Skip to main content
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

Soames and his staff now faced two related problems. The first was the continuing high level of incidents attributable to outstanding ZANLA groups. The second was the attitude of the Rhodesian commanders. They had scarcely anticipated ending the assembly process with the Front still in the settlement — expecting ZANLA in particular either to make no effort to assemble the majority of their forces, or undisciplined units to start fighting the monitoring force. They protested that ZANLA had used the period of disengagement to move large numbers of men across the Mozambique border, in violation of the cease-fire agreement. Soames had already authorized a Rhodesian deployment along the eastern border. Appeals were also made to the government of Mozambique. But they were no more able than the Rhodesians to control much of the border; and they wanted as many ZANLA as possible inside Rhodesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Sir Robin Renwick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renwick, R. (1997). Tension. In: Unconventional Diplomacy in Southern Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25399-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics