Advertisement

Abstract

The success of the malign masters can be explained sociologically, but only in general terms, for that kind of explanation does not really account for the specific career path that each followed and how out of this arose the groupings of supporters who would eventually constitute his following. The human factors that play such a large part in winning over people to a cause, especially in its early stages, are also operative in philosophy. Sometimes one single friendship might be of crucial importance in establishing a reputation and gaining supporters. On its own a single relationship cannot create a philosophical movement, but in the right social setting one influential friendship can multiply itself many times over, whereas under unfavourable conditions it remains isolated and withers in the bud. The interweaving between the personal and the social is of great complexity and can only be analysed by unravelling and untangling the numerous separate threads which make up the web of the cultural fabric. I shall concentrate in the first place on personal relations, following these like a kind of red thread throughout all the varied career patterns of the malign masters. After that I shall consider more general social factors.

Keywords

Vienna Circle Frankfurt School Class Consciousness Influential Friendship Independent Thinker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Herbert Feigl, ‘Wiener Kreis in America’, in D. Fleming and G. Baylyn (eds.), The Intellectual Migration (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969), p. 638.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Leszek Kolakowski, Modernity on Endless Trial (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990), p. 108.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Giovanna Borradori (ed.), Recording Metaphysics: The New Italian Philosophy (Northwest University Press, Evanston, Ill. 1990), p. 202.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Merle E. Brown, Neo-Idealist Aesthetics: Croce, Gentile, Collingwood (Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1966).Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Paul Engelmann, Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1967), p. xiv.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Elizabeth Young-Bruehl, Hanna Arendt, For Love of the World (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1982), p. 307.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    L. Kohler and H. Saner (eds.), Arendt-Jaspers Correspondence 1926–1969 (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1992), p. 628.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    C. Wright Mills, Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Russell Jacoby, The Last Intellectuals (Basic Books, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  10. 19.
    See Harry Redner, The Ends of Science: An Essay in Scientific Authority (Westview Press, Boulder, Col., Westview Press, Boulder, Col. 1987), ch. 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harry Redner 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Redner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations