B. Macpherson, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink and Manfred Tietz (eds), Lectures de Raynal. ‘L’Histoire des deux Indes’ en Europe et en Amérique au XVIIIe siècle (Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. For a short account of the development of economic theory in the period, see the chapter ‘“Moeurs”, “Lois” and Economies’, in Ira O. Wade, The Structure and Form of the French Enlightenment, vol. I (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977), esp. pp. 465–515.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Robert Darnton, The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie 1755–1800 (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1979); ‘Philosophers Trim the Tree of Knowledge: The Epistemological Strategy of the Encyclopédie’, in The Great Cat Massacre (USA: Basic Books, and Great Britain: Allen Lane, 1984; rpt. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  30. See also John Lough, The ‘Encyclopédie’ (Harlow: Longman, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See, on theatre, Henri Lagrave, Le Théâtre et le public à Paris de 1715–1750 (Paris: Klincksieck, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  32. Martine de Rougement, La Vie théâtrale en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris and Geneva: Champion/Slatkine, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pierre Larthomas, Le Théâtre en France au XVIIIe siècle, 2nd edn (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989). On Marivaux see

    Google Scholar 

  34. Henri Coulet and Michel Gilot, Marivaux, un humanisme expérimental (Paris: Larousse, 1973);

    Google Scholar 

  35. on Beaumarchais, René Pomeau, Beaumarchais, ou la bizarre destinée (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. John Lough, Writer and Public in France (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Angus Martin (ed. and intro.), Anthologie du conte en France 1750–99: philosophes et cœurs sensibles (Paris: UGE, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Robert Darnton, ‘Readers Respond to Rousseau: The Fabrication of Romantic Sensitivity’, in The Great Cat Massacre (USA: Basic Books, and Great Britain: Allen Lane, 1984; rpt. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  39. See Georges May, Le Dilemme du roman au XVIIIe siècle (New Haven: Yale University Press/Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963). See, for the development of the French novel,

    Google Scholar 

  40. Henri Coulet, Le Roman jusqu’à la Révolution, 2 vols (Paris: Armand Colin, 1967–8). See also

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peter Brooks, The Novel of Worldliness: Crébillon, Marivaux, Laclos, Stendhal (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vivienne Mylne, The Eighteenth-Century French Novel: Techniques of Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 1981). On individual authors see Jean Sgard, Prévost romancier (Paris: Librairie José Corti, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. and Y. Delmas, À la recherche des ‘Liaisons dangereuses’ (Paris: Mercure de France, 1964);

    Google Scholar 

  44. Laurent Versini, Laclos et la tradition: essai sur les sources et la technique des ‘Liaisons dangereuses’ (Paris: Klincksieck, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  45. William Ray, Story and History: Narrative Authority and Social Identity in the Eighteenth-Century French and English Novel (Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See, on the situation of women in the eighteenth century, Samia I. Spencer (ed.), French Women and the Age of Enlightenment (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jennifer Birkett, ‘“A Mere Matter of Business”: Marriage, Divorce and the French Revolution’, in Elizabeth M. Craik (ed.), Marriage and Property (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dorinda Outram, The Body and the French Revolution: Sex, Class and Political Culture (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lynn Hunt (ed.), Eroticism and the Body Politic (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991). See, on women writers,

    Google Scholar 

  50. Joan Hinde Stewart, Gynographs: French Novels by Women of the Late Eighteenth Century (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  51. On the French-English connection see F. C. Green, Minuet: A Critical Survey of French and English Literary Ideas in the Eighteenth Century (London: Dent, 1935);

    Google Scholar 

  52. H. W. Streeter, The Eighteenth-Century English Novel in French Translation: A Bibliographical Study (New York: Publications of the Institute of French Studies, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Béatrice Didier, Écrire la Révolution: 1789–99 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989). On the ‘domestication’ of the French Revolution, see

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jack Hayward, After the French Revolution: Six Critics of Democracy and Nationalism (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), which includes studies of Joseph de Maistre, Saint-Simon, Constant, Tocqueville, Proudhon and Blanqui.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See, on the press and publishing, Robert Darnton and Daniel Roche (eds), Revolution in Print: The Press in France 1775–1800 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989); Lough, Writer and Public in France;

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jeremy D. Popkin, Revolutionary News: The Press in France (1789–99) (Durham, USA: Duke University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  57. See, on the orators, Didier, Écrire la Révolution; essays by Philippe Roger, Peter France and Eric Walter in John Renwick (ed.), Language and Rhetoric of the Revolution (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  58. See Graham Rodmell, French Drama of the Revolutionary Years (London and New York: Routledge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Adorno and Horkheimer, Dialektik der Aufklärung; Roland Barthes, Sade, Fourier, Loyola (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gilbert Lély, Vie du marquis de Sade (Paris: Mercure de France, rev. edn, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lucienne Frappier-Mazur, Sade et l’écriture de l’orgie (Paris: Nathan, 1991). See also the prefatory essays by various scholars in

    Google Scholar 

  62. D.-A.-F. de Sade, Oeuvres complètes, vol. I, ed. Michel Delon (Paris: Gallimard, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  63. See Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, ‘Du social au mental: une analyse ethnographique’, in Histoire de la France rurale, eds Georges Duby and Armand Wallon, vol. 2 (Paris: Seuil, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mark Poster, The Utopian Thought of Restif de la Bretonne (New York: New York University Press, 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pierre Testud, Restif de la Bretonne et la création littéraire (Geneva and Paris: Librairie Droz, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Published in Élisabeth Badinter (ed.), Condorcet, Prudhomme, Goyomar … Paroles d’hommes (1790–93) (Paris: POL éditeur, 1989), pp. 174–5. On women in the Revolution see

    Google Scholar 

  67. Paule-Marie Duhet (ed.), Cahiers de doléances des femmes et autres textes (Paris: des femmes, 1981); Les Femmes dans la Révolution française (Paris: EDHIS, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  68. Élisabeth Badinter (ed.), A. L. Thomas, Diderot, Madame d’Épinay … Qu’est-ce qu’une femme? (Paris: POL éditeur, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  69. Élisabeth Roudinesco, Madness and Revolution: The Lives and Legends of Théroigne de Méricourt (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  70. Olwen H. Hufton, Women and the Limits of Citizenship in the French Revolution (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  71. See Gabriel de Broglie, Madame de Genlis (Paris: Librairie Académique Perrin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  72. See Simone Balayé, Madame de Staël: lumières et liberté (Paris: Éditions Klincksieck, 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  73. Marie-Claire Vallois, Fictions féminines: Mme de Staël et les voix de la Sibylle (Saratoga, USA: ANMA Libri, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  74. Madelyn Gutwirth, Avriel Goldberger, and Karyna Szmurlo (eds), Germaine de Staël: Crossing the Borders (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  75. Simone Balayé, Madame de Staël — écrire, lutter, vivre (Geneva: Droz, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Jennifer Birkett and James Kearns

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birkett, J., Kearns, J. (1997). Enlightenment and Revolution, 1680–1815. In: A Guide to French Literature. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25758-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics