Patriarchal Ideology and French Fictions of Adultery 1830–57



In the early decades of the nineteenth century the institution of marriage underwent a significant transformation: the profoundly misogynistic Civil Code, drawn up by Napoleon’s lawyers, established a new legal framework for marriage in an attempt to strengthen the authority of the husband, proved profoundly inimical to new expectations relating to marriage, and ran directly counter to the principles of liberty and equality which were part of the broad cultural legacy of the French Revolution. From 1830 marriage became the focus of considerable debate and gave rise to attempts to codify its underlying logic and a wide range of literary representations. The state of marriage was a question which was urgently addressed in many quarters, a sensitive subject of virtually universal concern. Literature clearly had a vital and, in some respects ambivalent, role in this collective preoccupation with marriage: the novel, in particular, both diagnosed and contributed to the difficulties of marriage. What is of particular interest, however, is the extent to which the novel reflected or was able, in some way, to maintain a critical distance from the conventional view of marriage. This question can be posed most acutely in relation to attitudes to adultery of the wife, which remained a central concern for much of the first half of the century, providing something of a test-case for theories about the relationship between ideology and literature.


Literary Work Literary Text Ideological Centrality Marital Relation Patriarchal System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. Eagleton, Ideology. An Introduction (London, Verso, 1991), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    See K. Marx and F. Engels, The German Ideology, quoted in R. Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford, OUP, 1977), p. 59.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    P. Macherey, Pour une Théorie de la production littéraire (Paris, Maspéro, 1970).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See T. Eagleton, Criticism and Ideology. A Study in Marxist Literary Theory (London, NLB, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 8.
    A.J. Greimas, Du Sens (Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1970), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    F. Jameson, The Political Unconscious. Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (London, Methuen, 1981), pp. 47–8.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    See the views quoted in C. Nesci, La Femme Mode d’emploi. Balzac, de la ‘Physiologie du mariage’ à ‘La Comédie humaine’ (Lexington, French Forum Publications, 1992), p. 21.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    See S. Heath, Gustave Flaubert. Madame Bovary (Cambridge, CUP, 1992), p. 78.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    J. Weeks, Sex, Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800 (London, Longman, 1981), p. 32.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    P.J. Proudhon, De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l’Eglise (1858), Oeuvres complètes, iv, Marcel Rivière,1935, p. 307 (quoted in Heath, op. cit., p. 81).Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    L. Rabine, ‘George Sand and the Myth of Femininity’, Women and Literature, 4 (1976), pp. 2–17.Google Scholar
  12. 22.
    This pattern has been discussed by N. Segal in The Adulteress’s Child: Authorship and Desire in the Nineteenth-Century Novel (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992), pp. 62–114.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    For a recent discussion of this preoccupation see C.A. Mossman, Politics and Narratives of Birth. Gynocolonization from Rousseau to Zola (Cambridge, CUP, 1993), pp. 19–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 26.
    See A. Michel, Le Manage chez Honoré de Balzac. Amour el féminisme (Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1978).Google Scholar
  15. 32.
    See C. Prendergast, Balzac: Fiction and Melodrama (London, Edward Arnold, 1977), p. 134.Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    See D. LaCapra, Madame Bovary on Trial (Cornell, Cornell University Press, 1982), p. 56.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    See for example ‘Masters’ by Rollie Hollstein, quoted by G. Falconer, ‘Création et conservation du sens dans Madame Bovary’ in La Production du sens chez Flaubert (Paris, Union générale d’éditions, 1975), pp. 395–6.Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    See in particular T. Tanner, Adultery in the Novel (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations