Skip to main content

Defining the National Interest: Russian Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics

  • Chapter
The Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation

Abstract

This chapter has two central objectives: first, it examines the domestic Russian debates on foreign policy, and in particular on conceptions of the national interest, in order to identify any general trends and emerging consensus on these issues among Russia’s political elites. Second, it assesses the workings of, and the relationship between, parliament and president as they have evolved since the collapse of the USSR in 1991. Lack of space prevents a detailed examination of other important institutions such as the military, or the numerous lobby groups that have formed in recent years.1 A focus on parliament and the presidency is justified, for they are the two critical representative institutions in any democracy, and an understanding of their roles and functions in determining the national interest and formulating foreign policy is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the military’s role see, for example, Andreas Heinemann-Grueder, ‘The Russian Military and the Crisis of the State’, Aussenpolitik, vol. 45, no. 1 (1994), pp. 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William Bloom, Personal Identify, National Identity and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Philip G. Cerny, ‘Foreign Policy Leadership and National Integration’, British Journal of International Studies, vol. 5 (1979), p. 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alex Pravda, ‘The Politics of Foreign Policy’, in Developments in Russian and Post-Soviet Politics, ed. Stephen White, Alex Pravda and Zvi Gitelman (London: Macmillan, 1994), pp. 208–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexei Arbatov, ‘Russia’s Foreign Policy Alternatives’, International Security, vol. 18, no. 2 (1993), pp. 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Shearman, ‘Russia’s Three Circles of Interests’, in Reshaping Regional Relations: Asia-Pacific and the Former Soviet Union, ed. Ramesh Thakur and Carlyle A. Thayer (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vladimir Lukin, Tsentry sily: kontseptsii i real’nosti (Moscow, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Andrei Kozyrev, ‘Partiia voiny nastupaet i v Moldove, i v Gruzii, i v Rossii’, Izvestiia (6 June 1992). He was warning here against aggressive policies designed ostensibly to support Russians resident in the near abroad but that could lead to dangerous forms of ultranationalism.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in Walter Laqueur, Black Hundred: The Rise of the Extreme Right in Russia (New York: HarperCollins, 1993), p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neil Malcolm, ‘The New Russian Foreign Policy’, The World Today, vol. 50 (February 1994), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also his chapter in Peter Shearman (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy since 1990 (Boulder: Westview, 1995, pp. 23–52).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, Graham T. Allison’s classic work Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston: Little Brown, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Allison’s bureaucratic politics model of decision-making was used in an assessment of Soviet foreign policy. See Jiri Valenta, Soviet Intervention in Czechoslovakia, 1968: Anatomy of a Decision (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979 and 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Peter Shearman, ‘New Political Thinking Reassessed’, Review of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 2 (1993), pp. 139–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. See Wendy Slater, ‘Russia’s Plebiscite on a New Constitution’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 3, no. 3 (1994), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Peter Lentini, ‘Electoral Associations in the 1993 Elections to the Russian State Duma’, unpublished manuscript (Melbourne, Monash University, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wendy Slater, ‘Russian Duma Sidelines Extremist Politicians’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 3, no. 7 (1994), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Roger E. Kanet and Alexander V. Kozhemiakin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shearman, P. (1997). Defining the National Interest: Russian Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics. In: Kanet, R.E., Kozhemiakin, A.V. (eds) The Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25440-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics