Skip to main content

Envy between women

  • Chapter
Psychotherapy with Women
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

It has traditionally been assumed within our culture that women have a strong streak of covert envy, spite and malice that emerges in a particularly virulent form with other members of their own sex. In the early decades of the 20th century fierce controversy raged about Freud’s theory that penis envy was crucial to female psychology. Some of Freud’s colleagues accused him of male bias because he failed to see the deep envy that men felt for women. For instance Karen Horney, a German psychoanalyst, put forward the thesis that men subjugated women and excluded them from social and political power because of their envy of women’s procreative capacities (1926). Contemporary feminists continue to discuss whether Freud was denigrating women or simply describing their unenviable position in societies where they are still second-class. ‘No phallus, no power, except those winning ways of gaining one’, wrote Juliet Mitchell, in support of Freud (1974: 96). I have written extensively elsewhere about envy between the sexes — so-called ‘penis’ and ’womb’ envy — both of which I believe to be absolutely crucial to the perpetuation of sexual inequality (Maguire, 1995).

1 This chapter is a substantially revised version of my paper ‘Casting the evil eye: envy between women’, originally published in S. Ernst & M. Maguire, Living with the Sphinx: Papers from the Women’s Therapy Centre, The Women’s Press, London, 1987.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, K. (1919) ‘A particular form of neurotic resistance against the psycho-analytic method’, in Selected Papers of Karl Abraham, Hogarth Press, London 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1933) New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Pelican, Harmondsworth 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937) ‘Analysis terminable and interminable’, in Selected Essays, vol. 23, Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1926) ‘The flight from womanhood’, in J. Baker Miller (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Women, Penguin, London 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, W.G. (1969) ‘A critical review of the status of the envy concept’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50:533–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, B. (1986) ‘Envy in everyday life’, in E. Bott Spillius & M. Feldman (eds), Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change, Routledge, London 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1957) ‘Envy and gratitude’, in Envy and Gratitude and Other Essays, Delta edition, Dell Co., New York 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (1995) Men, Women, Passion and Power: Gender Issues in Psychotherapy, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1974) Psychoanalysis and Feminism, Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riviere, J. (1936) ‘A contribution to the analysis of the negative therapeutic reaction’, in A. Hughes (ed.), The Inner World and Joan Riviere, Karnac, London 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1979) Klein, Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1971) ‘Creativity and its origins’, in Playing and Reality, Pelican, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Marilyn Lawrence Marie Maguire Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 1997 Marie Maguire

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maguire, M. (1997). Envy between women. In: Lawrence, M., Maguire, M., Campling, J. (eds) Psychotherapy with Women. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25615-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics