Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Swansea Studies in Philosophy ((SWSP))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

In one of its traditional usages, the word ‘ethics’ refers to a branch of philosophy in the same sense as the word ‘logic’ refers to another. Calling ethics a branch of philosophy is traditionally meant to do something more specific than simply describe ethics as philosophical thinking about moral issues and about the phenomena of human life which we call ethical. A branch of philosophy is usually defined by stating its tasks and its main questions, and it is perhaps symptomatic of the nature of the philosophical problems about ethics that many writers have felt a need to redefine its subject matter and to offer their own statements of its tasks and main questions. Ethics seems to be a branch of philosophy which more than other branches tends to call itself into question.

a man may be just and virtuous without having precise ideas of justice and virtue. The opinion that those and the like words stand for general notions, abstracted from all particular persons and actions, seems to have rendered Morality very difficult, and the study thereof of small use to mankind. (George Berkeley, The Principles of Human Knowledge, § 100)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974, 2nd edition) § 128.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hilary Putnam (Realism with a Human Face, 135–141) argues, for instance, that ‘without values we would not have a world’. Another example of the same tendency is Jürgen Habermas, who claims to have ‘The insight that the truth of statements is linked in the last analysis to the intention of the good and true life …’ (J. Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interest, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987, 317). These conceptions seem to be adapted to the idea of philosophical clarification as a means to certain political or ideological ends, an idea which is very much in accord with the spirit of our age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stenlund, S. (1997). Ethics, Philosophy and Language. In: Alanen, L., Heinämaa, S., Wallgren, T. (eds) Commonality and Particularity in Ethics. Swansea Studies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25602-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics