Field Methods in the Study of Social Dialects

  • Walt Wolfram
  • Ralph W. Fasold
Part of the Modern Linguistics Series book series


In our attempt to collect meaningful data, there are two major areas of concern: (1) the choice of a sample population and (2) the elicitation of adequate speech data.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bickerton, D. (1971) ‘Inherent Variability and Variable Rules’, Foundations of Language, 7, pp. 457–92.Google Scholar
  2. Bryden, J. D. (1968) An Acoustic and Social Dialect Analysis of Perceptual Variables in Listener Identification and Rating of Negro Speakers. USOE Project No. 7-C-003.Google Scholar
  3. Fasold, R. W. (1972) Tense Marking in Black English: A Linguistic and Social Analysis ( Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics).Google Scholar
  4. Fishman, J. A. (1969) ‘Bilingual Attitudes and Behaviors’, Language Sciences, 5, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
  5. Labov, W. (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City ( Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics).Google Scholar
  6. Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. and Lewis, J. (1968) A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. USOE Final Report, Research Project No. 3288.Google Scholar
  7. Levine, L. and Crockett, H. J. (1967) ‘Friends’ Influence on Speech,’ Sociological Inquiry, 37, pp. 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Samarin, W. J. (1967) Field Linguistics: A Guide to Linguistic Field Work (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).Google Scholar
  9. Shuy, R. W., Baratz, J. C. and Wolfram, W. (1969) Sociolinguistic Factors in Speech Identification. NIMH Final Report, Project No. MH 15048–01.Google Scholar
  10. Shuy, R. W., Wolfram, W. A. and Riley, W. K. (1968) Field Techniques in an Urban Language Study ( Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics).Google Scholar
  11. Warner, W. L. (1960) Social Class in America ( New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  12. Williams, F. (1973) ‘Some Research Notes on Dialect Attitudes and Stereotypes’, in Shuy, R. W. and Fasold, R. W. (eds), Language. Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press ).Google Scholar
  13. Williams, F., Whitehead, J. L. and Miller, L. M. (1971) Attitudinal Correlates of Children’s Speech Characteristics. USOE Research Report Project No. 0–0336.Google Scholar
  14. Wolfram, W. (1969) A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech ( Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics).Google Scholar
  15. Wolfram, W. (1973) ‘On What Basis Variable Rules?’, in Studies in New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Wolfram, W. in collaboration with Shiels, M. and Fasold, R. W. (1971) Overlapping Influence in the English of Second–generation Puerto Rican Teenagers in East Harlem. Final Report, USOE Project No. 3–70–0033(508).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walt Wolfram
  • Ralph W. Fasold

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations