Skip to main content

Uncertainty as a Management Evaluation Tool for Infrastructure Projects

  • Chapter
Regional Science: Perspectives for the Future

Abstract

Infrastructure policy is implemented through the planning for individual projects. Initial infrastructure planning is based on the simple calculus of rate of return on investment (ROI) or cost benefit (C/B) analysis, while infrastructure capacity expansion is a function of assessing existing capacity and forecasting future demand levels (Manne (1961; 1967), Meier (1977), Smith (1980), Freidenfelds (1981), Liebermann (1989)). However, the parameters of this calculus are embedded in substantial and pervasive uncertainty (Haynes and Li Qiangsheng, 1993). On the supply side, the future costs of existing infrastructure technology are made uncertain by volatility in the capital markets which affects interest rates and assumptions about appropriate discount levels (Haynes and Krmenec (1989), Haynes et al. (1984)). On the demand side, the increased reliance on user charges and their impact on the elasticity of demand increases uncertainty in forecasting usage levels. Further complicating uncertainties in supply and demand is the rapid pace of technological innovation, particularly in the telecommunications and transportation sectors, and the consequent impact on technological obsolescence and substitution. Witness the impact of telefax technology on the overnight letter delivery service and the effect of e-mail on both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1973) ‘Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle’, in B. N. Petron and F. Csaki (eds), 2nd Annual International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267–81 (Budapest: Akademiai Kiado).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. and A. C. Fisher (1974) ‘Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty and Irreversibility’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 88, pp. 12–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, R. (1984) ‘Critical Signals for Making Go/No Go Decisions in New Product Development’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 1, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. (1982) ‘Optimal Sequential Investment when Capital is Not Readily Reversible’, Journal of Finance, vol. 37, pp. 763–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. D., J. L. Higle and R. L. Smith (1992) ‘Capacity Expansion Under Stochastic Demand’, Operations Research, vol. 40, pp. 5210–5216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. (1983) ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Cyclical Investment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98, pp. 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthouex, P. M. and L. B. Polkowski (1970) ‘Design Capacities to Accommodate Forecast Uncertainties’, Journal of Sanitary Engineering Div ASCE, vol. 96, pp. 1183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, B. S. and W. J. Fabrycky (1990) Systems Engineering and Analysis (2nd edn) (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S. Jr. (1947) Urban Land Use Planning (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chames, A., W. W. Cooper, J. K. DeVoe, and D. B. Learner (1966) ‘DEMON: Decision Mapping Via Optimum Go/No Go Networks — A Model for Marketing New Products’, Management Science, vol. XII, no. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chames, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978) ‘Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units’, European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 2, pp. 429–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenery, H. B. (1952) ‘Overcapacity and the Acceleration Principle’, Econometrica, vol. 20, pp. 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. H. and I. C. M. Cunningham (1981) Marketing: A Managerial Approach (Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, D., S. P. Sethi and N. Okada (1989) ‘Planning for Surprise: Water Resources Development Under Demand and Supply Uncertainty, I: The General Model’, Management Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 149–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidenfelds, J. (1981) Capacity Expansion: Analysis of Simple Models With Applications (New York: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, N. A. J. and J. B. Peacock (1975) Statistical Distributions (London: Butterworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. H. (1987) ‘Policy Analysis and Evaluation Research After Twenty Years’, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. E. and A. Krmenec (1989) ‘A Sensitivity Assessment of Uncertainty in Infrastructure Expansion’, Annals of Regional Science, vol. 31, pp. 301–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. E. and Li Qiangsheng (1993) ‘Policy Analysis and Uncertainty: Lessons from the IVHS Transportation Development Process’, Journal of Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 17, pp. 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. E. and R. G. Stubbings (1987) ‘Planning and Philosophy: The Anthropology of Action’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. E. et al. (1984) ‘Planning for Capacity Expansion: Stochastic Process and Game Theoretic Approaches’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. (1974) ‘Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: the Irreversible Effect’, American Economic Review, vol. 64, pp. 1006–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., (1959) Information Theory and Statistics (New York: John Wiley) pp. 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. E. and E. G. Prescatt (1982) ‘Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations’, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 1345–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B. (1989) ‘Capacity Utilization: Theoretical Models and Empirical Results’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 40, pp. 155–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majd, S. and R. S. Pindyck (1987) ‘Time to Build, Option Value, and Investment Decisions’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 18, pp. 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. (1961) ‘Capacity Expansion and Probabilistic Growth’, Econometrica, vol. 29, pp. 632–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. (1967) Investment for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location, and Time-Phasing (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. and D. Siegel (1986) ‘The Value of Waiting to Invest’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, pp. 707–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. M. (1977) ‘Game Theory Approach to Design Uncertainty’, Journal of the Environmental Engineering Div ASCE, vol. 103, pp. 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. F. (1976) Multivariate Statistical Methods (2nd edn) (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnel, A. H. (1990) ‘How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?’, New England Economic Review, September, pp. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1990) ‘International Workshop on Concurrent Engineering Design’, IC2 Institute, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. E. (1991) ‘Historical Perspectives on Infrastructure Investment: How Did We Get Where We Are?’, Conference on Infrastructure Needs, Project Report, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, K. and M. L. Weitzman (1981) ‘Funding Criteria for Research, Development and Exploration Projects’, Econometrica, vol. 49, pp. 1261–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communication’, Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 37, pp. 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1980) ‘Optimal Expansion Policies for the Deterministic Capacity Problem’, Engineering Economics, vol. 25, pp. 149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1967) ‘Geometric Rate of Growth of Demand’, in A. Mannel (ed.), Investments for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location, and Time-Phasing (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press) pp. 151–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. L. and G. M. Katz (1975) ‘Pre-Test-Market Models: Validation and Managerial Implications’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 20, pp. 221–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. and R. Cardenas (1994) Handbook of Interactive Management (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M., W. Newey and M. Robin (1981) ‘Sequential R&D Strategy for Synfuels’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 12, pp. 574–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B. J. and M. A. Maidique (1990) ‘A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test’, Management Science, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 867–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Manas Chatterji

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haynes, K.E., Phillips, F.Y., Srivastava, R.K. (1997). Uncertainty as a Management Evaluation Tool for Infrastructure Projects. In: Chatterji, M. (eds) Regional Science: Perspectives for the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25514-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics