Skip to main content

A Gravity Model Reformulation of Trade and Conflict in Turkey

  • Chapter
Regional Science in Developing Countries

Abstract

This chapter reports on an interdisciplinary experiment involving three fields — economics, political science and regional science — and involving a model from a fourth field, physics. The phenomenon to be understood is trade. From each of the first three fields, we take one and only one set of basic concepts, or components, to play a role in the gravity model and to provide a framework for specifying the variables used in the model: respectively, supply and demand; co-operation and hostility; and space or distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitken, N. D. (1973) ‘The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis’, American Economic Review, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 881–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985) ‘The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, pp. 474–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989) ‘The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor Proportions Theory in International Trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, pp. 143–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1992) ‘On Modeling the Impact of Arms Reductions on World Trade’, in W. Isard and C. H. Anderton (eds) Economics of Arms Reduction and Peace Process (New York: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biessen, G. (1991) ‘Is the Impact of Central Planning on the Level of Foreign Trade Really Negative?’, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 15, pp. 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brada, J. C. and J. A. Méndez (1983) ‘Regional Economic Integration and the Volume of Intraregional Trade: A Comparison of Developed and Developing Country Experience’, Kyklos, vol. 36, pp. 589–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brada, J. C., and J. A. Méndez (1985) ‘Economic Integration Among Developed, Developing and Centrally Planned Economies: A Comparative Analysis’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, pp. 549–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorowski, M. J. (1986) ‘Economic Interdependence and International Conflict’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorowski, M. and S. W. Polachek (1982) ‘Conflict and Interdependence: East-West Trade and Linkages in the Era of Détente’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 709–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanink, D. M. (1990) ‘Linder Again’, Weltwirtschaftliches-Archiv, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 257–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. and B. Lev (1973) ‘Trade and Per Capita Income Differentials: A Test of the Burenstam-Linder Hypothesis’, World Development, vol. 1, pp. 11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua Chang-i and F. Porell (1979) ‘A Critical Review of the Development of the Gravity Model’, International Regional Science Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1951) ‘Distance Inputs and the Space Economy, Part I: The Conceptual Framework’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 65, pp. 181–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1954) ‘Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 68, pp. 305–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1975) ‘A Simple Rationale for Gravity Model Type Behavior’, Papers of Regional Science Association, vol. 35, pp. 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. and C. Smith (1989) ‘On Bilateral Trade Matrix Adjustment’ (mimeo) Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., D. F. Bramhall, G. A. P. Carrothers, J. H. Cumberland, L. N. Moses, D. O. Price and E. W. Schooler (1960) Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, H. (1966) An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirer, T. W. (1988) Economic Statistics and Econometrics (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1979) Interfutures Facing the Future: Mastering the Probable and Managing the Unpredictable (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1987) OECD Economic Surveys Turkey: 1985–86 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1991) OECD Economic Surveys Turkey: 1989–90 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1992) Long-Term Prospects for the World Economy (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1993) OECD Economic Outlook (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1994) OECD National Accounts 1960–1992 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (various years) OECD Trade by Commodities Series C (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelzman, J. (1977) ‘Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance, 1954–1970’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 713–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1978) ‘Dyadic Disputes: An Economic Perspective’, Papers of the Peace Science Society, vol. 28, pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1980) ‘Conflict and Trade’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1992) ‘Conflict and Trade: An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions’, in W. Isard and C. H. Anderton (eds), Economics of Arms Reduction and Peace Process (New York: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollins, B. M. (1989a) ‘Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?’, American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 465–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollins, B. M. (1989b) ‘Conflict, Cooperation and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 737–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollins, B. M. and P. K. Brecke. (1986) ‘International Economic Processes’, in S. A. Bremer (ed.), GLOBUS: Computer Simulation of Worldwide Political and Economic Developments (Boulder, Col.: Campus-Westview).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyndick, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfeld. (1991) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. (1981) Trade Benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences’, European Economic Review, pp. 339–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayrs, L. W. (1989) ‘Trade and Conflict Revisited: Do Politics Matter?’, International Interactions, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelburne, R. C. (1987) ‘A Ratio Test of Trade Intensity and Per-Capita-Income Similarity’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 474–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summary, R. M. (1989) ‘A Political-Economic Model of US Bilateral Trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, pp. 179–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. G. and M. C. Thursby (1987) ‘Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis and Exchange Risk’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 488–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1962) Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy (New York: The Twentieth Century Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, A. (1994) ‘An Economic and Political Model of Turkish Bilateral Trade With the OECD Countries, 1970–1990: A Gravity Model Approach’, unpublished thesis, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Manas Chatterji and Yang Kaizhong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isard, W., Saltzman, S., Yaman, A. (1997). A Gravity Model Reformulation of Trade and Conflict in Turkey. In: Chatterji, M., Kaizhong, Y. (eds) Regional Science in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25459-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics