Skip to main content

Dissolving Adultery: Domesticity and Obscenity in The Game

  • Chapter
Scarlet Letters
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

This final essay deals with a novel that is relatively little known, partly because it is a first novel published in 1994.1 It was chosen because it explicitly or implicitly questions the significance of adultery in relation to a variety of kinds of contemporary context. In this opening section I attempt some additional contextualisation which should show why this is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Frances Liardet, The Game (London, Macmillan, 1994). For their helpful and encouraging remarks on preliminary drafts of this essay, thanks to David Bellos, Ann Caesar, Peter Hainsworth, Nicholas White, and, especially, Frances Liardet and Naomi Segal. For any defects in the final version, I am of course to blame.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On public opinion at the turn of the decade, see Jacques Derrida, ‘La démocratie ajournée’, in L’autre cap (Paris: Minuit, 1991). I do not, of course, wish to suggest that this material is easily compatible with that cited in note 2 above. The disjunction between Jameson’s work and Derrida’s would need to be charted by reference to their different responses to Sartre, Althusser and Lyotard.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Perry Anderson, ‘A culture in contraflow’, in English Questions (London: Verso, 1993), 193–301, for a classic statement of the view that there is some meaningful sense in which British academia swung to the Left while society in general swung to the Right in the 1970s and 1980s. It didn’t feel like that if you had your undergraduate and postgraduate education, as well as your apprenticeship in university teaching, all since 1979. Nor is it easy to make sense of Anderson’s position in abstract principle, since a meaningfully politicised academy would presumably by definition exert some influence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, J. (1997). Dissolving Adultery: Domesticity and Obscenity in The Game. In: Scarlet Letters. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25446-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics