The Threat and Promise of Globalization: Can it be Made to Work for a Brighter Future?



Powerful dialectical forces are at work as the world economy undergoes a structural transformation, one that promises hope and opportunity and the other that threatens a future of despair and breakdown. The lifting of the enormous psychological, social and financial burdens of the Cold War and the tantalizing promise of scientific/technological innovations, symbolized by the computer chip and fibre optics, encourage hope and opportunity; the despair and the traumatic fear of slow or cataclysmic breakdown stems from the symptoms of global crisis, or rather of three overlapping and mutually-reinforcing crises of trade and capital flows — the debt crisis; of equity — the poverty crisis; and of ecology — the environment/energy crisis.’


Gross Domestic Product International Monetary Fund Real Interest Rate Capital Flow Capital Inflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    For a fuller discussion of the environment/energy crisis, see M. Miller, Debt & the Environment: Converging Crises, UN Publications: N.Y., 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Dowling, Business Week, March 15, 1993 in his review of Paul Kennedy’s book, Preparing for the Twenty-first Century, Random House: N.Y., 1993 paraphrases the prognosis set forth in the book if we remain on the present trajectory.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The picture is spelt out statistically in various publications of which the most complete and authoritative are the annual editions of the UN’s Human Development Report and the World Bank’s Social Indicators of Development and Trends in Developing Countries. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For a fuller treatment of this relationship, see A. MacEwan, ‘Globalization and Stagnation’, Monthly Review, N.Y., April 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries-1994, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp.88–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Bosworth, ‘Unemployed in Europe versus Poor in America’, International Economic Insights, Washington, D.C., March/April 1994, p.3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ‘Anti-Depression Economics’, The Atlantic Monthly, April 1993, p.103.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Barnet and J. Cavanagh, Global Dreams: Imperial Corporations and the New World Order, Random House: N.Y., 1994, p.425.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ‘Today’s Task for Economists’, Challenge, March/April 1993, p.10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Tyler, ‘The Nation-State vs. the Global Economy’, Challenge, March-April 1993, pp.30 & 32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    For a fuller discussion of the proposal for the CGIE2R project see, M. Miller, The Energy/Environment Connection: Overcoming Institutional Obstacles toDoing the Right Thing’, World Bank/EDI Energy Series Working Paper, Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Debt Tables, 1992–93, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1993, especially p.15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The trends in the key indicators of ‘the human condition’ is graphically documented in the annual editions of the UN’s Human Development Report, the World Bank’s annual Atlas, and the World Bank’s Social Indicators of Development, The John Hopkins University Press Baltimore, Md. (Annual).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ‘A Survey of Multinationals’, The Economist, 27 March 1993, pp5–6; and ‘Come back multinationals .. .[that] seemed fated to succeed colonial powers as the bogeyman . . . ’, 26 November 1988.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Global Corporation and Nation-states: Do Companies or Countries Compete, National Planning Association, Washington, D.C., 1993, p5; see also Barnet and Cavanagh 1994, op.cit., passim. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cited by Barnet and Cavanagh 1994, op.cit., p.328.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    See Bank for International Settlements, Recent Innovations in International Banking, Basle, Switzerland, 1986, p.149 and passim; R.C. Smith, The Global Bankers, E.P. Dutton, N.Y., 1989, especially the chapter entitled ‘The Globalization of Capital Markets.’Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Economist, May 14–20, 1994, p.15.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ibid., pp.14–15.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    See P. Krugman, ‘International Adjustments 1985–90: What Have We Learned?’, International Economic Insights, November/December 1990, p.21.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    See B.B. Aghevil and J.M. Boughton, ‘National Saving and the World Economy: Why have savings rates declined since the early 1970s?’, Finance & Development, June 1990, pp.2–5; A.L. Bovenberg, ‘Why has U.S. Personal Saving Declined?’, Finance & Development, June 1990, pp.10–11; and J.J. Polak, ‘The Decline of World Savings’, Economic Insights, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., September/October 1990, pp.18- 19.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Collins, ‘Capital Flows to Developing Countries: Implications from the Economies in Transition’, Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Development Economies 1992, World Bank: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    For a breakdown of the estimates see M. Miller, The Energy/Environment Connection: Overcoming the Institutional Obstacles to Doing the Right Thing, ’ World Bank/EDI Working Paper, Washington, D.C., 1990, and ‘Getting Grounded at Rio’, Ecodecision, April 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Pfefferman and A. Madrassy, Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries 1993: Statistics for 1970–91. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quoted in J. Evans, ‘What If They Declared a Debt Crisis and Nobody Came?’, International Development Review, Winter, 1989/90, p.46.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    See, for example, P. Shabecoff, ‘A “Marshall Plan” for the Environment’, The New York Times, May 3, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Dobell and T. Parson, ‘A World Development Fund’, Policy Options Politiques, December 1988; Our Common Future, report of the Brundtland Commission, Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    For a long list of such voices, see M. Miller, ‘Coping is not Enough! The International Debt Crisis and the Roles of the World Bank and the IMF’, Dow Jones-Irwin Inc., Homewood, Illinois, 1988, pp.151–5.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. Bergsten, ‘A New Big Three to Manage the World Economy’, Challenge, Nov-Dec, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., p24; R.Reich, ‘Commentary on: Globalization and the Nation-state’, Review90, Outlook91, North-South Institute, Ottawa, 1991, p.21.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Wall Street Journal, May 9, 1994Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Cooper, ‘A Monetary System for the Future’, Foreign Affairs, Fall 1984.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    G. Helleiner, ‘An Agenda for a New Bretton Woods’, Foreign Policy Journal, Winter 1987–8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Bernstein, ‘Do we need a new Bretton Woods?’, Finance and Development, September 1984; for a critique of Bernstein’s postion see, M. Miller 1988, op.cit.. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    See C.P. Kindleberger, presidential address to the American Economic Association annual meeting on December 29, 1985 reprinted in ‘International Public Goods without international Government’, The American Economic Review, March 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs 1997

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations