Advertisement

Japan’s Contributions to International Society: The Limits Imposed by Domestic Political Structures

Chapter
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

In the light of its new international responsibilities in a post-Cold War system there is no more pressing issue for Japan than its internationalisation. It is true that Japan can boast rapidly expanding economic and political ties with the rest of the world, but it would be naive to think that internationalisation merely means the increase of cross-border information or human exchanges. Although this is a necessary condition for true progress in Japan’s understanding of, and responsiveness to, the expectations of the international community, it is not sufficient.

Keywords

Private Sector Economic Cooperation Advisory Council Official Development Assistance Recipient Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Development Assistance Committee, ‘Aid Review 1990/1991: Report by the Secretariat and Questions for the Review of Japan’, Paris, OECD, 1991, p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Sumi Kazuo (ed.), Noo moa ODA baramaki enjo (No More Wasted ODA), Tokyo, JICC Shuppankyoku, 1992;Google Scholar
  3. Murai Yoshinori (ed.), Kensho: Nippon no ODA (Testimony: Japan’s ODA), Tokyo, Gakuyo Shobo, 1992;Google Scholar
  4. Murai Yoshinori et al, Musekinin enjo ODA taikoku Nippon (Japan: The Irresponsible ODA Superpower), Tokyo, JICC Shuppankyoku, 1989;Google Scholar
  5. Mainichi Shimbun, Shakaibu, ODA Shuzaihan. Kokusai enjo bijinesu — ODA was doo tsukawarete iru ka (The International Aid Business — How is ODA being Used?), Tokyo Yaki Shobo, 1990;Google Scholar
  6. Asahi Shimbun ‘Enjo’ Shuzaihan. Enjo Tojokoku Nippon (Japan, the Developing Country in Aid), Tokyo: Asahi Shimbunsha. 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Doi Takako, Murai Yoshinori, and Yoshimura Keiichi, ODA Kaikaku (ODA Reform: English title: For Whose Benefit?), Tokyo, Shakai Shisosha, 1990: in English.Google Scholar
  8. see Margee Ensign, Doing Good or Doing Well? Japan’s Foreign Aid Programme, New York, Columbia University Press, 1992; and the winner of the 1993 Loeb Award for Outstanding Business Journalism, Pete Cary and Lewis M. Simons, ‘Profits and Power: Japan’s Foreign Aid Machine’, The San Jose Mercury News, 19–21 April 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    Insight: Australian Foreign Affairs and Trade Issues, Vol. 2, No. 13, 2 August 1993, p. 16.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    Frank Upham, Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    Keidanren , Kokusai koken no tame no kongo no keizai kyoryoku no arikata — Seifu kaihatsu enjo taiko no sakutei in mukete (Economic Cooperation for International Contribution), Tokyo, Keidanren, 24 March 1992;Google Scholar
  12. Keidanren , Waga-kuni no enjo ritzen to kongo no seifu kaihatsu enjo no arikata ni tsuite (Japan’s ODA: Its Philosophy and Future Development), Tokyo, Keidanren, 26 June 1990;Google Scholar
  13. Rinji Gyosei Kaikaku Suishin Shingikai, Kokusaika tai’o — Kokumin seikatsu jushi no gyosei kaikaku ni kansuru dai-ichiji toshin (Responding to Internationalisation — The First Report on Administrative Reform: Valuing the People’s Life), Tokyo, Prime Minister’s Office, 4 July 1991.Google Scholar
  14. Keizai Doyukai, Kokusai kyoryoku no arata na tenkai o motomete (Toward a New Direction in International Cooperation), Tokyo, Keizai Doyukai, 19 June 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Sato Seizaburo and Matsuzald Tetsuhisa, Jiminto Seiken (LDP Rule), Tokyo, Chuo Koronsha, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 10.
    Muraniatsu Michio, Ito Mitsutoshi and Tsujinaka Yutaka, Sengo nihon no atsuryoku dantai (Pressure Groups in Post-war Japan), Tokyo, Toko Keizai, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    T.J. Pempel, ‘The Unbundling of “Japan, Inc.”: The Changing Dynamics of Japanese Policy Formation’, Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 1987, pp. 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 12.
    Richard J. Samuels, The Business of the Japanese State-Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Ithaca, NY, 1987, p. 2.Google Scholar
  19. 13.
    Daniel I. Okimoto, Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1989, pp. 226, 228.Google Scholar
  20. 14.
    Muranuttsu Michio and Ellis Krauss, ‘The Conservative Policy Line and the Development of Patterned Pluralism’, in Kozo Yamamura and Yasukichi Yasuba (eds), The Political Economy of Japan, Volume 1: The Domestic Transformation, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1987, pp. 516–54.Google Scholar
  21. 15.
