Skip to main content

Planning for National Development: An Agenda Guided by the Socioeconomic System’s Social Philosophy

  • Chapter
Book cover Regional Science: Perspectives for the Future
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of sovereignty, which involves self determination, is undermined with each suggestion for harmonization of socioeconomic systems and the globalization of trade, which is deemed to be inevitable. Being able to trade voluntarily with any country is highly desirable, but having to transform one’s way of life — from one that is desirable to one that is not desirable — is a serious problem. In the interest of social harmony and social welfare, each country has to start out with its own social philosophy. Some countries wholeheartedly desire the free market to determine the goods and services that are to be produced, the number of unemployed workers, the investment in human capital, the rate of interest and so on. Other countries, however, are coerced in overt and covert ways to adopt the free market system although that system will not serve the needs of the citizenry of those countries. To say that the free market provides the answer for all socioeconomic systems is to ignore the fact that the free market is blind and indifferent to human needs. The unconditional requirement, that this system be adopted by developing countries, violates the rights of those sovereign nations to choose a mode of operation that would foster their desired development without infringing on the rights of other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberts, W. W. (1979) ‘Do Oligopolists Earn “Noncompetitive” Rates of Return?’, Economic Journal, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. H. Locke (1970) ‘Production Scheduling, Intermediate Goods, and Labor Productivity’, American Economic Review, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G. J. (1985) ‘The Validity of Profits-Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC’s Line of Business Data’, American Economic Review, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, R. R. and C. K. Clague (1975) ‘An Economic Analysis of Capital Utilization’, Southern Economic Journal, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1976) ‘The Second War Between the States’, 17 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, A. C. (1964) Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinloy, P. (1980) ‘Sources of Quality Change in Labor Input’, American Economic Review, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B. (1984) ‘Unionization and Firm Performance: The Impact on Profits, Growth and Productivity’, American Economic Review, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, R. M. and B. G. Hickman (1980) ‘Investment and Growth in an Econometric Model of the United States’, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crihfield, J. B. (1989) ‘A Structural Empirical Analysis of Metropolitan Labor Demand’, Journal of Regional Science, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, D. (1984) ‘Regions, Antiregions, and Their Dynamic Stability: The U.S. Case (1929–1979)’, Journal of Regional Science, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1980) ‘Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement’, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, S. W. (1978) ‘Capital Productivity, Money Flows, and Inflation’, Business Economics, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, W. M. (1974) ‘Measuring the Productivity of Nonfinancial Corporations’, Monthly Labor Review, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. Knox Lovell (1985) The Measurement of Efficiency of Production (Boston, Mass.: Kluwer-Nijhoff).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, J. A. and J. L. Medoff (1985) ‘Labor and Output Over the Business Cycle: Some Direct Evidence’, American Economic Review, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenoaltea, S. (1976) ‘Real Value Added and the Measurement of Industrial Production’, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, National Bureau of Economic Research, Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. W. (1930) Tables of Applied Mathematics in Finance, Insurance Statistics (Ann Arbor, Mich.: George Wahr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D. F. and S. A. Rhoades (1976) ‘Concentration and Productivity Changes in the Long and Short Run’, Southern Economic Journal, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. M. (1970) ‘Unbalanced Growth and Regional Development’, in David L. McKee, Robert D. Dean and William L. Leahy (eds), Regional Economics: Theory and Practice (New York: The Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. (1993) ‘Against the Economic Orthodoxy: On the Making of the East Asian Miracle’, Economy and Society, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R. (1987) ‘The Validity of ROI as a Measure of Business Performance’, American Economic Review, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, J. (1978) ‘Productivity and the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts’, Business Economics, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C., A. Knox and R. C. Sickles (1983) ‘Testing Efficiency Hypotheses in Joint Production: A Parametric Approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. D. and M. Denny (1979) ‘Factor-Augmenting Technical Progress and Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing’, International Economic Review, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, N. (1970) ‘Some Approaches to the Theory and Measurement of Total Factor Productivity: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsday (1993) ‘G-7 Summit’, 7 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, E. S. (1990) ‘How Diversified is New England?’, New England Economic Review, November/December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, G. L. (1985) ‘Accounting Rates of Return’, American Economic Review, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W. E. G. (1969) Productivity and Technical Change (2nd edn) (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvary, S. C. W. (1991) ‘Measuring the Quality of Regional Economic Conditions: Preliminary Evidence on Some US Regions’, Journal of Economic Democracy, July–September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvary, S. C. W. (1990) ‘Financial Accounting Information and Microeconomic Analysis: A Basis for Macroeconomic Policy Decisions — A Research Agenda’, Journal of Economic Democracy, January–March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvary, S. C. W. (1989) An Analytical Framework for Accounting Theory, McQueen Accounting Monograph Series, vol. 5 (Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvary, S. C. W. (1985) Accounting: A Library of Quantifications, McQueen Accounting Monograph Series, vol. 1 (Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., W. F. Long, S. Martin, D. C. Mueller, G. Pascoe, D. J. Ravenscraft, J. T. Scott and L. W. Weiss (1987) ‘The Validity of Studies with Line of Business Data: Comment’, American Economic Review, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1985) ‘Do Markets Differ Much?’, American Economic Review, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. J. (1991) The Business Cycle: Growth and Crisis Under Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, W. A. and Bonini, C. P. (1967) Statistical Analysis for Business Decisions (Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1984) ‘The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis’, Econometrica, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal (1985) ‘The Road Back’, 1 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1993) ‘Economic Transition: Can Theory Help?’, European Economic Review, vol. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Jong Keun (1979) ‘Capital Utilization, Productivity, and Output Gap’, Review of Economics and Statistics, February.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Manas Chatterji

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salvary, S.C.W. (1997). Planning for National Development: An Agenda Guided by the Socioeconomic System’s Social Philosophy. In: Chatterji, M. (eds) Regional Science: Perspectives for the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25514-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics