Abstract
What is the place, the ‘taking place’, that the idea of the ‘between’ designates? What event does the figure of the ‘between’ acknowledge, for example in the act, in any act of writing, so that the subject finds himself or herself, positioned, albeit momentarily and in an instance which is both unique and iterable? Can we legitimately talk of ‘the between’ when no place exists as such, other than as the necessary and provisional correspondence between identities (which space exists as the taking place of identity)? Why might love name otherwise the place of ‘between’, not in some abstract fashion, but in the event of taking place?
We recognise the alphabet; we are not sure of the language
George Eliot
… car chacun est celui qui vient de perdre la face en l’autre … oublier l’unité
… for everyone is the one who has just lost face in the other … forget unity
Michel Deguy
When I write ‘what interests me’, I am designating not only an object of interest, but the place that I am in the middle of…
Jacques Derrida
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Eve Tavor Bannet, Postcultural Theory: Critical Theory after the Marxist Paradigm (New York: Paragon House, 1993), 80–7.
Copyright information
© 1997 Julian Wolfreys
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolfreys, J. (1997). The place between: sending love and resisting identity or, between Derrida, Deronda and Deguy. In: the rhetoric of Affirmative Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25699-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25699-0_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-69451-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25699-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)