Skip to main content

The Emergent European Union: Democratic Legitimacy and the 1996 Inter-governmental Conference

  • Chapter
Book cover The Future of Europe

Abstract

The obsession in the European Union (EU) with the issue of whether or not it conforms to some ideal type of a liberal-democratic, representative polity believed to typify contemporary West European regimes is honorable and symptomatic of the extent to which the concept of the EU and working within it has become entrenched in the minds of government and non-government actors as well as the public in the Member States. That efforts should be undertaken to make the emergent EU polity conform to liberal, democratic practice based on open, transparent, accountable and representative (if not altogether efficient) government is laudable. It is also a response to two forces: prospective enlargement to states with totalitarian traditions; and the growth of cynicism and disaffection from political processes among the populace of the EU’s Member States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Closa (1992), ‘The Concept of Citizenship in the Treaty on European Union’, Common Market Law Review, No. 29, pp. 1147–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Européene (1995), Rapport sur le functionnement du traité sur l’ Union Européenne, 10 May, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil et Etats membre réunis au sein du Conseil (1991), ‘Résolution sur les Droits de l’Homme, la Démocraties et le Développement’, Bulletin of the European Communities, 28 November, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil européen de Copenhague (1978), ‘Déclaration sur le Democratie’, Bulletin of the European Communities, 8 April, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil européen de Dublin (1990), ‘Déclaration sur l’Antisémitisme, le Racisme et la Xénophobie’, Bulletin of the European Communities, 25–26 June, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil européen de Luxembourg (1991a), ‘Déclaration sue les Droits de l’Homme’, Bulletin of the European Communities, 28–29 June, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil européen de Maastricht (1991b), ‘Déclaration sur le Racisme et la Xenophobie’, Bulletin of the European Communities, 9–10 December, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1993), The Treaty of Maastricht, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Secretariat (1994), Berlin Declaration of Increased co-operation in Combating Drug Crime and Organised Crime in Europe, Berlin 8 September, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1995), European Parliament Working Document, B4–348/95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1992), Internal Security and Judicial co-operation Beyond Maastricht, ECRU, Hull University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1994), ‘Transparency and Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, September pp. 343–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1995), Institutional Affairs, Discussion Paper No. 3 by the Jean Monnet Group of Experts in the series, The European Union and the 1996 IGC — Crisis or Opportunity?, May, Centre for European Union Studies and the Representation of the European Commission in the UK, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1995a forthcoming), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and the EC: Crossing the Rubicon’, International Journal of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D. (1995), Constitutional Issues: The European Parliament and National Parliaments, Discussion Paper No. 2 by the Jean Monnet Group of Experts in the series, The European Union and the 1996 IGC: Crisis or Opportunity?, May, Centre for European Union Studies and the Representation of the European Commission in the UK, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlement Européen (1989), ‘Déclaration sur les Droits et Libertés Fondamentaux’, 12 April. Journal Officiel, C120, 16 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlement Européen (1994), Le Parlement Européen et Les Droits de l’ Homme, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament Européen, Conseil et Commission (1977), ‘Déclaration Commune sur les Droits Fondamentaux’, Journal Officiel, C103, 27 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermers, H.G. (1990), ‘The European Communities Bound by Fundamental Human Rights’, Common Market Law Review, No. 27, pp. 249–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lodge, J. (1997). The Emergent European Union: Democratic Legitimacy and the 1996 Inter-governmental Conference. In: Symes, V., Levy, C., Littlewood, J. (eds) The Future of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25379-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics