Skip to main content

The Transatlantic Partnership in the 1990s

  • Chapter
The Transatlantic Relationship
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

The transatlantic partnership in the 1990s consists of a complex web of institutions wherein the Unites States and Europe cooperate in the spheres of politics, security, economics, and culture. These institutions have shown a greater dynamism in the 1990s than perhaps at any time since their creation. Responding to changed security realities, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was enlarged to encompass the states of Central and Eastern Europe through the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC) in December 1991 and the Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme in January 1994. The main transatlantic partners are also the main players in the economic organizations of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank group (IBRD), and were the dominant forces behind the transformation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in January 1994. These actors also consult through the Group of Seven (G7) industrialized states and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). To these was added the Declaration on US-EC Relations of 23 November 1990, which established a framework for regular and intensive consultation. Recently, there have been calls for a further institutionalization of an ‘Atlantic Community,’ and proposals for a comprehensive agreement on foreign direct investment and a transatlantic free trade area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Clair Wilcox, A Charter for World Trade Macmillan, New York, 1949;

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Richard N. Gardner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: The Origins and the Prospects of our International Economic Order Columbia University Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Joseph Lepgold, The Declining Hegemon: The United States and European Defense, 1960–1990 Praeger, London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For instance, Services of the European Commission, Report on US Barriers to Trade and Investment Doc. No.I/194/94 (April 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Dan Hiester, ‘NATO: Approaching the Millennium,’ in PM Dunay, Gabor Kardos and Andrew J. Williams (eds.), New Forms of Security: Views from Central, Eastern and Western Europe Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1995;

    Google Scholar 

  6. and Hiester , ‘The United States as a Power in Europe,’ in Robert Jordan (ed.), Europe and the Superpowers: Essays on European International Politics Pinter, London, 1991, pp.22–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gebhardt von Moltke, ‘Building a Partnership for Peace,’ NATO Review No.3, June 1994, p.3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See NATO, Partnership for Peace Framework Document of the NATO Summit in Brussels, 10 January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dan Hiester, ‘Introduction: The Future of the Transatlantic Relationship,’ Paradigms: The Kent Journal of International Relations Vol.7, No.2, 1993, pp.vi–xi;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarrod Wiener, ‘Leadership, the United Nations, and the New World Order,’ in Jarrod Wiener and Dimitris Bourantonis (eds.), The United Nations in the New World Order Macmillan, London, 1995, pp.41–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mervyn Frost, ‘Constituting a New World Order,’ Paradigms: The Kent Journal of International Relations Vol.8, No.1, 1994, pp.13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See also Chris Brown (ed.), Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Aspects Routledge, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. François de Rose, ‘A Future Perspective for the Alliance,’ NATO Review No.4, July 1995, p.12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury (eds.), United Nations, Divided World: The UN’s Role in International Relations 2nd. ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reputedly Frederick the Great. See Adam Watson, Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States Routledge, London, 1991, p.53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Jarrod Wiener, ‘Endgame for the GATT, or the End of the GATT? The Uruguay Round and the US-EC Relationship,’ Paradigms: The Kent Journal of International Relations Vol.7, No.2, 1993, pp.94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. See Richard Harmsen and Arvind Subramanian, ‘Economic Implications of the Uruguay Round,’ International Trade Policies: The Uruguay Round and Beyond, Vol.1, Principal Issues IMF, Washington, 1994, pp.4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This point is made by Kym Anderson and Richard Blackhurst (eds.), ‘Introduction,’ Regional Integration and the Global Trading System Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cynthia Day Wallace and John M. Kline, EC ’92 and Changing Global Investment Patterns: Implications for the US-EC Relationship The Centre for Strategic International Studies, Washington DC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example, H.W. Arndt, The Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ted Galen Carpenter, quoted in ‘Ancien Regime Fights for the Old Order and America Firsters Look to their Own,’ The Guardian 20 February 1995. p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barry Buzan and Gerald Segal, ‘Rethinking East Asian Security,’ Survival Vol.36, No.2, Summer 1994, p.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rep. Duncan L. Hunter, quoted in ‘Trade, Defense Issues Fray US-Japan Ties,’ Congressional Quarterly 27 November 1982, pp.2903–2908.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willy Claes, ‘NATO and the Evolving Euro-Atlantic Security Architecture,’ NATO Review Vol.42, No.6, December 1994/No.1 January 1995, pp.3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nicholas Sherwen, ‘Introduction,’ in Jamie Shea, NATO 2000: A Political Agenda for a Political Alliance Brassey’s, London, 1990, p.2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. International Institute for Strategic Studies, Strategic Survey 1994–1995 May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiener, J., Hiester, D. (1996). The Transatlantic Partnership in the 1990s. In: Wiener, J. (eds) The Transatlantic Relationship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25157-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics