Skip to main content

South Korean Foreign Policy

  • Chapter
  • 90 Accesses

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

The division of Korea came about as a result of the power vacuum left when the Japanese colonial government was defeated. The country was divided into two zones to handle the surrender of the Japanese forces but the division became permanent and the two entities which resulted fought a bloody war, in which one side was supported by the Soviet Union and China and the other by a United Nations force in which the United States played the dominant role. The armistice was never converted into a peace treaty; the communist regime in the North and the successive regimes in the South, dominated until recently by the military, have maintained mutual hostility. In her earliest days South Korea was weak economically, suffered from a low degree of international acceptance and was excluded from the United Nations. Her foreign policy was staunchly anti-communist and much effort was put into competitive diplomacy with North Korea in order to win international recognition.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sang-seek Park, ‘Determinants of Korean Foreign Policy’ in Korea and World Affairs (Fall 1986) pp. 457–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Handbook of Korea (Seoul: Seoul International Publishing House, Sixth Edition, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a full discussion of this problem see, for example, Barry Gills, ‘Prospects for Peace and Stability in Northeast Asia: the Korean Conflict’ in Conflict, 278 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sang Hoon Park, ‘North Korea and the Challenge to the US-South Korean Alliance’ in Survival, 36 (1994) pp. 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kwang Soo Choi, ‘Korea’s Foreign Policy in the 1990s’ in Korea and World Affairs, 13 (1989) pp. 253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barry Buzan and Gerald Segal, ‘Rethinking East Asian Security’ in Survival 36 (1994) pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Desmond Ball, ‘Arms and Affluence; Military Acquisitions in the Asia Pacific Region’ in International Security, 18 (1993) pp. 78–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aaron L. Friedberg, ‘Ripe for Rivalry; Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia’ in International Security, 18 (1993) pp. 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Clarke, ‘APEC as a Semi-Solution’ in Orbis 39 (1995) pp. 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kishore Mahbubani, ‘The Pacific Impulse’ in Survival, 37 (1995) pp. 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon Young Park, ‘“Lure” North Korea’ in Foreign Policy, 97 (1994–5) pp. 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Bracken, ‘Risks and Promises in the Two Koreas’ in Orbis, 39 (1995) pp. 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Middleton, L. (1997). South Korean Foreign Policy. In: Kim, D.H., Kong, T.Y. (eds) The Korean Peninsula in Transition. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25141-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics