Skip to main content
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

The biggest outrage that the malign masters perpetrated against their fathers was to return surreptitiously to their philosophical enemies, the great Idealists. The fathers believed that they had fought a long and finally victorious battle against the influence of Idealism and that it would never resurface. Russell, Husserl and Weber thought that they had put paid to Idealism in their youth. And even Croce, who belatedly came to Hegel at a late stage, held that only some limited aspects of Hegelianism could be kept alive; the rest was ‘dead’. Little did they suspect that their sons harboured hidden affinities for the Idealism which would become so patently apparent in their primary masterworks. Thus Wittgenstein revived Schopenhauer, Heidegger recovered Schelling and Lukács and Gentile reworked Left and Right Hegelianism respectively, together with relevant aspects of Fichte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter Hylton, ‘Hegel as Analytic Philosophy’, in C.F. Beiser (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Hegel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), p. 477.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas E. Willey, Back to Kant: The Revival of Kantianism in German Social and Historical Thought 1860–1919 (Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1978), p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tom Rockmore, Heidegger and French Philosophy (Routledge, London, 1995), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in S. Morris Engel, ‘Schopenhauer’s Impact on Wittgenstein’, in Michael Fox (ed.), Schopenhauer: His Philosophical Achievement (Harvester Press, Sussex, 1980), p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Avraham Weiner, Genius and Talent: Schopenhauer’s Influence on Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy (Associated University Presses, London and Toronto, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Gershon Weiler, Mauthner’s Critique of Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacques Le Rider, Le Cas Otto Weininger (Presses Universaires de France, Paris, 1982), p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbert Marcuse, Reason and Revolution, Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory (Humanities Press, NY, 1954), p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Jean Bollack and Heinz Wismann, ‘Heidegger der Unumgängliche’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Die Politische Ontologie Martin Heideggers (Syndikat, Frankfurt, 1976), pp. 115–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Harry Redner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Redner, H. (1997). Forefathers and Other Ancestral Figures. In: Malign Masters Gentile Heidegger Lukács Wittgenstein. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25707-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics