The Place of Phronesis in the Methodology of Theology
A significant recent development in philosophy is the search for new models of rationality. This is the result of widespread discontent with the traditional model of rationality as embodied in argument and argument as paradigmatically mathematical, a discontent that is not limited to philosophers of a particular school, nor to those specializing in certain areas of philosophy. It can be found not only among epistemologists and philosophers of mind, but also among moral and political philosophers, philosophers of science and philosophers of religion. It can be found among analytic philosophers, as well as among those primarily influenced by continental Europe. And it has guided some historical research on the methodology of ancient philosophy. The importance of this development for the rationality of religious belief is obvious. At the very least it shows that the search for a new model of rationality among theistic philosophers is not just an ad hoc reaction to religious scepticism, but is something that would be necessary in any case.
KeywordsEurope Defend Peru Carol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.This is even true of Ernest Sosa, who believes the concept of intellectual virtue should have an important place in the analysis of knowledge. See Sosa’s paper ‘Knowledge and Intellectual Virtue’, The Monist 68 (April 1985), 226–45. The closest theory I know of to the one I advocate is that of James Montmarquet in Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Voluntariness (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
- 9.Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), p. 178.Google Scholar
- 12.Troels Engberg-Pederson, Aristotle’s Theory of Moral Insight (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
- 15.George Mavrodes, Revelation in Religious Belief (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
- 17.Rosalind Hursthouse, ‘Virtue Theory and Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, 3 (June 1991), 223–46.Google Scholar
- 2.W. V. O. Quine and J. S. Ullian, The Web of Belief 2nd edition (New York: Random House, 1978), p. 133.Google Scholar
- 6.For an account of Christian doctrine as a practice, see James Wm. McClendon, Jr, Doctrine: Systematic Theology, Volume II (Nashville TN: Abingdon Press, 1994), ch. 1.Google Scholar