    For the text see Ajia Kyokai, Ajia kyokai — sono mokuteki to jigyo (The Asia Association: Aims and Tasks), Tokyo, March 1959.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    Arisawa Hiromi (ed.), Showa keizai-shi (A History or the Showa Economy), Tokyo, Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha, 1976, p. 357.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    Ushiba Nobuhiko and Hara Yasushi, Nihon keizai gaiko no keifu (The Pedigree of Japan’s Economic Diplomacy), Tokyo, Asahi Shimbusha, 1979, p. 252.Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    Baisho mondai kenkyujo, Nihon no Baisho (Japan’s War Reparations), Tokyo, Sekai, January 1963, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    T.J. Pempel, ‘Bureaucratization of Policymaking in Postwar Japan’, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, November 1974, pp. 656–63;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. F. Upham, Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987, p. 199.Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    Nathaniel B. Thayer, How the Conservatives Rule Japan, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1969, p. 226.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    J.A.A. Stockwin, ‘Dynamic and Immobilist Aspects of Japanese Politics’, in J.A.A. Stockwin et al., Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan, London, Macmillan, 1988, p.13.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    Administrative Management Agency, ‘Public Corporations’, in Kiyoaki Tsuji (ed.), Public Administration in Japan, Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press, 1984, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    Chalmers Johnson, Japan’s Public Policy Companies, Washington, DC, American Enterprise Institute, 1978;Google Scholar
  31. M. Anchordoguy, ‘The Public Corporation: A Potent Japanese Policy Weapon’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 103, No. 4, 1988, pp. 707–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keidanren , Waga-kuni no enjo rinen to kongo no seifu kaihatsu enjo no arikata ni tsuite (Japan’s ODA: Its Philosophy and Future Development), Tokyo, Keidanren, 26 June 1990.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    For a fuller treatment, see David Arase, The Political Economy of Japan’s Foreign Aid, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1994.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kiyoshi Kojima and Terutomo Ozawa, Japan’s General Trading Companies: Merchants of Economic Development, OECD, Paris, 1984, p. 8.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    Keizai Dantai Rengokai, Kokusai koken no tame no kongo no keizai kyoryoku no arikata — seifu kaihatsu enjo taiko no sakusei ni mukete (Economic Cooperation for Intennational Causes — A Proposal for Formulation of Basic Rules of Official Development Assistance), Tokyo, Keidanren, 24 March 1992, p. 4.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Chalmers Johnson, ‘Japan: Who Governs? An Essay on Official Bureaucracy’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2, 1975, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 38.
    Herbert A. Simon, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decisionmaking Processes in Administrative Organizations, 3rd edn, New York, The Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  38. 40.
    Max Weber, ‘Bureaucracy’, in H. H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press, 1958, pp. 214–5.Google Scholar
  39. 41.
    Joel D. Aberbach, Robert D. Putnam and Bert A. Rockman, Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1981;Google Scholar
  40. also Joel D. Aberbach and Bert A. Rockman, The Administrative State in Industrialized Societies, Washington, DC, American Political Science Association, 1985.Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    Ogawa Ichiro, ‘The Legal Framework of Public Administration’, in Tsuji Kiyoaki (ed.), Public Administration in Japan, Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press, 1984, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
  42. 43.
    Samuel H. Beer, ‘Political Overload and Federalism’, Polity 10, 1977 pp. 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gerhard Lehmbruch, ‘Liberal Corporatism and Party Government’, Comparative Political Studies, 10, 1977, pp. 91–126.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ellis Krauss and Isobel Coles, ‘Built-in Impediments: The Political Economy of the US-Japan Construction Dispute’, in Kozo Yamamura (ed.), Japan’s Economic Structure: Should It Change?, Seattle, Washington, Society for Japanese Studies, 1990, pp. 333–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations