Skip to main content
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, a nation’s security rested on possessing a military strong enough to deter or defeat invaders, and self-sufficiency in food and mineral resources. Strategic minerals were those smelted and hammered into weapons or coin. Those strategic minerals of the pre-industrial age included tin, copper, gold, silver, and iron ore. Nature’s uneven distribution of minerals has shaped the course of history. Over the millennia, nations that lacked natural resources often conquered other peoples to get them. In the pre-industrial era, the most successful conquerors were the European states which subjugated the entire western hemisphere and knit the world’s far corners within an increasingly dense trade network in search of minerals and other sources of wealth. But this first great wave of global imperialism died with the American Revolution of the late eighteenth century and the Latin American revolutions of the early nineteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Timothy Egan, “Billions at Stake in Debate on Gold Rush,” New York Times, August 14, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Cushman, “Forced, U.S. Sells Gold Land for Trifle,” New York Times, May 17, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egan, “Billions at Stake in Debate on Gold Rush,” New York Times, August 14, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Of all sources consulted for this section, the most useful was David Howard Davies, Energy Politics (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard Ottinger, “Introduction: The Tragedy of U.S. Energy R&D Policy,” in The Politics of Research and Development, ed. John Byrne and Daniel Rich (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1986), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keith Schneider, “Clinton to Revamp Energy Department Role,” New York Times, November 22, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernard Shanks, This Land Is Your Land (San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1984), pp. 124–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walter Rosenbaum, Energy Politics and Public Policy (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1987) p. 176;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keith Schneider, “U.S. Mine Inspectors Charge Interference by Agency Director,” New York Times, November 22, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted in Harry Caudil, My Land Is Dying (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1973), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charles O. Jones and Randall Strahan, “The Effects of Energy Politics on Congressional and Executive Organizations in the 1970s,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 2 (May 1985), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted in James Everett Katz, Congress and National Energy Policy (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Energy, The National Energy Policy Plan (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edward Byers and Thomas B. Fitzpatrick, “American and Oil Companies: Tentative Tolerance in a Time of Plenty,” Public Opinion vol. 8, no. 6 (December/January 1986), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, May 1992, Table 9. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cited in Christopher Flavin, Electricity’s Future: The Shift to Efficiency and Small-Scale Power (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, 1984), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. General Services Administration, National Archives, Presidential Documents, 13, 17 (April 25, 1977), p. 573.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keith Schneider, “Clinton to Revamp Energy Department Role,” New York Times, November 22, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peter Passell, “Cheapest Protection of Nature May Lie in Texas, Not Laws,” New York Times, November 24, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthew Wald, “Efficient Power from Fuel Gases,” New York Times, June 10, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lily Whiteman, “Recent Efforts to Stop Abuse of SMCRA: Have They Gone Far Enough?” Environmental Law 20 (Fall 1990), p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence MacDonnell, “Mineral Law in the United States: A Study in Legal Change,” in L. MacDonnell and P. Bates (eds), Natural Resources, Policy, and Law (Washington, DC: Island Press, 1994), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Young, Mining the Earth Worldwatch Paper 109, July 1992, pp. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas Watkins, Gold and Silver in the West (Palo Alto, CA: American West Publishing, 1971), p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 William R. Nester

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nester, W.R. (1997). Mines, Drills, and Energy. In: The War for America’s Natural Resources. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25553-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics