Abstract
The dominant theme of the nineteenth century was the emergence across the Southeast Asian landscape of a colossal horde of peasant producers, filling up the valleys and expanding through the hill country in their search for the land which was their primary resource. Land and its use structured their lives in fundamental ways. The labour it demanded to make it pro-ductive, the rice and other food it yielded, the power relationships spun about its allocation and use, all were defining characteristics of rural life. The land was, therefore, at the heart of the processes of peasant change. Movement, settlement and exploitation, in the contexts already outlined, created new relationships with the land, between peasants themselves and between peasants and their masters. This chapter seeks to establish how the changing context of social and economic life transformed not only conceptions of landholding and access to land, but also more fundamental appreciations about the place of land in peasant life, and to analyse the implications such changes carried for Southeast Asia’s peasantry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Anat Arbhabhirama etal., Thailand natural resources profile (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 5.
Sophon Ratanakhon, ‘Legal aspects of land occupation and development’, in Peter Kunstadter, E.C. Chapman, and Sanga Sabhasri (eds), Farmers in the forest: economic development and marginal agriculture in northern Thailand ( Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 1978 ), pp. 48–9.
Peter Kunstadter, ‘Alternatives for the development of upland areas’, in Peter Kunstadter, E.C. Chapman, and Sanga Sabhasri (eds), Farmers in the forest: economic development and marginal agriculture in northern Thailand ( Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 1978 ), p. 304.
Gehan Wijeyewardene, ‘Hydraulic society in contemporary Thailand?’, in Robert Ho and E.C. Chapman (eds), Studies of contemporary Thailand ( Canberra: Department of Human Geography, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 1973 ), p. 101.
Diana Wong, Peasants in the making: Malaysia’s Green Revolution ( Singapore: ISEAS, 1987 ), p. 37.
William L. Collier, ‘Institutional constraints on food security programmes for the poor: case study of Java’, KEM 18, 1–2 (1981), p. 79.
Wade C. Edmundson and Stella A. Edmundson, ‘A decade of village development in East Java’, RIES 19, 2 (1983), p. 47.
Brian Fegan, ‘Rural Philippines: central Luzon’, in R.J. May and Francisco Nemenzo (eds), The Philippines after Marcos ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985 ), p. 166.
Masao Kikuchi and Yujiro Hayami, ‘Technological and institutional response and income shares under demographic pressure: a comparison of Indonesian and Philippine villages’, in Geoffrey B. Hainsworth (ed.), Village-level modernization in Southeast Asia: the political economy of rice and water ( Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1982 ), pp. 175–6.
R.E. Downs, ‘A Kelantanese village in Malaya’, in Julian H. Steward (ed.), Contemporary change in traditional societies. Volume II. Asian rural societies ( Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1967 ), p. 153.
T.B. Wilson, The economics of padi production in north Malaya. Part I. Land tenure, rents, land use and fragmentation ( Kuala Lumpur: Department of Agriculture, 1958 ), p. 63.
H. Demaine and C.J. Dixon, ‘Land tenure patterns and agricultural development in N. E. Thailand: a case study of the Lam Pao irrigation area in changwat Kalasin’, JSS 60, 2 (1972), p. 58.
F. Landa Jocano, The Ilocanos: an ethnography of family and community life in the ‘locos region’ ( Quezon City: Asian Center, University of the Philippines, 1982 ), p. 27.
Paul H. Kratoska, “’Ends that we cannot foresee”: Malay reservations in British Malaya’, JSEAS 14, 1 (1983), p. 167.
Andrew Turton, ‘Northern Thai peasant society: twentieth-century transformations in political and jural structures’, JPS 3, 3 (1976), p. 275.
Leon A. Mears, The new rice economy of Indonesia ( Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1981 ), pp. 46–7.
Paul H. Kratoska, ‘The peripatetic peasant and land tenure in British Malaya’, JSEAS 16, 1 (1985), p. 43.
Gillian Hart, Power, labor, and livelihood: processes of change in rural Java ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986 ), p. 102.
Francesca Bray, The rice economies: technology and development in Asian societies ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986 ), p. 179.
Harry Luton, ‘American internal revenue policy in the Philippines to 1916’, in Norman G. Owen (ed.), Compadre colonialism: studies on the Philippines under American rule (Ann Arbor: Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia No. 3, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, 1971 ), p. 144.
Edwin E. Moise, Land reform in China and North Vietnam: consolidating the revolution at the village level ( Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983 ), p. 4.
Daniel W. Bell et al., U.S. Economic Survey Mission’s report ( Manila: Philippine Book Company, 1950 ), p. 63.
David Lim, Economic growth and development in West Malaysia, 1947–1970 ( Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Pres, 1973 ), p. 195.
Keijiro Otsuka, Violeta Cordova and Cristina C. David, ‘Green Revolution, land reform, and household income distribution in the Philippines’, EDCC 40 (1992), pp. 722–3.
Antonio Ledesma, ‘Land reform in East and Southeast Asia: a comparative approach’, PS 28 (1980), p. 320.
Eduardo C. Tadem, Grains and radicalism: the political economy of the rice industry in the Philippines: 1965–1985 (Quezon City: Third World Studies Center, University of the Philippines, 1986 ), p. 29.
Brian Fegan, ‘The Philippines: agrarian stagnation under a decaying regime’, in Gillian Hart, Andrew Turton and Benjamin White with Brian Fegan and Lim Teck Ghee (eds), Agrarian transformations: local processes and the state in Southeast Asia ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989 ), p. 141.
Benjamin White and Gunawan Wiradi, ‘Agrarian and nonagrarian bases of inequality in nine Javanese villages’, in Gillian Hart, Andrew Turton and Benjamin White with Brian Fegan and Lim Teck Ghee (eds), Agrarian transformations: local processes and the state in Southeast Asia ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989 ), p. 299.
David A. Preston, ‘Too busy to farm: under-utilisation of farm land in central Java’, JDS 26, 1 (1989), pp. 43–57.
Paul Alexander, P. Boomgaard and B. White, ‘Introduction’, in Paul Alexander, P. Boomgaard and B. White (eds),In the shadow of agriculture: nonfarm activities in the Javanese economy, past and present ( Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute, 1991 ), p. 5.
Copyright information
© 1997 R. E. Elson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elson, R.E. (1997). Land and Landholding. In: The End of the Peasantry in Southeast Asia. A Modern Economic History of Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25457-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25457-6_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55294-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25457-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)