Skip to main content

Suppose Everybody Behaved Like That?

  • Chapter
  • 77 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

My mother, like most mothers, was fond of the question: Suppose everybody behaved liked that? Her logic was the same as Spinoza’s (1674) in the quotation from his Tractatus Politicus that heads this chapter. Since things would be bad for everybody if everybody behaved selfishly, selfishness must therefore be irrational. Rousseau (1762) argues similarly in his Inequality of Man when telling the famous stag-hunt tale.2 However, Kant (1785) is the most famous pedlar of the fallacy. As his categorical imperative puts it: Act only on the maxim that you would at the same time will to be a universal law.

What if a man could save himself from the present danger of death by treachery? If reason should recommend that, it would recommend it to all men.

(Benedict de Spinoza)

This paper is condensed from chapters 2 and 3 of a planned book, Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abreu, D. and H. Rubinstein (1988) ‘The Structure of Nash Equilibrium in Repeated Games with Finite Automata’, Econometrica, vol. 56, pp. 1259–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. (1987) ‘Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality’, Econometrica, vol. 55, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1987) ‘The Evolution of Strategies in the Iterated Prisoners’ Dilemma’, in L. Davis (ed.), Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing (Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1989) ‘Love and Spaghetti, the Opportunity Cost of Virtue’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, pp. 165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K.G. and L. Samuelson (1990) ‘Evolutionary Stability in Repeated Games Played by Finite Automata’, forthcoming in Journal of Economic Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. (1983) Superior Beings (New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, J. and J. Hirshleifer (1991) ‘The Limits of Reciprocity’, Rationality and Society, vol. 3, pp. 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1988) Passions within Reason (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and E. Maskin (1990) ‘Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games’, American Economic Review, vol. 80, pp. 274–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D. (1986) Morals by Agreement Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. (1983) ‘Metamagical Themes’, Scientific American, vol. 248, no. 6, pp. 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. (1988) ‘Cooperation in the Prisoners’ Dilemma’, Theory and Decision, vol. 24, pp. 203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Nigel (1971) Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785) Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, translated and analyzed by H. Paton (1964) (New York: Harper Torchbooks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. (1982) ‘A Note on Newcombmania’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 79, pp. 337–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1979) ‘Prisoners’ Dilemma as a Newcomb Problem’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 8, pp. 235–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linster, B. (1990) ‘Essays on Cooperation and Competition’, PhD thesis, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nachbar, J. (1989) ‘The Evolution of Cooperation Revisted’, Working Paper, Rand Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1969) ‘Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (1988) Labyrinths of Reason (New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, D. (1992) ‘Evolution in the Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma’, Working Paper (in preparation), University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1966) Two-Person Game Theory (Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1762) ‘The Social Contract’, in G. Cole (ed.) (1913), Rousseau’s Social Contract and Discourses, pp. 5–123 (London: J.M. Dent).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. (1951) The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973) ‘Behaviour and the Concept of Preference’, Economica, vol. 40, pp. 241–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. De (first published 1674) Tractatus politicus, translated by R. Elwes (1909) in Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, Volume I (London: Bell).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 International Economics Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binmore, K. (1996). Suppose Everybody Behaved Like That?. In: Allen, B. (eds) Economics in a Changing World. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25168-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics