Abstract
At one time it was widely believed by Western observers of Japan that since Japanese culture was situationally relativist rather than individualistic and principled, the Japanese found little difficulty in changing direction fundamentally should the situation demand it.2 It seemed to follow from this that Japan was prone to sudden changes of policy direction, and indeed that the most fundamental structures of politics, such as the current constitution or the political system itself, might be expected to change suddenly in response to new circumstances and pressures. Examples usually cited to support this case were the conversion of dissident samurai during the 1860s from rejection to emulation of advanced Western countries; the shift from semi-parliamentary politics in the 1920s to ultranationalism in the 1930s; and the rapid conversion from Emperor-centred military rule to a broadly liberal and democratic order after 1945.
This chapter was completed in August 1992, approximately one year before the collapse of the single-party dominance that had characterised Japanese party politics for some 38 years. The Hosokawa coalition government, which took office in August 1993, put in place a programme of political reform, but the advent of coalition government also ushered in a period of political instability, as three differently composed governments were formed within the space of a year. Rather than rewriting this chapter to take account of the events of 1993 and 1994, the author prefers to have it as it was written in 1992, since the argument seems particularly relevant to the new political situation as it unfolds. An epilogue will briefly outline developments since 1993.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For instance, Herman Kahn, The Emerging Japanese Superstate, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1970.
Kahn’s thinking about Japan was heavily influenced by Ruth Benedict, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1946.
General Douglas MacArthur, US Senate, 82nd Congress, 1st session, Hearings before the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations, Military Situation in the Far East, Washington, 1951, pp. 310–13; quoted in Chalmers Johnson, Conspiracy at Matsukawa, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1972.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Fragile Blossom: Crisis and Change in Japan, New York, Harper and Row, 1972.
Karel van Wolferen, The Enigma of Japanese Power, London, Macmillan, 1989.
For a comparison of single-party-dominant political systems, see T. J. Pempel (ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press, 1990.
See L.F. Crisp, Australian National Government, Melbourne, Longman, Green and Co., 1965, Chapter 6.
See J.A.A. Stockwin et al., Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan, London, Macmillan, 1988.
Stephen Wilks and Maurice Wright, The Promotion and Regulation of Industry in Japan, London, Macmillan, 1991.
Kent Calder, Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan, 1949–1986, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1988.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 J. A. A. Stockwin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stockwin, J.A.A. (1997). The Need for Reform in Japanese Politics. In: Clesse, A., Inoguchi, T., Keehn, E.B., Stockwin, J.A.A. (eds) The Vitality of Japan. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25489-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25489-7_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25491-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25489-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)